Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty van Reddick
This was ever a debate? Hilarious. You're completely wrong- first, because "Quebeckers" can be any ethnicity (as can "Albertan")
|
Technically someone from France could've had their family migrate from Poland 200 years ago and bear a Polish last name, yet they're still French and Latin culturally.
Latin America itself isn't just one homogenous blob of Mestizos, either. Brazil in particular, is extremely multicultural and yet it is still considered apart of Latin America and its people Latin Americans, regardless if they come from Portugal, Germany, Senegal, or the Amazon. I don't see how that's any different from Quebec's multiculturalism.
Quote:
|
and secondly because for definitional, historical, policy-based and EVERY OTHER REASONABLE USE of the term "Latin American," French Canada is excluded.
|
I agree that's why I said 'technically', even though in common vernacular, they're considered two different entities and rightfully so.
Quote:
|
If you're going to argue that it's because French is "Latin," then that criterion is irrelevant since "Latin America" is often operationally defined as everything south of the US and includes English and Dutch speaking countries.
|
Hey, these terms are never perfect!
Quote:
|
I can't believe this was ever an argument. The Canada board is ludicrous.
|
No, some people are just arrogant, that's all.