HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


    Sutton Place Nova Centre in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Halifax Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3901  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 7:39 PM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
There was actually a lively debate about the convention centre siting in this thread.. back in 2008.



I agree with this. These two blocks were terrible prior to this development. Even the lower block with the Herald building was ugly and fit in poorly with the rest of Argyle Street. Most of the ground floor of the Herald was blank walls. The building itself was not a loss and the Nova Centre looks like it will be a dramatic improvement, even if it's not without its own flaws or compromises.
Totally. And wasn't much of the lot across from different bars on Argyle just a big, empty, ugly parking lot?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3902  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 7:49 PM
hokus83 hokus83 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 284
My hugest pet peeve about the design is that it fit in very poorly with the surrounding area, I wish it had a bit more color to it like the Montreal convention center. Argyle and the area around it has so much character to it that I feel this needs a bit more colourful feel to it, that boat has probably already sailed on the design aspect, I really wish the first 3 or 4 floors had something a little more interesting at street level than walls of clear glass
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3903  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 9:32 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by hokus83 View Post
My hugest pet peeve about the design is that it fit in very poorly with the surrounding area, I wish it had a bit more color to it like the Montreal convention center. Argyle and the area around it has so much character to it that I feel this needs a bit more colourful feel to it, that boat has probably already sailed on the design aspect[/IMG]
I bet design elements like the colours of the building or style of the art installations could still be changed.

I agree that the colours come off a bit bland in the renderings. The ballroom will have some bright blue spandrel and the rest will be grey (spandrel or stone at ground level) or clear.

Hopefully the public art will be interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3904  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 9:36 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by counterfactual View Post
Totally. And wasn't much of the lot across from different bars on Argyle just a big, empty, ugly parking lot?
Before Rank acquired the lots the Herald building covered the entirety of the lower block and the Midtown was on the northeast corner of the upper block. I've seen photos from the 70's and 80's of other small buildings on the upper block but I think they were torn down 15+ years ago (there used to be similar small buildings where the MetroPark is today, and the TexPark was on the United Gulf site).

Around 2006 or so there was a proposal for the Midtown site that would have covered maybe 1/3-1/4 of the north end of that block, but it wasn't approved:


Source


In retrospect it's kind of ironic because the same STV crowd that shot this one down paved the way for the much larger Nova Centre project on this site. Back when the Midtown was proposed it registered as a major, high-quality project in Halifax; back then I never would have expected something like the Nova Centre to be proposed a few years later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3905  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 10:06 PM
hokus83 hokus83 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Before Rank acquired the lots the Herald building covered the entirety of the lower block and the Midtown was on the northeast corner of the upper block. I've seen photos from the 70's and 80's of other small buildings on the upper block but I think they were torn down 15+ years ago (there used to be similar small buildings where the MetroPark is today, and the TexPark was on the United Gulf site).

Around 2006 or so there was a proposal for the Midtown site that would have covered maybe 1/3-1/4 of the north end of that block, but it wasn't approved:


Source

This is the kind of thing I would love to see on Market street and fill one of the vacant lots on both Market and Prince and Market and Sackville. I really think this its going to be important to fill those holes with something once the Nova Centre is built and hopefully a proposal and approval of a midrise at each corner would wouldn't be such of a issue now that we have this being built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3906  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 10:48 PM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Before Rank acquired the lots the Herald building covered the entirety of the lower block and the Midtown was on the northeast corner of the upper block. I've seen photos from the 70's and 80's of other small buildings on the upper block but I think they were torn down 15+ years ago (there used to be similar small buildings where the MetroPark is today, and the TexPark was on the United Gulf site).

Around 2006 or so there was a proposal for the Midtown site that would have covered maybe 1/3-1/4 of the north end of that block, but it wasn't approved:


Source


In retrospect it's kind of ironic because the same STV crowd that shot this one down paved the way for the much larger Nova Centre project on this site. Back when the Midtown was proposed it registered as a major, high-quality project in Halifax; back then I never would have expected something like the Nova Centre to be proposed a few years later.
Street level design could be much better, but not bad at all.

I'd love to see a consultant or economist crunch some numbers and try to estimate how many great developments and economic benefits / development has been lost over the years, caused by the STVers and all the great proposals these conniving jerks have killed over the years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3907  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 11:46 PM
Colin May Colin May is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by counterfactual View Post
Street level design could be much better, but not bad at all.

I'd love to see a consultant or economist crunch some numbers and try to estimate how many great developments and economic benefits / development has been lost over the years, caused by the STVers and all the great proposals these conniving jerks have killed over the years.
Far better to assess the massive and ongoing subsidies to the industrial parks, most of which have very little industry and huge amounts of retail. Land which was sold well below the cost of staff, whose sole job was promoting and selling the areas, and not to forget the cost of surveys, rock breaking, levelling of lots,streets, sewer, water, sidewalks, and maintenance of property which belonged to the province.
The original development of Burnside was a private sector effort but once Dartmouth decided to become a developer the private Commodore Commercial Estates could not compete with taxpayer subsidised development primarily designed to steal businesses from Halifax.

The land that is now Dartmouth Crossing was owned by the Whebby family and Dartmouth made sure that the property was never within the development boundary citing the lack of water and sewer capacity.
The office tower boom of 30+ years ago was aided by the stubborness of Premier Peckford of Newfoundland and the resultant move of oil rigs and offices to Halifax which brought lots of activity and many dry holes, an expanding federal and provincial civil service also helped developers as governments willingly became anchor tenants on long term leases and the landlord then offered better rates to tenants who needed less space.
Queens Square in downtown Dartmouth was a high rise flop for many years until the federal government took some office space and the province also took space.
With federal downsizing and cost cutting, a deeply indebted province, and more cost conscience lawyers and accountants the glory days of big tenants anchoring new developments may be gone. And the HECC approving five 5 storey office towers against the advice of the Downtown Dartmouth Business Commission a shift of office space out of the center may increase.
The Turner report on office space demand of several years ago was so realistic and uncomfortable for HRM staff that they delayed tabling it at council and stamped every page 'DRAFT' and then it disappeared from all discussion at city hall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3908  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2014, 12:49 AM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin May View Post
Far better to assess the massive and ongoing subsidies to the industrial parks, most of which have very little industry and huge amounts of retail. Land which was sold well below the cost of staff, whose sole job was promoting and selling the areas, and not to forget the cost of surveys, rock breaking, levelling of lots,streets, sewer, water, sidewalks, and maintenance of property which belonged to the province.
The original development of Burnside was a private sector effort but once Dartmouth decided to become a developer the private Commodore Commercial Estates could not compete with taxpayer subsidised development primarily designed to steal businesses from Halifax.

The land that is now Dartmouth Crossing was owned by the Whebby family and Dartmouth made sure that the property was never within the development boundary citing the lack of water and sewer capacity.
The office tower boom of 30+ years ago was aided by the stubborness of Premier Peckford of Newfoundland and the resultant move of oil rigs and offices to Halifax which brought lots of activity and many dry holes, an expanding federal and provincial civil service also helped developers as governments willingly became anchor tenants on long term leases and the landlord then offered better rates to tenants who needed less space.
Queens Square in downtown Dartmouth was a high rise flop for many years until the federal government took some office space and the province also took space.
With federal downsizing and cost cutting, a deeply indebted province, and more cost conscience lawyers and accountants the glory days of big tenants anchoring new developments may be gone. And the HECC approving five 5 storey office towers against the advice of the Downtown Dartmouth Business Commission a shift of office space out of the center may increase.
The Turner report on office space demand of several years ago was so realistic and uncomfortable for HRM staff that they delayed tabling it at council and stamped every page 'DRAFT' and then it disappeared from all discussion at city hall.
You don't have to say so twice. I'd be on board with that as well.

We all know about these events, how things happened, from a macro level. But what I want to know, is who was driving these changes? Was it just lazy HRM staff with little direction? Or something more sinister?

Why would the Turner Report be so "uncomfortable" for HRM staff? It showed they were complicit in killing office occupancy downtown?

I suppose one benefit of amalgamation is that it ended this sort of douchebag development policy, with different sprawl communities selling off their lands in the middle of nowhere, for cheap, to suck business out of the downtown core. A veritable race to the bottom for increasingly shrinking dollars, as land was sold cheaper and cheaper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3909  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2014, 2:14 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Many thanks to Ziobrop for all the construction pictures of the Nova Centre. I find it fascinating to see how the car ramps are being constructed. I am looking forwarded to seeing your ongoing Roy Building demolition and construction pictures.

(source: Ziobrop - http://fillingtheholehfx.tumblr.com/ )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3910  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2014, 12:19 PM
Ziobrop's Avatar
Ziobrop Ziobrop is offline
armchairitect
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Halifax
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
Many thanks to Ziobrop for all the construction pictures of the Nova Centre. I find it fascinating to see how the car ramps are being constructed. I am looking forwarded to seeing your ongoing Roy Building demolition and construction pictures.
Thanks,
Have you also Seen this One - Progress on 1592 Barrington http://cdplus.tumblr.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3911  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2014, 9:59 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
The live video feed is not working; but I'm listening to the audio while I clear a whole bunch of things at work.
The first speaker...riot. You'd think the world would end if we approved Nova Centre. Good for council to sticking to the process and calling people out for not sticking to the topic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3912  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2014, 10:15 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
As I feared - the speakers are not sticking to topic. It's going from talking about fire and brimstone; the 3 level of government contributions to the titanic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3913  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2014, 10:49 PM
DigitalNinja DigitalNinja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 966
Are they just having the discussion tonight? Or are they going to vote on the amendments?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3914  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 12:39 AM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
The live video feed is not working; but I'm listening to the audio while I clear a whole bunch of things at work.
The first speaker...riot. You'd think the world would end if we approved Nova Centre. Good for council to sticking to the process and calling people out for not sticking to the topic.
It's the usual STV / Heritage Trust People (they're the same group). They basically said the Nova Centre would lead to:

* Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling.
* Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
* The dead rising from the grave.
* Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria.

A few developers like Ghosn and Chedrawe voiced moderate support.

And then a couple random people who gave a few thoughts, for and against.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3915  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 12:53 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by counterfactual View Post
It's the usual STV / Heritage Trust People (they're the same group). They basically said the Nova Centre would lead to:

* Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling.
* Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
* The dead rising from the grave.
* Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria.

A few developers like Ghosn and Chedrawe voiced moderate support.

And then a couple random people who gave a few thoughts, for and against.
Oh, so it's just a normal public hearing about any development taller than 2 floors downtown. Gotcha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3916  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 1:01 AM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Approved. Watts was the only vote against. Still some concerns about closing Grafton but time to move on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3917  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 1:27 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,830
I'm not sure Watts has ever voted in favor of any development. Seriously.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3918  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 1:35 AM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,772
I can't think of any Keith.
__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3919  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 2:32 AM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,200
None of the negative nellies mentioned what a blight Grafton St. was for 35 years on downtown. How can a vibrant Convention Centre be worse than the weed infested abandoned lot that sat beside the Midtown for so long? What would infuse more life to the street? I didn't hear any suggestions.

Blight on downtown gone with the negative nellies:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.646071,-6...3m4!1e1!3m2!1sNTeQjPkFOnFAEjDGQ85kPQ!2e0
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3920  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 4:02 AM
teddifax's Avatar
teddifax teddifax is offline
Halifax Promoter!
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,112
Here, here!!! That picture was a great reminder to the turn-around going on with this development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.