HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4221  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 7:39 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I've just wondered sometimes if the Canada Line's higher train capacity is worth its much slower average speed
There is no reason these two should be mutually exclusive
     
     
  #4222  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 7:42 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
Montréal Metro , 152m , 70km/h.
     
     
  #4223  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 7:51 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
There is no reason these two should be mutually exclusive
They are here so that's what I assumed. Operating speed is the same but the LIM trains (Expo and Millennium Lines) accelerate much faster compared to the Canada Line which is standard third rail. It is a very noticeable difference when you ride both technologies in one day.
     
     
  #4224  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 8:05 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Vancouver Skytrain: Top speed 90 km/h (Expo/Millennium), 80 km/h (Canada), average speed 45 km/h
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4225  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 8:52 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Sorry to post twice in a row, but I just saw that the city of Calgary just approved the City Centre Cycle Track Network with just a couple amendments such as the 1st Street Section being removed. Amazing that it is going ahead!

The whole network can be seen here:

http://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/...%20cycle%20track/cycle-track-network.pdf
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4226  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 9:41 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
They are here so that's what I assumed. Operating speed is the same but the LIM trains (Expo and Millennium Lines) accelerate much faster compared to the Canada Line which is standard third rail. It is a very noticeable difference when you ride both technologies in one day.
Skytrain probably isn't the fastest accelerating metro technology (I don't have any stats to hand...), but even if it was the cars could simply be made wider to increase capacity.

That said, I was impressed by the speed of Skytrain. It certainly seems faster than the snails' pace C-Train.
     
     
  #4227  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 9:48 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Skytrain probably isn't the fastest accelerating metro technology (I don't have any stats to hand...), but even if it was the cars could simply be made wider to increase capacity.

That said, I was impressed by the speed of Skytrain. It certainly seems faster than the snails' pace C-Train.
I'm sure there are faster metros as well, but at this point I'd rather keep with the technology we have rather than try and introduce new ones (like the Canada Line). I'm also not sure if it would be possible to make the cars wider, it's possible that the tunnels or guideways overall could be too narrow.
     
     
  #4228  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 9:59 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I'm sure there are faster metros as well, but at this point I'd rather keep with the technology we have rather than try and introduce new ones (like the Canada Line). I'm also not sure if it would be possible to make the cars wider, it's possible that the tunnels or guideways overall could be too narrow.
Absolutely there is nothing wrong with keeping the LIM technology for future lines and of course wider trains can't be used on existing lines. I'm just saying there is no tradeoff required of speed/capacity. An underground Broadway line built with long platforms, wide trainsets and using Skytrain technology could be extremely fast and high capacity.
     
     
  #4229  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 10:32 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
     
     
  #4230  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 11:07 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Absolutely there is nothing wrong with keeping the LIM technology for future lines and of course wider trains can't be used on existing lines. I'm just saying there is no tradeoff required of speed/capacity. An underground Broadway line built with long platforms, wide trainsets and using Skytrain technology could be extremely fast and high capacity.
Well the Broadway Line will likely be an extension of the Evergreen Line from Coquitlam so its lengths and widths will have to be the same as theirs, which is unfortunate since the Broadway leg will be the busiest. But that's in the far future, so we'll see what happens. But I see your point, there's a lot more to capacity than car size.
     
     
  #4231  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2014, 11:48 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,971
80 meter platforms will do just fine along Broadway, given skytrains speed and frequency. That is skytrain's ace in the hole, its potential frequency.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #4232  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 3:31 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
     
     
  #4233  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 3:49 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Watching that Montreal video reminded me of Polka Dot Door. Captain Kangaroo and Reading Rainbow all at the same time....

Above ground, looking at the mess on Eglinton, you would never guess how slick the tunnels are underground.
     
     
  #4234  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 2:52 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
photos of the first new switch on the TTC streetcar network since the early 1990's.. This is for the cherry street streetcar extension which will open in 2016 after the Pan Am games have been completed and the village converted to a regular neighbourhood. A second new switch will be built later in the year as well, to access the new Leslie Street Barns.



http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showthread....trackage-(City-of-Toronto-TTC-U-C)/page7
     
     
  #4235  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 5:18 AM
spaceprobe spaceprobe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CalTorVan
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Skytrain probably isn't the fastest accelerating metro technology (I don't have any stats to hand...), but even if it was the cars could simply be made wider to increase capacity.

That said, I was impressed by the speed of Skytrain. It certainly seems faster than the snails' pace C-Train.
c-train isn't really snails pace. It's pretty fast when it is separated from traffic and traffic lights (ie outside of downtown). However, in downtown, it feels more like TTC streetcars than a rapid transit line. Buses can often get across downtown faster then the Ctrain!
     
     
  #4236  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 6:24 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,955
Vancouver was stupid to build the Canada Line the way it did. Not only are the stations ridiculously small but can only be expanded to 50 meter which was NOT wwhat we were promised as they were suppose to be 60 meter stations or 3 subway cars.

The standard Metro cars are noticeable slower moving than SkyTrain during the trip, acceleration, and deceleration, everyone notices and comments on it. The system is already over capacity and has solved little. It is faster coming from Richmond but they don't run near as frequently as the BLine buses did to Richmond Centre. It is slower for people coming in from Delta/South Surrey/White Rock due to the transfer and you never get a seat.

This was all Campbell's doing and we are stuck with it. FWI.........this has nothing to do with it being a PPP but rather Campbell wanting to build anything in time for the Olympics and to hell with the actual transit users of the city after that.

Question about the Cherry Streetcar.................Cherry runs N/S and yet the line is less than 1 km. Does that mean someone going downtown is going to have to take a 5 minute streetcar ride only to have to transfer at King or will it become part of the King route?
     
     
  #4237  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 7:46 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Vancouver was stupid to build the Canada Line the way it did. Not only are the stations ridiculously small but can only be expanded to 50 meter which was NOT wwhat we were promised as they were suppose to be 60 meter stations or 3 subway cars.

The standard Metro cars are noticeable slower moving than SkyTrain during the trip, acceleration, and deceleration, everyone notices and comments on it. The system is already over capacity and has solved little. It is faster coming from Richmond but they don't run near as frequently as the BLine buses did to Richmond Centre. It is slower for people coming in from Delta/South Surrey/White Rock due to the transfer and you never get a seat.

This was all Campbell's doing and we are stuck with it. FWI.........this has nothing to do with it being a PPP but rather Campbell wanting to build anything in time for the Olympics and to hell with the actual transit users of the city after that.

Question about the Cherry Streetcar.................Cherry runs N/S and yet the line is less than 1 km. Does that mean someone going downtown is going to have to take a 5 minute streetcar ride only to have to transfer at King or will it become part of the King route?
When are you gonna stop bringing this up all the time? Yes it's brutal that we used Rotem and have small platforms, but everything else you're saying is simply not true. I take the Canada Line (from South Delta) many times a week.

1. The system is NOT over capacity. When school was in session I took the Canada Line every day, there and back during peak hours. I got passed up
only twice this entire school year. During rush hour, it's expected to have the train packed: having it empty means that it was designed with too much capacity. And outside of rush hour, what you're saying is just laughable. 90% of the time you'll get a seat commuting outside of peak hours.

2. The 98 B-Line came every 5-7 minutes during rush hour, and every 10 in the afternoon. So the same as the Canada Line in rush hour, and slower than the Canada Line in the afternoon, since the Canada Line comes every 7 minutes during both periods. Also, right now it takes the Canada Line 25 minutes to go from Richmond-Brighouse to Waterfront, which is the entire line. It took the 98 B-Line 42 minutes to do the same route. I guarantee you you won't find a single person that would rather have the 98 B-Line than the Canada Line.

3. Going into the city from South Delta is MUCH easier ever since the Canada Line opened. How can you say it's slower? Yes you have to transfer at Bridgeport Station, but trains come every 3 minutes there and then you have a 17 minute train ride completely grade separated direct to downtown. Your really think that's slower than having to deal with traffic and lights on Granville Street? You've brought up in other posts that "hordes" of people want to bring the 601 and 351 back to downtown, but you're the only person I've heard say that. It is indisputably true that it's faster with the transfer and Skytrain than a direct bus.

4. So what if you can't get a seat? Are you 90 and can't stand for 17 minutes? It is very rare to be able to get a seat in any metro in the world. If you always have a seat, that means the metro shouldn't have been built in the first place as its ridership is too low. Besides, if you're coming in to Vancouver from South Delta, you can always take the train coming from YVR-Airport, since it is almost always empty and there are many seats. Many people do this in fact, for seats and so they don't have to deal with the packed trains coming in from Richmond-Brighouse.

So while we might have capacity issues in the far future, we are completely fine for now. Current capacity is 6,100 pphpd, which is expandable to 10,100 with 2 minutes headways (4 minutes on the split lines) and to 15,000 pphpd by extending the platforms, which should be fairly easy since it's been pre-built. The only point I'll give you is that they are much slower which is why it was a huge mistake that we went with Rotem. However, I've heard many people say they prefer the Canada Line to the Expo and Millennium Lines because the trains are nicer. I haven't met anybody that's noticed the speed difference, but I definitely agree that it's a big issue.
     
     
  #4238  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 8:17 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Vancouver was stupid to build the Canada Line the way it did. Not only are the stations ridiculously small but can only be expanded to 50 meter which was NOT wwhat we were promised as they were suppose to be 60 meter stations or 3 subway cars.

The standard Metro cars are noticeable slower moving than SkyTrain during the trip, acceleration, and deceleration, everyone notices and comments on it. The system is already over capacity and has solved little. It is faster coming from Richmond but they don't run near as frequently as the BLine buses did to Richmond Centre. It is slower for people coming in from Delta/South Surrey/White Rock due to the transfer and you never get a seat.

This was all Campbell's doing and we are stuck with it. FWI.........this has nothing to do with it being a PPP but rather Campbell wanting to build anything in time for the Olympics and to hell with the actual transit users of the city after that.

Question about the Cherry Streetcar.................Cherry runs N/S and yet the line is less than 1 km. Does that mean someone going downtown is going to have to take a 5 minute streetcar ride only to have to transfer at King or will it become part of the King route?
Do you ever tire of posting complete misinformation?

I can't imagine a single person on this forum doesn't take what you say without a massive grain of salt, let alone utter disbelief.
     
     
  #4239  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 8:33 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
When are you gonna stop bringing this up all the time? Yes it's brutal that we used Rotem and have small platforms, but everything else you're saying is simply not true. I take the Canada Line (from South Delta) many times a week.

1. The system is NOT over capacity. When school was in session I took the Canada Line every day, there and back during peak hours. I got passed up
only twice this entire school year. During rush hour, it's expected to have the train packed: having it empty means that it was designed with too much capacity. And outside of rush hour, what you're saying is just laughable. 90% of the time you'll get a seat commuting outside of peak hours.

2. The 98 B-Line came every 5-7 minutes during rush hour, and every 10 in the afternoon. So the same as the Canada Line in rush hour, and slower than the Canada Line in the afternoon, since the Canada Line comes every 7 minutes during both periods. Also, right now it takes the Canada Line 25 minutes to go from Richmond-Brighouse to Waterfront, which is the entire line. It took the 98 B-Line 42 minutes to do the same route. I guarantee you you won't find a single person that would rather have the 98 B-Line than the Canada Line.

3. Going into the city from South Delta is MUCH easier ever since the Canada Line opened. How can you say it's slower? Yes you have to transfer at Bridgeport Station, but trains come every 3 minutes there and then you have a 17 minute train ride completely grade separated direct to downtown. Your really think that's slower than having to deal with traffic and lights on Granville Street? You've brought up in other posts that "hordes" of people want to bring the 601 and 351 back to downtown, but you're the only person I've heard say that. It is indisputably true that it's faster with the transfer and Skytrain than a direct bus.

4. So what if you can't get a seat? Are you 90 and can't stand for 17 minutes? It is very rare to be able to get a seat in any metro in the world. If you always have a seat, that means the metro shouldn't have been built in the first place as its ridership is too low. Besides, if you're coming in to Vancouver from South Delta, you can always take the train coming from YVR-Airport, since it is almost always empty and there are many seats. Many people do this in fact, for seats and so they don't have to deal with the packed trains coming in from Richmond-Brighouse.

So while we might have capacity issues in the far future, we are completely fine for now. Current capacity is 6,100 pphpd, which is expandable to 10,100 with 2 minutes headways (4 minutes on the split lines) and to 15,000 pphpd by extending the platforms, which should be fairly easy since it's been pre-built. The only point I'll give you is that they are much slower which is why it was a huge mistake that we went with Rotem. However, I've heard many people say they prefer the Canada Line to the Expo and Millennium Lines because the trains are nicer. I haven't met anybody that's noticed the speed difference, but I definitely agree that it's a big issue.
What was the rationale for disallowing Bombardier to consider efficiencies with existing rolling stock in the proposal stage? Presumably Mark III Innovia trains are comparable to the Canada Line's Rotems, just based on age.
     
     
  #4240  
Old Posted May 1, 2014, 8:42 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
What was the rationale for disallowing Bombardier to consider efficiencies with existing rolling stock in the proposal stage? Presumably Mark III Innovia trains are comparable to the Canada Line's Rotems, just based on age.
When the two bids were placed, Translink wanted to make it an equal playing field and take away any advantage Bombardier had with its bid due to integration with the existing system.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.