Urban vs Suburban - 2 styles enter, one style leaves!

[Policy Wonk]

Originally Posted by geotag277

How does a socially conscious member of society differentiate between a fast food worker flipping burgers who is being exploited by the TFW program versus one who is not?

How does a socially conscious member of society know that when they buy meat in a grocery store, the farm the meat came from isn't abusing animals?

You can keep coming back to this false equivalency as often as you like. 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 isn't just another lousy McJob.

Why can't this same infrastructure be put in place to protect 🞵🞵🞵 workers?

This isn't an OSHA issue. 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 isn't an occupation, it is the end result of societal and personal failures.

If legal, we could implement the concept of "brothels", a well known, well monitored safe place with security in place to protect the workers. Brothels can involve drug testing to ensure workers aren't abusing drugs, they can run background checks to ensure no human trafficking is involved, they can be required to have support systems and education programs to ensure workers have a path to a different career. Once fully legal and regulated there are plenty of opportunities to actually make a material impact in the lives of these people.

And for that not so insignificant number of "🞵🞵🞵 workers" who are addicted to drugs, in poor 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 health, or somehow under criminal influence are just going to stop?

You get to choose the acceptable risks that you are willing to take with whatever job you choose. Again, it comes down to having rules, regulations, and accountability in place to protect all involved.

\

So if the decision is 🞵🞵🞵 with a sketchy man... or losing your apartment is that sort of rational risk management in play? 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 isn't a job, it is a last gasp survival strategy for people who have few tools or resources available to them.

My only point with that sentence was those were two diametrically opposed experiences with 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵. Your friend likely saw the worst of the worst, and I likely was exposed to the best of the best.

I'm not going to ask you to elaborate just what it is you mean by "exposed to".

Other than presumably aesthetics and hopefully hygiene, what is fundamentally different about the transaction other than the johns who can afford to go more upmarket? How does that make for a positive life experience for the women involved on either end?