Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain
As an early millennial, I got my drivers around 18, that said that was driven by my living location and the need to drive. If I lived where I live now (middle ring suburb, with excellent transit) I likely wouldn't bother, the cost/stress-benefit relation wouldn't work (it barely made sense at that point, early '00's pre-smartphones and with 60-80c gas).
|
This is something I don't "get" with the current generation of teens. I can understand not wanting to waste money on a car. I can understand not wanting to spend the money on insurance when you're 19. I can understand fuel costs and the inconvenience of dealing with everything related to maintenance.
But not getting the license itself? It's baffling. All it takes is a small change in public transit and suddenly life becomes very difficult. Or moving to a different town/city for a work opportunity. Or going on damn near any vacation in North America - doing so without being able to drive limits you so much.
I guess we'll see what happens when these kids actually become adults, which seems to be around 23-25 these days. Heck, I didn't get my license right away (all my friends did on their 16th birthday, practically) but by my early 20s, I recognized how damned inconvenient it was. The only reason I survived without one for so long was that I was basically dirt poor, and in Manitoba your driving record really isn't that big of a deal. The monthly bus pass was all I could afford for transportation and vacations? lol. But a lot of the kids doing this are well off, and have a lot more opportunities than I did at their ages. I just don't see why a test and a $40 fee is such a big impediment. Hell, have the license, don't drive for 5 or 6 years, and if you ever DO get a vehicle, you'll start off with a stellar driving record! I'd be pushing heavily for this if I was a parent. Maybe I'm just looking at my own experience and seeing how much it impaired me, and I couldn't even dream of affording a car until I was 25 or so.