HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2014, 8:17 PM
M. Incandenza M. Incandenza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas/New York
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermetAJ View Post
Does that really matter if the best of them get wiped out?

The monolithic uninspiring architecture replacing gems all around the city doesn't help either. It doesn't take an architecture enthusiast to recognize beauty vs bland in architecture.
Architects themselves seem to have the most trouble with this concept...

The thing is, the NIMBYs' greatest weapon is the poor quality of so much contemporary architecture. If so many developers weren't putting up "bland glass boxes" - if, though I know it is hard to imagine it, contemporary designs were actually better than many of the buildings they were replacing - then there wouldn't be such a sense of loss when these old buildings went.

Having said that, however, 57th street is kind of a curious example. 432 Park is awful, but I don't think One57 is a bland glass box, and the Steinway building looks fantastic. Much will be determined by how this site and Nordstrom turn out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.