Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller
|
It's a reoccurring observation of mine that journalists or their editors frequently make numerical errors, especially relating to orders of magnitude. A Globe and Mail reporter did a piece a few weeks back about subsidies to auto manufacturers and he said that the City of Chattanooga offered $577
Billion in subsidies to Volkswagen to secure a $1 billion investment. Nobody in the editorial process caught on to the fact that as-written the subsidy deal would have been probably the most lopsided in history. I did a quick Google search and confirmed that the City gave a $577
million subsidy and tweeted the journalist since I couldn't find their email address anywhere. Billion, million; what difference does it make, right, especially when your whole article is about the perverse size of subsidies?
(Globe and Mail
link; the 'B' is now an 'M' and there's a mention at the bottom of the article about the correction)