HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7001  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 2:42 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Denver put up bollards on the 15th Street bike lane yesterday, officially making it a cycletrack.


from @downtowndenver on twitter
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7002  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 2:48 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
They should be treated as they are in Mumbai, India- left in the streets or confined to a house in the village.
Millions here are in their houses in their towns, too. A few push grocery carts around, and, stay in subsidized flop houses.

There will be more of both in the future.

Oh, there are millions who have a hard time walking more than 100 meters, but, are very adapt at answering the phone and using computers. Often, rather brilliant folk.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7003  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 2:50 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
officially making it a cycletrack.
Officially making it the least utilized 8-feet of pavement in all of downtown Denver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7004  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 3:24 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Denver put up bollards on the 15th Street bike lane yesterday, officially making it a cycletrack.


from @downtowndenver on twitter
Nice looking free bus shuttle lane, too.

I think the competition for no car lanes will be between free buses and bicycles.

Buses and bikes sharing the same lane would be scary.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7005  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 3:35 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
Oh, there are millions who have a hard time walking more than 100 meters, but, are very adapt at answering the phone and using computers. Often, rather brilliant folk.
But if they can't get to a desk their utility decreases dramatically for a producer.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7006  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 3:42 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
But if they can't get to a desk their utility decreases dramatically for a producer.
Take car with handicapped sticker to park-n-ride, take light rail (access via ramp) downtown-exit via ramp, take mall-shuttle with handicapped boarding, exit shuttle same way. Walk 100 meters to office building, sit in lobby for 10 minutes, take elevator and get to work.

Many people are partially handicapped, particularly those that use canes. These are people that can walk a good distance- say 300 meters, but, have to use a cane to maintain stability. Walking up stairs is extremely difficult for them, but a single step up or down is easy.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7007  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 3:53 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
Take car with handicapped sticker to park-n-ride, take light rail (access via ramp) downtown-exit via ramp, take mall-shuttle with handicapped boarding, exit shuttle same way. Walk 100 meters to office building, sit in lobby for 10 minutes, take elevator and get to work.
All subsidized generously by the taxpayers due to the economic rents provided courtesy of the ADA.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7008  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 3:57 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
Buses and bikes sharing the same lane would be scary.
Actually not all that uncommon on low-speed streets.

But it doesn't work very well. Bikes & buses constantly pass each other, buses going faster on straightaways and bikes going faster in congested areas & at bus stops, and cars tend to ignore the restrictions completely and drive in the lane anyway.


DC (left), Seattle (center), Milwaukee (right). Milwaukee photo from David Gleason on flickr.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7009  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 5:20 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Actually not all that uncommon on low-speed streets.

But it doesn't work very well. Bikes & buses constantly pass each other, buses going faster on straightaways and bikes going faster in congested areas & at bus stops, and cars tend to ignore the restrictions completely and drive in the lane anyway.
I hate these for the the reasons you state above. Although not a bus/bike lane, it's the same issues 12th Ave has through Cap Hill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7010  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 7:02 PM
Scottk's Avatar
Scottk Scottk is offline
Denver
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
I finally broke down and scoped the Lodo Bus station out.

My objections that I have made for years are still valid. The layout stinks in terms of no platform to platform transfer between light rail and commuter rail, and, no same seat north/south connections.
Wizened, I see you on these boards constantly lamenting the lack of platform to platform transfer and same seat connections.

Yet, when I think of my trip to Italy a few months ago, and the great train stations I saw there, the stations really are not all that different from Union Station.

Take for example, Milano Centrale. This station serves as Milan's Grand Central. All of the regional trains begin and end at Milano Centrale. There is no through service. Milano Centrale is a stub station, just like Union Station, and even the central station in (gasp) Paris!

To access the metro required a walk of several hundred meters through the station, and down several flights of stairs. Similar to accessing the lightrail in Denver. Now admittedly, Milano Centrale is significantly better than Union Station because you never have to leave the actual station to access other modes of transit. But, my point is still the same. There are many great, functioning stations around the world that are "stub" stations. Most of these stations also do not have platform to platform transfers between modes. Accessing the subway in Paris & Milan is actually quite a pain in the ass, and certainly no worse than Union Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7011  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 7:07 PM
seventwenty's Avatar
seventwenty seventwenty is offline
I took a bus pic, CIRRUS
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Soon to be banned
Posts: 1,697
Scott, please rank these stations on a global scale of C to F.
__________________
The happy & obtuse bro.

"Of course you're right." Cirrus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7012  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 10:06 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottk View Post
All of the regional trains begin and end at Milano Centrale. There is no through service. Milano Centrale is a stub station, just like Union Station, and even the central station in (gasp) Paris!
Stub stations are fine if a stub is your only choice. The disappointing thing about Denver is that it wouldn't have been particularly hard to make it a through station instead. In Milan, there's nowhere to go. The tracks just end in the middle of the city. So /shrug/, stub station it is. But in Denver, the tracks pick right up again just a couple of blocks later. In fact, there ARE through tracks, a little bit further up the CPV. Making Denver a through station is totally feasible (though more expensive).

But I don't think it's as big a problem as maybe some others think. It makes little difference for commuter-oriented lines like in Fastracks. Where it will be a problem is if we ever get around to Front Range rail.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads

Last edited by Cirrus; May 22, 2014 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7013  
Old Posted May 22, 2014, 11:21 PM
CPVLIVE's Avatar
CPVLIVE CPVLIVE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 576
For those who haven't yet gotten their fill of US photos - Here's some I took early at the celebration and some days later. Still couldn't access the bridge.

































Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7014  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 12:19 AM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Where it will be a problem is if we ever get around to Front Range rail.
Even then I don't think it'll be a real problem, because the Front Range rail is likely to be out in the valley, along the CML, adjacent to the light rail. It doesn't seem like it'd take an incredible feat of engineering to provide for platforms and transfers across the light rail tracks - or some re-configuration out there. Then it's a through station, with only a whopping 60 extra feet of walking vs. what light rail commuters have to do today.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7015  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 3:13 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
Front Range rail is likely to be out in the valley, along the CML, adjacent to the light rail.
Probably right. It still makes me sad that the historic depot building is no longer the real hub of the station, but I guess that ship has sailed. If we mentally accept that the 17th Street promenade is the new Union Station main hall, then the CML is just as good as the commuter rail canopy.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7016  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 3:13 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Also, what is a C&O railcar doing in Denver?
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7017  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 3:35 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Probably right. It still makes me sad that the historic depot building is no longer the real hub of the station, but I guess that ship has sailed. If we mentally accept that the 17th Street promenade is the new Union Station main hall, then the CML is just as good as the commuter rail canopy.
It depends on what format Front Range Rail ends up being. Given the infrastructure nightmare that Front Range Rail would be through the southern side of the Metro it's likely that the initial stages of any Front Range rail system will be in the north. That right there will have us seeing regional rail arriving at the Train Hall for a number of years. By the time the southern portion is really considered I would hope that the LRT platform could be included in a second train hall since the whole project is going to be ungodly expensive (not I-70 rail expensive, but still ungodly expensive).
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7018  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 8:09 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
It depends on what format Front Range Rail ends up being. Given the infrastructure nightmare that Front Range Rail would be through the southern side of the Metro it's likely that the initial stages of any Front Range rail system will be in the north. That right there will have us seeing regional rail arriving at the Train Hall for a number of years. By the time the southern portion is really considered I would hope that the LRT platform could be included in a second train hall since the whole project is going to be ungodly expensive (not I-70 rail expensive, but still ungodly expensive).
The short term solution for heavy rail connections to Lodo from the South is to either build a new station or upgrade a current light rail station that parallels the Joint line freight lines to do the job.

IMO, the best place would be Broadway, and, hopefully, the apartment build out will not be so rapid that the necessary right of way for a terminal station at that location would be consumed. Room needs to be available for at least 2 and preferably 4 terminating tracks.

Passengers from the south via commuter rail, or a connecting line to Amtrak at Pueblo (hopefully) could then take either the light rail or buses that would drop passengers off at Union Station. Likewise, train travelers could single transfer to the Southwest, TRex, Corridor, and, I-225 lines. In terms of interconnectivity, this station would be 2nd to DUS.

ALL light rail station north of Broadway (except Alameda) have not enough room for both adding platforms and making a small heavy rail switch yard needed for multiple track access.

Once that is en place, then the connection to the Light Rail station could be dealt with, possibly with something like an express light rail shuttle.

Regardless, no matter what solution to this is made, unless direct access is provided somehow, people traveling on heavy rail from the south will have to carry their own baggage if they desire heavy rail connections from DUS. (This includes the light rail option, with the Underground Connection.)
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf

Last edited by Wizened Variations; May 23, 2014 at 9:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7019  
Old Posted May 23, 2014, 9:01 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Anybody want a job in Boulder?

Quote:
Originally Posted by APA
Assistant Director for Sustainable Transportation Systems
Job #48356
University of Colorado Boulder
Boulder, CO
https://www.planning.org/jobs/search/listing/?AdID=48356

Assistant Director for Sustainable Transportation Systems develops strategies and processes for his/her division. The Sustainable Transportation Systems division provides a broad range of transportation-related services, including but not limited to: transportation demand management programs and services, transit services, fleet operations and compliance, garage operations, and driver training.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7020  
Old Posted May 24, 2014, 3:53 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Stub stations are fine if a stub is your only choice. The disappointing thing about Denver is that it wouldn't have been particularly hard to make it a through station instead. In Milan, there's nowhere to go. The tracks just end in the middle of the city. So /shrug/, stub station it is. But in Denver, the tracks pick right up again just a couple of blocks later. In fact, there ARE through tracks, a little bit further up the CPV. Making Denver a through station is totally feasible (though more expensive).

But I don't think it's as big a problem as maybe some others think. It makes little difference for commuter-oriented lines like in Fastracks. Where it will be a problem is if we ever get around to Front Range rail.
The most important current problem with DUS is that it is not designed to facilitate travel through (due to very poor transportation planning, bottom line).*

Let's say one lives near the Osage Station on the light rail and wants to go to the DIA line (being built) to the 40th and Colorado Station, which is perhaps 5 or 6 miles as the crow flies. He or she in 2020 will have two options: the first, to take a DUS light rail train to DUS Light, walk almost the length of the Underground buying tickets (hopefully) en route, walking to the platform that the DIA train will use, wait for the train (unless timing is perfect), catch the train and ride the 4 or so miles to the 40th and Colorado Station. The 2nd option (in 2020 or so) will be to take the light rail to the 38th Street Station,wait for a DIA bound train, travel one stop and get off? How long will this take to travel the 5 or 6 miles as the crow flies between the Osage Station and the 40th and Colorado Station? In both cases, I suspect during higher frequency times (rush hour) close to 45 minutes, which works out to an average speed of 6 mph (~10 kph). Going the other way- from the 40th and Colorado Station to Osage would be a bit faster, as the frequencies of the light rail that go from DUS Light to Osage are higher than the frequencies of the DIA line will be. In this case, perhaps 8 or even 9 mph (~15 kph)

This type of timing scheme applies to any rider that enters DUS via light rail and then transfers to the heavy rail, and visa versa.

This type of problem extends also to the Bus Station. As the station is huge (due to it filling a space originally meant to contain DUS light rail) a higher percentage of buses that serve local communities in a 5 mile radius in an arc north of Colfax will now stop at the Underground in their route. How will this, for example, affect north-south local bus schedules for those who use buses that have no need to travel through the DUS Station Complex?

While having such buses serve commuters going downtown is a positive, a huge percentage of local bus traffic has no need to have to travel through the Underground as the riders do not have Lodo as a final destination.

(I will admit that east-west bus traffic through the Underground will be made more efficient, as the time for buses to enter and exit the Underground in many cases will be less than such times at the old Market Street Station.)

Problems, Cirrus, will start long before any heavy rail option from the south is considered, as more and more users discover that the system works poorly (unnecessarily long travel times) if one has to travel THROUGH downtown.DUS Station will add 20 - 40 minutes to travel times via rail in such cases.** In addition, 10 - 20 minutes to bus travel time for current riders on those bus routes that will now be forced to either terminate at the Underground that do not now, or to routes which up to this time did not go downtown.

This all is a reflection on the DUS Station complex design which now is set in concrete.

*The reason this planning boondoggle occurred can largely be traced to the positioning of the Pepsi Center, combined with the width of the track corridor now used for light rail and heavy rail freight. Basically, commercial property development, as a function of total area usage of the old rail yards was maximized at the expense of public transportation users. RTD seems to have little political choice but to build the station complex in the area provided for them by those who sought (and seek) to use DUS to enhance property value. Regrettably, RTD will bear the brunt of the blame and the Joe Caldaras of this world will unequivocally condemn RTD, without blaming private parties who also were involved.
**Similar timing problems will also exist for travel between stations on different heavy rail lines in the future as the system will have no transfer points between lines besides DUS.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf

Last edited by Wizened Variations; May 24, 2014 at 4:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:05 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.