HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6041  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 12:26 AM
Matrix19 Matrix19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,539
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Awesome !!
     
     
  #6042  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 12:32 AM
Matrix19 Matrix19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,539
I took those shots this morning :



     
     
  #6043  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:01 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Some hi-resolution renderings of Mosaic Stadium:















Source: http://newmosaicstadium.com/index.php

Last edited by Prometheus; May 23, 2014 at 3:20 AM.
     
     
  #6044  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:07 AM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,932
Man that Regina stadium looks awesome! 'grats Rider fans.

Reminds me a lot of the Winnipeg stadium, but sort of the "sleeker 2014 version"


Calgary definitely needs some new sports digs...Saddledome is serviceable but its so dull inside, I don't like the seats (all plastic in the upper levels..really?? I don't ever recall sitting on old ass-numbing seats like that in the few other modern NHL venues I've been in when that high up) and McMahon...well......it certainly looks more impressive on TV that's for sure.
     
     
  #6045  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:17 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
We recently had an opportunity to chat with Mark Williams, Principal at HKS Architects, the designer of the New Mosaic Stadium.

Below are excerpts from our interview with Mark Williams.

Mark can you tell us what types of sports projects HKS has worked on?

We have recently worked on the Dallas Cowboys new stadium, the Indianapolis Colts stadium and are currently working on the New Minnesota Vikings new stadium.

How long have you been working on the new Mosaic Stadium project?

I first came to Saskatchewan five years ago and attended a Rider game and came away realizing there was something very special here and gained a great appreciation for the fan base, the city and province. We have been working on the design for this project for over a year. We have fully embraced the challenge of bringing the energy and excitement of Rider Nation into a new design that will be the greatest stadium in the Canadian Football League.

Can you tell us about your relationship with PCL?

We have had an incredible relationship with PCL. Having a partner with the expertise that PCL has is an incredible benefit. They have built some of the most incredible buildings, all over the world. These are very difficult projects so having a partner like PCL is a terrific advantage.

This stadium has been referred to as an “iconic stadium”, can you elaborate on that?

Many stadiums have a similar look and feel but when people see images of this stadium, they will know this is Mosaic Stadium, home of the Roughriders in Regina, Saskatchewan. It is a very unique design. It not only looks iconic but delivers an incredible fan experience.

Can you tell us more about stadium access and what is unique with the new Mosaic Stadium?

We have designed the stadium to provide 360 degree access and the entry points are at grade which means we have lowered the majority of the seating area into the ground. The benefit of that is that 68% of fans will be walking into the stadium and then going down to their seats instead of up. This also means that the height of the stadium will be lower.

How did the climate impact the design?

The climate was one of the biggest design drivers on this project. We took into account wind, snow and sun. We then sculpted the design to reduce the impact of extreme climate conditions.

What are some of the differences that fans will notice?

The first thing they will notice is the added room, additional amenities and ease of access. The seats are individual and wider, there will be more concessions and obviously more modern washrooms and easy access to those concessions and washrooms.

Mosaic Stadium will include a General Admission Lounge, can you tell us about that?

You don’t frequently see a lounge like this in stadiums for general admission ticket holders. The Roughriders wanted to ensure that their ticket holders had access to premium areas. This is a comfortable lounge with great food, drink and washroom amenities for everyone. It’s a great space for fans to hang out in prior to or during the game and its located directly behind the general admission seating on the west side with easy access to the park.

What is the capacity of the New Mosaic Stadium?

We designed the seating bowl to meet a capacity of 33,000 spectators but design allows for flexibility to increase the seating capacity to over 40,000 for events such as the Grey Cup. The south end zone is specifically designed to provide flexibility to increase capacity as desired. We have also created multiple configurations for smaller events such as concerts that might bring in smaller crowds.

What types of premium seating areas have you included?

Mosaic Stadium will include 38 luxury suites for Rider Corporate partners. It will also include an expanded Club Suite area and a premium Club Lounge. We also have a popular new offering that is most often referred to as Loge Seating. Loge seating is exterior seating with a private premium space configuration for parties of 4-8.
     
     
  #6046  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:18 AM
Udon'tknow's Avatar
Udon'tknow Udon'tknow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 360
Nice

All I can say is.. Damn! That's a sic looking stadium! Kudos to the Queen city!

     
     
  #6047  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:26 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by roccerfeller View Post
Reminds me a lot of the Winnipeg stadium, but sort of the "sleeker 2014 version"
That's what I was thinking. It's a bigger swankier version of IGF. Now we just need Toronto and Calgary to get their stadium issues resolved and we'll have great football stadia across the CFL.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #6048  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:28 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
We know these new stadia will allow for greater revenues for CFL owners as well as offering a more pleasurable viewing experience for the fans.

But one thing I haven't heard mentioned is the impact these new stadia will have on, in particular, import players. Coming to Regina, for example, they won't know what to expect. They likely would never have even heard of it and would assume it's nowhere and of no consequence; that is, until they step into that stadium!

Stadia like this are game changers for the CFL, both north and south of the border.
     
     
  #6049  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:56 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,070
With Hamilton/Ottawa coming on stream this season and Regina in the works it's really the first time in our history that we've had top quality stadia nationally. We can thank the CFL for that. None of this would exist without them and the league will likely get the pay back it deserves in higher revenues, more fans, hopefully a return to the fold in Toronto, and eventual expansion to Halifax, Quebec City, etc.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #6050  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 2:21 AM
Boreal's Avatar
Boreal Boreal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,704
Nice looking renderings there, Regina. Great city, and I couldn't think of a more deserving location, team and fan base to get it. I hope you all love it when it is done!
     
     
  #6051  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 3:06 AM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Canada... We hope you all get a chance to come and see our jewel on the prairie. I for one will make the journey to the east to see those new ones. Can't wait to get my season tickets for the first season (and many more) in this gorgeous stadium.
     
     
  #6052  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 3:08 AM
vaportrail's Avatar
vaportrail vaportrail is offline
That's no excuse!
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 387
I'm short on imagination but how are they expecting to put a dome on this, retractable or not?

'RIDERRRRRRS!!!
     
     
  #6053  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 4:42 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by vaportrail View Post
I'm short on imagination but how are they expecting to put a dome on this, retractable or not?

'RIDERRRRRRS!!!
My guess is that the sunken roof section on what will be the North endzone would be removed, then the South endzone would have a structure built up and an arched roof that would run from endzone to endzone and flare out to hit the spots missed by the sideline roof would be built. Just a complete guess though.
     
     
  #6054  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 4:42 AM
Dalreg's Avatar
Dalreg Dalreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,000
Nice looking stadium. Should do Regina and Saskatchewan for many years to come.

My question is with this roof and a N/S orientation what will the wind do? I can imagine a nice swirling wind in October being quite nasty in there?
__________________
Blow this popsicle stand
     
     
  #6055  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 7:30 AM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
. . . . . and apparently, this facility is to be FIFA-approved.
Canada is serious about a World Cup bid and Regina is just being smart in making sure it can be part of the action. Right now only two Stadiums in Canada are FIFA approved (not sure about BC Place, I assume it is number 3 with glass laid down), and just adding grass temporally would make this one of Canada's premier soccer facilities. Bumping this up to 45-55K might mean blowing up that video board temporarily but that's a small sacrifice to make.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan View Post
My guess is that the sunken roof section on what will be the North endzone would be removed, then the South endzone would have a structure built up and an arched roof that would run from endzone to endzone and flare out to hit the spots missed by the sideline roof would be built. Just a complete guess though.
It's a good guess. But the roof argument is DOA. Every stadium falls Into the trap where a new "planned" roof always ends up costing close to (or in some cases more) then what it cost to build the original stadium. Newer roof technology always comes along which makes whatever planned roof for the future redundant and obsolete. I am sure design took it into account but from looking at the angles and roofing in this render they took a large amount of effort in crafting this roof to block out a considerable amount of the elements and create a neutral environment for the fans.

It would be chapter down the road to build a new arena versus modding this with a retractable roof.

All in all great design. This is the approach Canada should take in taking European stadium design which gives you the best bang for your buck but still being able to implement and include North American standards such as club seats and boxes which still aren't mainstream in Europe (aside from luxury levels and royal boxes lol).

This looks nothing like IGF though. People can't compare the two. You compare the renders IGF was convinced differently. Regina's bowl is sunken more into the ground, the angles on the roof were planned properly for snow, as was the bowl (no flooding here), also the fact even that so much space is left from the seats to the irks let's you know that because of snow they had to provide that extra room (this differs from industry trends which try to put the fans as close as possible). These are apples and oranges. The only way they compare is if Regina botched materials and goes to the scrap heap to find materials as what has happened Winnipeg (amazing high end plan.. botched execution + poor materials = all the awkward issues Winnipeg is having now with IGF).

HKS makes sense as to how they were chosen since this borrows many elements from some of their previous projects. This project borrows a lot from the Vikings new stadium, a lot of this stadiums bones (parts of the bowl) are carved out from that plan when you compare the two.

The one shiny toy I wish that could be added is a center hung video board. You have thee awkward video boards in Winnipeg which are to small so you can fit in the extra seats, same thing with Regina here. You could easily suspend a 4 panel board like what is done in Dallas in the centre but maybe snow and wind put a damper on that idea (or simply cost, a toy like that would cost $10 million+ on its own likely). It's a dream that isn't really doable but are very least, going against the trend of small video boards that are being placed here in Canada. Facilities realize now that video screens are needed to compete with fans whom can easily justify sitting at home with he HD big screen versus going to the game (I know it sound crazy but it's true). Large video broads for fans more options for enjoying the game, especially if they have some crummy seats.

Last edited by osmo; May 23, 2014 at 7:58 AM.
     
     
  #6056  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 10:08 AM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
Nice looking stadium. Should do Regina and Saskatchewan for many years to come.

My question is with this roof and a N/S orientation what will the wind do? I can imagine a nice swirling wind in October being quite nasty in there?
According to the architect they took 100 years of climate data (wind, temp, rain and snow) and designed the stadium to mitigate as much as possible all of those concerns.
     
     
  #6057  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 12:18 PM
EdFromOttawa EdFromOttawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 365
ITT: F**k Calgary and everything it's ever stood for.


Have we all forgotten what a sorry state the stadiums of Montreal are in? Olympic is in unplayeable condition and Molson is even worse imo (hideous stained concrete bleacher stands with uncomfortable back-less aluminum benches and zero actual amenities? ). Saputo is not bad but can't be configured for CFL.

Where's the clamour for change in Montreal?
     
     
  #6058  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:34 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
The only way they compare is if Regina botched materials and goes to the scrap heap to find materials as what has happened Winnipeg (amazing high end plan.. botched execution + poor materials = all the awkward issues Winnipeg is having now with IGF).
Not saying that there weren't issues with IGF, but what are the problems with materials?

Also, not sure what you consider to be an adequately large video screen, but the ones in Winnipeg are 120 x 30 which makes them among the biggest you will find in North American stadiums...
     
     
  #6059  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 1:38 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdFromOttawa View Post
ITT: F**k Calgary and everything it's ever stood for.


Have we all forgotten what a sorry state the stadiums of Montreal are in? Olympic is in unplayeable condition and Molson is even worse imo (hideous stained concrete bleacher stands with uncomfortable back-less aluminum benches and zero actual amenities? ). Saputo is not bad but can't be configured for CFL.

Where's the clamour for change in Montreal?
Montreal has pissed away so much money on mediocre stadiums I doubt you'll find much appetite to spend any more.

Don't forget, Montreal also had the Automotive Stadium which lasted all of what, 15 years? Jarry Park was another quasi-temporary publicly funded stadium. Saputo is fine but quite barebones, Molson is ancient but seems to have some sort of antique Fenway-style appeal, and the billion-dollar baby Big O looks spectacular on postcards but like so many Olympic Stadiums in the past is impractical for anything but track and field events with 75,000 people in the stands.

I think the Als and the Impact are going to have to learn to love their facilities, because I doubt anything new is going to be built soon. Of course, the only exception would be the baseball stadium that would have to go up in the unlikely event that major league baseball returns there.
     
     
  #6060  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 2:46 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Don't worry. Ken King said there would be an announcement on Calgary's arena soon.






(He said that 3 years ago)
More like 8 years ago.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:16 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.