HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted May 2, 2014, 7:11 PM
corvairkeith's Avatar
corvairkeith corvairkeith is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,483
It's at grade now and should be above grade in the next couple weeks.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted May 3, 2014, 12:19 AM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,395
I was wondering when this project will start rising. Glad there making progress.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 2:05 PM
priller's Avatar
priller priller is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,979
Above ground now:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 3:51 PM
migol24 migol24 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by priller View Post
This angle here indicates what Austin's density could have looked like had Austin not destroyed many of those beautiful older buildings that once existed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 4:06 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
Austin really never had that density anyway, so I'm not sure what you're talking about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 7:00 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Austin really never had that density anyway, so I'm not sure what you're talking about.
I think he is talking about a pre-parking lot downtown when most every parcel was filled with some kind of structure. In this part of town it was mostly one and two story buildings including a lot of houses. This meant a certain density or at least a visual density that disappeared with parking lots. Most of these buildings were pulled down in the 1950s and 1960s and the parcels paved over into parking lots. It was the same story in just about every city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 7:24 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,980
I went by there yesterday. It's strange for something to finally be there. All of these places that have been useless blight for my entire Life are being turned into places of significance. You really can't underestimate the power of one or two buildings to completely change the complexion of an area. It can change your whole perspective of everything around it.

I can't wait until 5th & Brazos is underway, too. I suspect it won't be long now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 7:40 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,861
wwmiv is right, Austin was never big enough 60 to 100+ years ago to really have the midrise density that I think some people mean when referring to what was torn down. 1 to 2 floors is not density imo. As it is thats the issue with DT right now is we have these lovely old historical buildings which are great but are only 2 or 3 stories at most, then we have nice new shiny highrises alongside them with little in the way if 8 to 12 floor midrises, at least not south of 6th as much. We just were never big enough to develop those types if buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2014, 8:23 PM
MightyYoda MightyYoda is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
wwmiv is right, Austin was never big enough 60 to 100+ years ago to really have the midrise density that I think some people mean when referring to what was torn down. 1 to 2 floors is not density imo. As it is thats the issue with DT right now is we have these lovely old historical buildings which are great but are only 2 or 3 stories at most, then we have nice new shiny highrises alongside them with little in the way if 8 to 12 floor midrises, at least not south of 6th as much. We just were never big enough to develop those types if buildings.
That's what I mean why I say the skyline is a bit top heavy towards the river and we need more infill. There are a lot of mid-rises, but most all of them are concentrated near the capital area. We need more IBC type projects in the 100-200 ft range, but on small parcels, not what Millenium Rainey is doing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2014, 4:31 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
wwmiv is right, Austin was never big enough 60 to 100+ years ago to really have the midrise density that I think some people mean when referring to what was torn down. 1 to 2 floors is not density imo. As it is thats the issue with DT right now is we have these lovely old historical buildings which are great but are only 2 or 3 stories at most, then we have nice new shiny highrises alongside them with little in the way if 8 to 12 floor midrises, at least not south of 6th as much. We just were never big enough to develop those types if buildings.
Thanks for the support.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 9:50 PM
corvairkeith's Avatar
corvairkeith corvairkeith is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,483
Starting to rise pretty quickly now that it's above ground.





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2014, 10:45 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12,836
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2014, 12:58 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 55,833
Rooftop pool...nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 9:42 PM
priller's Avatar
priller priller is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,979
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 5:07 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Thanks for the support.





By the way, is it just me or does it seem like it's taking a long time for this building to rise? I know they dug down pretty deep, it's been above ground for a bit now.

Or maybe not...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 6:49 PM
MightyYoda MightyYoda is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 445
This one has gone at a normal speed IMO. Now ZaZa, that thing is crawling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 7:36 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyYoda View Post
This one has gone at a normal speed IMO. Now ZaZa, that thing is crawling.
I really don't think zaza is going to happen. Could be wrong though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 7:47 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
I don't either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 10:16 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,443
You are referring to Hotel NaDa, correct?

Sorry...had to do it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 10:47 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
You are referring to Hotel NaDa, correct?

Sorry...had to do it
lol. I like...sounds better than the actual name. I always thought "zaza" sounded so tacky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:36 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.