HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 4:09 PM
Stonemans_rowJ's Avatar
Stonemans_rowJ Stonemans_rowJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hilltop
Posts: 391
Seems to me people paying luxury prices would not want to walk through a parking structure (could be your spot is on the far side of this structure) to then get into the building, and take the elevator. Not very luxurious.
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 5:22 PM
denconyny denconyny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill View Post
I was just using the word photoshop as a verb - like one would use the “verb” google.

Anyway, I like weed as much as the next guy, but I don’t like what has happened to denver’s reputation since the new law passed. That’s why the whole idea of some sort of pot industry headquarters/building makes me cringe.

I can’t wait until all of this pot brouhaha passes. It’s ridiculous. It seems like every freaking time I see or hear Denver or Colorado mentioned in the media, there has to be some sort of pot pun involved. And every time I tell somebody I’m from Denver, I get stuck in the same obligatory conversation about legalization. It’s getting to the point where I don’t like to tell people I’m from there because I don’t want to keep having the same conversation about marijuana legalization over and over again.

It used to be, when people thought of Denver, they thought of skiing. Now they think of pot. That’s not good.

Anyway, that’s why your “photoshoped” bong-building thingy made me cry.
Okay, got the part about photoshoped.......

Now..... the last thing that I wanted to do here is make anyone cringe. That being said, I stayed a lurker here at first for a few years...... and the only thing that got me started was the negativity and outright ignorance of some posts relating to marijuana.

Just for everyone's FYI, I do like to smoke pot..... but I do it every few days, if that much. As there are many times in life even with the best of us (and believe me, I'm not claiming to be anywhere near the best here) but sh*t sometimes happen, and smoking some joint can usually change my mood for a while, almost always for the better. And sometimes I just want a taste of some good smoke in my mouth, the way anyone would like the taste of a fine wine.... which I also like..... sometimes.

That being said, I'm surprised that what's really missing here is really not even about marijuana (although that's the issue) but rather the appreciation that the majority of voters of Colorado (as well as Washington State) have said "ENOUGH!" and put a stop to this stupid nonsense and complete injustice about anyone who likes to smoke (or forms of eating or drinking) marijuana, which basically is a harmless natural product which in itself usually makes people happy for a while. And nothing wrong with that. It's the stupid, asinine laws that have ruined so many people's lives here.

If I may also add here..... stand up and be BRAGGING that you're from Colorado, where REASON has finally prevailed! The people here, along with the people of the State of Washington, have taken on the world's most powerful government (be it that it is our own) and said ENOUGH with the embedded stupidity and injustice about marijuana. Adults can make their own choices in this regard. This isn't quite the Renaissance, where enlightenment and knowledge became virtuous, or the American Revolution and Boston, where individual freedom became a principle idea. But this is Colorado...... and something monumental and historic has happened here. And as with all new journeys that "wise men" have claimed doom if certain paths were traveled...... geesh..... the sky hasn't fallen down on the State of Colorado.... amazing, eh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
What do we do about the image? None of us want Denver to get the reputation that Amsterdam developed over the last 50 or so years.

.........................

2nd) Pump money into CU, CSU, and, DU to study what marijuana really does, what positive products can be spun off, etc.

The issue is not just the "reputation," but how can the product be utilized for treatment in psychotherapy, pain reduction from trauma, and, cancer therapy for starters.

3rd) Colorado, Washington state, and whatever state votes to legalize pot need to work out social behavior standards-not just laws- relating to the legal use of pot. For example, I do not like smelling pot as I am driving down the road with my windows down (some of the pot stores truly "stink.") nor do I appreciate wafts of smell while I am walking on the sidewalk to a business appointment, anymore than I like the smell of fetid booze.

I worry about the affects of pot on children, and, how "good" and "responsible" social behavior is taught to them. US kids, as a rule, are not receiving a good education as it is, and, the deleterious impact of pot on a mind in it's learning phase still has not been adequately mapped. Does the "mellow" aspect of smoking pot reduce the angst required to learn subjects like physics, mathematics, writing, and, foreign languages which are increasingly important skills for the next generation to be able to compete in the Chinese Centric world? Young people need to understand just how clear their minds need to be to prepare for their future leadership roles. Once these young people have grown up and mastered basic 21st Century skills, then what they chose to smoke is their business.

What has to happen is for our culture to hammer out new, widely accepted behavior norms.

(Hopefully, TV, and, movies, institutions that bear much of the responsibility for social "crap," can assist.)
Yes, marijuana needs to be studied, which hopefully here it can be. And its applications, especially with MS and other chronic illnesses can finally be researched and documented. It's a shame that this knowledge isn't already with us, due to long time embedded stupidity. And yes, maybe many people don't like it.... then don't use it! But that's not a reason to ban it. And finally, yes, those under 18 years of age do need extra attention with this matter, and other matters as well. Now that there will be extra $$$$$ in the coffers of education (rather than being pumped into an unregulated market), then hopefully many more students will get the benefits of better education.

BTW, here's a good link about all the embedded stupidity of marijuana:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/20...inst-legalizing-marijuana_n_5175880.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobg View Post
The weed jokes will pass. The discussion will die down as these other states join in. Sales are starting in Washington next month, Alaska is voting on it in the fall, and Oregon could vote on it in the fall as well. Additionally, In 2016 MPP is targeting about a half dozen states to vote on it.

In some respects it's like gay marriage, in that there were tons of jokes about it initially, everyone said it would drive conservatives and investment away from that state, but without googling it I cannot tell you which state did it first but I am sure they are doing fine. These things die down as people realize how stupid we have been, and how the jokes just aren't funny in light of the actual ramifications.

Here in CO we are probably sick of it more than most because we've already had these discussions ad nauseam. But somehow someone seems to always bring it up, and we reluctantly debate it all over again with same old tired arguments (on both sides).
Yes, things are changing..... and we here in Colorado are FIRST with the courage to enact this change. And since this is a development thread, I have to say there needs to be a proper commemoration of this. And since we are first to market, develop this into a sustained economic enterprise for the State, and especially for the City of Denver for many generations forward. Declare a zone in Denver where ignorance was finally defeated, and make the most of it both in commemoration and economically.

And already economically, it is estimated that some 7,500-10,000 people in the state are employed because of the pot industry. And it is estimated that the stupidity about marijuana is costing the nation some $17 BILLION each year. And golly, I have to say that it's such a harmful element here that there has never been an actual recorded human death from marijuana usage in over 10,000 years, eh?

Back to Denver development.... I personally would like to see a lot of the same things that most people like about this site..... development. Tall buildings, unique architecture, street life, DT surface parking lots becoming extinct, etc. And unfortunately, for all the conversation that goes on here about development, this new and unique industry that we have here seems more scoffed at, and stupidized (my made-up word) rather than being embraced and making the most of it economically as well as the fact that finally people have courageously put an end to ignorance and injustice.

Nobody here (or anywhere) has to personally like it. No one is forced to use it! But hopefully, just because people don't personally like it, these days are ended where it seems that many would rather hang their head in shame about this than realizing the justice achieved and the potential of tremendous economic opportunity. And sometime soon, may the rest of the majority of good citizens in the rest of the U.S. states get their heads out of their a**es and find the reasonable perspective that has so long been lacking with marijuana.

Enough said here......

Last edited by denconyny; Jun 17, 2014 at 6:51 AM. Reason: grammar
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 6:18 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
I suspect Denver's time in the sun for pot is going to be short-lived. A few years from now it'll be legal everywhere, simply because it costs too much to enforce against. When the happens, the fact that Denver was first will just be an historical footnote.

... That said, even when it's legal everywhere there will still be "pot capitals," just like there are beer capitals today (Denver, Portland, Milwaukee, etc). Whether or not Denver will be one remains to be seen.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 1:11 AM
LAM's Avatar
LAM LAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonemans_rowJ View Post
Seems to me people paying luxury prices would not want to walk through a parking structure (could be your spot is on the far side of this structure) to then get into the building, and take the elevator. Not very luxurious.
Aside from valet parking (which I'm sure they could have), I'm not too sure where else they could park with out being in a parking lot/garage of some sort.

I did see an article once with a super skinny tower in NYC that had a car elevator that would allow a 1-car garage for each unit. But that is of course pretty expensive. If the building is big, it would be too hard to manage with out multiple lifts.
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 1:40 AM
seventwenty's Avatar
seventwenty seventwenty is offline
I took a bus pic, CIRRUS
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Soon to be banned
Posts: 1,697
Wrong thread.
__________________
The happy & obtuse bro.

"Of course you're right." Cirrus
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 3:15 AM
Stonemans_rowJ's Avatar
Stonemans_rowJ Stonemans_rowJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hilltop
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAM View Post
Aside from valet parking (which I'm sure they could have), I'm not too sure where else they could park with out being in a parking lot/garage of some sort.

I did see an article once with a super skinny tower in NYC that had a car elevator that would allow a 1-car garage for each unit. But that is of course pretty expensive. If the building is big, it would be too hard to manage with out multiple lifts.
I was referring to the distance a resident would have to walk in this separate structure vs. the distance to the elevator if the parking was in the base. Definitely less convenient.

Do the other buildings in the other cities have valet?

I don't think even the SugarCube has valet, does it?
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 4:14 AM
LAM's Avatar
LAM LAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonemans_rowJ View Post
I was referring to the distance a resident would have to walk in this separate structure vs. the distance to the elevator if the parking was in the base. Definitely less convenient.

Do the other buildings in the other cities have valet?

I don't think even the SugarCube has valet, does it?
Good question about Valet - I don't know. Of course, this is all relative. The building footprint is somewhat small and the distances were talking about are probably about half a block vs. about a qtr block if under the building. So, probably not a deal buster for most. Especially urbanites. I suspect that many of them really won't be driving often since they live downtown and presumably many of them will work downtown - I hope.
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 8:11 PM
COtoOC's Avatar
COtoOC COtoOC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO (Stapleton)
Posts: 1,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
Even Tasha Yar at the Star Trek TNG reunion at comic con this past weekend made a snide little "rocky mountain HIGH" joke.
On this subject, is that pistachio commercial with Stephen Colbert and the eagle a pot joke? I saw it last night and it looked like the eagle exhaled smoke and fell over while "Rocky Mountain High" was playing. I'm assuming that was the joke. I thought it was funny, if that's what they were going for.

But the pot jokes will die down eventually. Maybe WA can take the heat off for a while.
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 3:35 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by enjo13 View Post
No grocery stores anywhere close.... No parks anywhere nearby (Benedict Fountain is sort of close, but it's a chore to get to, same with Civic Center). You'd somehow have to break the hold on the lunch-only retail that dominates the area.

I think the best hope to populate the CBD is to populate Arapahoe Square first. To do that the city needs to actually invest the area. Starting with a public..uhm..square. Give something builders to galvanize around.
Why couldn't Arapahoe Square look like this? ....
picture compliments of VisitSaltLake.com

Surely whatever Salt Lake City can do Denver should be able to exceed.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.

Last edited by TakeFive; Jun 18, 2014 at 4:34 AM. Reason: pic credits
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 5:27 AM
enjo13 enjo13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Riverfront Park (Denver)
Posts: 1,833
Quote:
Surely whatever Salt Lake City can do Denver should be able to exceed.
We need a business as large as the Mormon church to fund something like that.
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 5:46 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,363
Housing for us common folk?

Given the exceptional success of the redevelopment of the former Village East ghetto and the La Alma/Lincoln Park project through local and federal (Hope VI) funding I'd like to see Denver be more proactive in the future as well. I wondered if DHA couldn't find/assemble sites between 13th and 16th Avenues for affordable housing.

I saw over the weekend where San Diego has done some master planning of their downtown neighborhoods with redevelopment and affordable housing (in some cases) in mind. It appears that they have come up with a complicated funding plan which I didn't take the time to understand but found it an interesting and desirable idea.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 6:04 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by enjo13 View Post
We need a business as large as the Mormon church to fund something like that.
Haha, good point.

Admittedly City Creek Center is more Cherry Creek-ish than downtown-ish but I like the idea of a retail focus activating the public space. In any event Denver just successfully achieved a public project with adjacent improvements paying the funding at Union Station so it should be doable.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 12:39 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
Haha, good point.

Admittedly City Creek Center is more Cherry Creek-ish than downtown-ish but I like the idea of a retail focus activating the public space. In any event Denver just successfully achieved a public project with adjacent improvements paying the funding at Union Station so it should be doable.
We do this all the time. Every mixed use retail project you see funded public spaces with adjacent development. Belmar, for example. We just don't have the demand to do anything that large (or the single property ownership). But the model is something we use every day.
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 2:56 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
Here are some interesting one's from 1963. This is just before Skyline took off. Look at all of those buildings!


Colorado by Roberto41144 on Flickr


Colorado by Roberto41144 on Flickr


Colorado by Roberto41144 on Flickr
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 3:26 PM
Brock Landers Brock Landers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanD View Post
Here are some interesting one's from 1963. This is just before Skyline took off. Look at all of those buildings!
Look at all that affordable housing
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 5:22 PM
DenvertoLA DenvertoLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 389
I think The Platform has topped off guys
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 5:33 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenvertoLA View Post
I think The Platform has topped off guys
Not quite! One more floor to go! Holland is expecting to top out in July.
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2014, 6:07 PM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 875
I thought it topped off too. I checked out the construction cam a few days ago and counted 21 floors.
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2014, 12:31 AM
Denver Denver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill View Post
I thought it topped off too. I checked out the construction cam a few days ago and counted 21 floors.
I think they have topped off. If you look at the level they are working on right now, you can see that it is slanted which is how the roof of the building is supposed to appear.
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2014, 12:33 AM
Denver Denver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 457
New rendering (at least for me) of EnV (1000 Speer). Looks really good IMO.


Source: Snavely Group Web Page http://www.snavely.com/images/featureddevlopment.png

Edit: This could be an older rendering because the design is slightly different from what the architect webpage shows http://pagethink.com/v/project-detail/EnV-Denver-1000-Speer/6m/
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.