Quote:
Originally Posted by cafeguy
The only one I can think of is the water works unfortunately. There is a cafe on the bridge just east of the trail on walnut street, but nothing else. The attempt to include a cafe at the new dranoff building was shot down. Unfortunately, I think most people who live close to the trail want commercial to completely stay out of it. Although, it really would be so nice if at least a portion of it were lined with cafes or restaurants. As it stands right now, however, its pretty dense with people throughout the day. With the train tracks there, it might be difficult to pack things like that into the sliver of land. More realistically, we might see restaurants to the east of the trains that could serve as easy walks to the trail.
|
I think the last sentence is spot on, because of the logistics of developing west of the railroad tracks, and the flood zone. As for cafes
on the trail, I think we're going to see more food trucks and pop up cafes/beer gardens.
From what I've read about the SRDC, they aren't as adverse to development along the river as many think. They know it's an urban river and why that's an asset. If I recall, most of the stink about Dranoff's garage and CHoP came from neighbors and Inga Saffrron, the SRDC was pretty quiet on the subject. In my opinion, the DRWC could really learn a thing or two from them.