HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 9:28 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,321
Great work MIT! Some shovels in the ground will tempt others to get a move on their own projects. Blanchard comes to mind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 9:46 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,515
Nice work MeIsThomas.
Have you ever thought about contributing to the city's SSP diagrams? There are getting to be a few gaps on that listing now.

I too think the additional height is welcome, especially with the Artizen planned not far to the south, and the potential for other lots north of King William to see infill over the longer term. I could see the city asking the developer to create more of a setback though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 10:15 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera View Post
With the 20-storey redevelopment at the former William Thompson site (The Artizen?) just a block or so south of this site, I'm thinking it will fit in just fine.

I like how it mimics the profile of Landmark Place at 100 Main East using modern glass, steel and limestone veneer cladding.
I'm with Mark on this one. I'm wondering if the whole project will come to pass though. I'm also wondering if maybe 22 stories is their opening offer and then look like they are compromising when they come back with plans for 15 stories.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 11:33 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,800
I'm wondering if they'll have a mix of setback options 1 and 2. So the 4th and 5th floors are set back, then 6 oneward stick out more than 4 and 5, but not all the way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 11:52 PM
thmx
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2014, 2:51 AM
thmx
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2014, 7:01 AM
woreg75 woreg75 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 110
I really think Hamilton should lose this height restriction.. For a city of this size it's ridiculous to maintain a status quo..
Secondly! Parking isn't everything when you live close to where you work or commute from..
Change needed with current council!
I've grown tired of these fossils coagulating change...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 8:23 PM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by woreg75 View Post
I really think Hamilton should lose this height restriction.. For a city of this size it's ridiculous to maintain a status quo..
Secondly! Parking isn't everything when you live close to where you work or commute from..
Change needed with current council!
I've grown tired of these fossils coagulating change...
The height restrictions have been in place since the 80's thanks to former councillor Geraldine Copps who had some kind of height phobia I think. So the current council is not to blame.

For the most part councils in the past have waved the restriction when asked to do so on a case by case basis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 8:31 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,800
Pretty well every city on earth has some height restrictions. Some are a matter of bedrock and soil stability. Others an issue of what infrastructure can support (not just roads, but the water lines too). I'm sure there's other fully valic reasons that I'm not able to think of too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2014, 1:43 AM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,785
I don't think there should be NO height restrictions but they should definitely be looked at on a neighborhood or BIA basis. High-rise towers should definitely be allowed at places like King and James or Main and Bay. I think it makes sense for an area like James North though, at least North of Wilson.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2014, 7:29 AM
stuckinexeter stuckinexeter is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 62
I don't remember when, but I do remember height restrictions were set for buildings in the core so as to not block the view from the mountain.... that was long ago....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2014, 2:03 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
I'm wondering if the whole project will come to pass though. I'm also wondering if maybe 22 stories is their opening offer and then look like they are compromising when they come back with plans for 15 stories.
Hopefully more like Burlington's 17 25 21-storey Strata than Hamilton's 6 11 12 15 10 6 "10-storey" Grand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 10:35 AM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Parking crunch? Tivoli hopes to stack cars
(CBC Hamilton, Samantha Craggs, June 20 2014)

The company behind the Tivoli condo project is proposing the city's mechanized car stacker to solve the development’s future parking problems.

The developers are proposing a 22-storey development at the old Tivoli Theatre, on James Street North, which could see as many as 65 condos in addition to commercial space and the restored theatre. But with more developments happening in the James North area, parking is increasingly an issue.

Diamante Holdings hopes to use an automated parking stacker. Such machines are common in New York and Toronto, but they’ve never come to Hamilton. The devices increase parking capacity of a lot by automatically lifting a car to a slot in a multi-level storage structure, where cars are stored more closely together, and then retrieving the car when the driver wants to use it again.

The company hopes to include an indoor one at the Tivoli site, which would fit the maximum amount of cars in the small space, said Berardo Diamante.

“As developments downtown increase, (car stackers) are going to come up more and more,” he said. “To have enough parking to get the site going, it’s just too tight otherwise.”

Parking, he said, is “something that can completely prevent things from being built.”


Read it in full here.


Setting aside the novelty of a car stacker, nine days ago this project was being described as consisting of "106 condo units and three commercial floors in addition to a restored theatre."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 2:04 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,800
Aren't car stackers really expensive?

On the number of units front, I would trust the official number rather than a news story.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 4:11 PM
thmx
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 10:01 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,321
Would be great if those were from a set of working drawings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2014, 1:28 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Aren't car stackers really expensive?

On the number of units front, I would trust the official number rather than a news story.
Not sure whose version is most credible at this stage. Just noting the discrepancy.

Stackers or otherwise, it's encouraging to see the diagrams relegate parking to sub-grade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2014, 12:18 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,889
As has already been pointed out, this project - if completed - will push the owner of the strip mall (M Beume) to make changes. That corner property could make a tremendous impact on the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 8:18 PM
mattgrande's Avatar
mattgrande mattgrande is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,245


Source

Quote:
MSA is pleased to unveil our most recent renderings for the Tivoli Theatre and Condominium. MSA is leading the design of this mixed-use condominium project developed by Diamante Investments, featuring the revitalization of Hamilton's storied Tivoli Vaudeville Theatre and a brand new 106 unit condominium tower.

Located in the heart of Hamilton, condominium residents will enjoy the benefits of brand new construction and modern amenities. The heritage conservation of the Tivoli Theatre will offer accessibility from James St. North, non-profit community space, new washrooms, coat check, and ticketing booths, as well as a street café and restaurant. It will also be minutes away from the new GO Station.

Stay tuned for updates as we work our way through the City’s development approvals processes!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 8:55 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,050
That looks fantastic! The podium allows for a consistent streetwall, and the tower would be a unique addition to the skyline (assuming the final design keeps the spirit of this rendering).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:43 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.