Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidphilly
yes negative and misses some positives
But to me the convention attendance is an issue (even tourist drops though can more influenced by special events i.e. the art museum etc.)
Union and labor costs make the convention center less attractive and thus less hotel rooms etc. May impact all the proposals if believed the market cant bare it
Also - jobs and more of them are needed - plain and simple
|
Center City Philadelphia is certainly not without problems, but if you look at the history of the area and the current trends how could someone actually publish an article with this take away?
Sure Philly still has a bad job market compared to the rest of the country. But it was even worse 5 years ago. Even looking at the job market, how can you be anything but optimistic? After decades of sharp decline, jobs have been growing in Philadelphia for a few years now.
The convention center is an unmitigated disaster, but even then isn't the take away that the convention center is in trouble? Can you really then make the leap that Center City as a whole is in trouble? Despite the fact that basically every other single indicator shows that the outlook for center city is brighter than it's been in a century!
So again, I have no problem with addressing real problems and striving to be better. Center City is a million times better than it was 30 years ago, but being better than 1980s Center City is a low bar to hurdle and nothing to strive for. Nit pick away, point out every negative, I want to strive to compete with the best cities in the world, but put it in perspective!
To put on the front page of philly.com and the inquirer this title: "State of Center City: Signs of Distress" well if it is not a bold faced lie, it is the most unrelentingly negative spin someone could cook up.