HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2014, 3:26 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesCO View Post
That's excellent to hear, though I hope they also double up in the afternoon as well.
Morning commute is more important--it's one thing to get home 10 minutes later than usual, and quite another to be 10 minutes late for work. That said, I also hope they'll double-berth during the evening rush.

Quote:
I also always wondered why they couldn't or haven't done three or even four car trains for the S-Castro Shuttle. I would think that might also help congestion.
Muni runs three-car consists on the S-Shuttle route (between St. Francis Circle and Embarcadero Station) on weekdays, with three round trips from 6:30 a.m. to 10 a.m. and then another three round trips again from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. They're very popular.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2014, 3:35 AM
CharlesCO's Avatar
CharlesCO CharlesCO is offline
Aspiring Amateur
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 415
Oh, well I guess that shows you how much I pay attention. Admittedly, I'm not in the city much during weekdays, and I unfortunately haven't had much time to go in recent weeks/months. Either way, crowded Muni trains aren't a pleasant experience (though I've been on far worse BART trains).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2014, 10:34 PM
OhioGuy OhioGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 7,777
Wharf-extension push surfaces as Central Subway crews dig on

Quote:
As the Central Subway's earth-devouring machines extend the tunnels toward the Chinatown terminus and the North Beach site where they'll be yanked from the ground, a group of transit advocates, neighborhood activists and business interests are pushing for a station in North Beach and an extension to Fisherman's Wharf.

Opponents, of course, are still pressing for the subway to be stopped, or at least for the tunnel-boring machines to be parked in Chinatown and buried in place.

But supporters of an extension, who are operating under the name SF NexTstop (the capital T, cleverly, is for the T line that will run in the subway), say taking the line north to the wharf makes sense.

"Without this last link, the Central Subway can never fully deliver on its promises of connectivity, improved commerce or reductions in surface congestion," the group says in a statement on its website ( www.sfnextstop.org). "We need to complete the Central Subway."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2014, 2:05 AM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 7,758
I hope the NexTstop group can make some real progress. It would be such a missed opportunity if it weren't extended.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2014, 8:33 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,675
Wait, there are folks still trying to derail (pun intended) this thing as its under construction?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2014, 11:05 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
Muni Central Subway wharf extension rides on many things

That group pushing for a Central Subway extension to Fisherman's Wharf - mentioned in Wednesday's column - is making some headway, but it's not quite time to start planning your trip to Scoma's on Muni Metro.

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority, which administers the city's transportation sales tax money, is prepared to dedicate $150,000 to a feasibility study for the extension. The study, according to Tilly Chang, the SFCTA executive director, would move the notion of an extension of the T line past the Chinatown station beyond the idea stage.

"It's intended to flesh it out a little bit," she said - "to look at potential alignments, whether it should be on the surface versus underground, what it might cost."

That preliminary study, Chang said, would then be handed over to the Municipal Transportation Agency for a more in-depth look.

The authority's Plans and Programs Committee will consider funding the study at its meeting Tuesday. If approved, it would go to the full county transportation authority board, which also happens to be the Board of Supervisors.

Chang said the study is "just the beginning of the process to consider and assess the project," which would need to be assigned a place in the MTA's capital spending plans as well as the Bay Area's regional transportation spending strategy.
....

Ah, that new bus smell


The trolley buses on heavily used Muni lines like the 30-Stockton are showing their age, and 60 new ones are on their way and should hit the streets in 2015.

Ah, that new bus smell: Tired of those old, stinky Muni trolley buses that are, in some cases, literally repaired with duct tape? Here's some good news: The Municipal Transportation Agency has placed an order for 60 new electric trolley buses.

Muni will join in on an existing order from the Seattle transit agency to buy 240 regular-length and 93 articulated trolley buses. The purchase price is just short of $95 million, which comes from a mix of federal, state and local money. The local chunk comes from Proposition K, the half-cent transportation sales tax.

A prototype of the new trolley buses should be rolling through the streets in early 2015, MTA officials say.
....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 12:51 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 13,244
Ugh.

The New Flyer trolleybus is debatably as ugly or uglier than the ones they're replacing. I wish one US city could get a sharp trolleybus. Boston isn't too bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 12:52 AM
Perklol's Avatar
Perklol Perklol is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
He said the project is on schedule and on budget.
....
haha yeah right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2014, 3:00 AM
Mishpet1 Mishpet1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 73
Hi guys. I just came through San Fran on the weekend on my way back up to Canada and just wondering if someone could tell me what the construction is by the Golden Gate bridge. I tried doing a search but can't find any info. I appreciate any info you can share.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2014, 4:19 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eveningsong View Post
haha yeah right.
Yeah, I remember. We went to SFO last 12 years ago. We rode on the old electric trolley buses. It was very old. It's time to retired. They have to be replace a brand new buses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2014, 5:40 AM
pizzaguy pizzaguy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishpet1 View Post
Hi guys. I just came through San Fran on the weekend on my way back up to Canada and just wondering if someone could tell me what the construction is by the Golden Gate bridge. I tried doing a search but can't find any info. I appreciate any info you can share.
It's the doomsday device that Obama is going to destroy Canada with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2014, 2:03 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
I crossed the Golden Gate Bridge twice last Thursday and didn't see any construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2014, 10:28 AM
CharlesCO's Avatar
CharlesCO CharlesCO is offline
Aspiring Amateur
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishpet1 View Post
Hi guys. I just came through San Fran on the weekend on my way back up to Canada and just wondering if someone could tell me what the construction is by the Golden Gate bridge. I tried doing a search but can't find any info. I appreciate any info you can share.
Do you mean all the Doyle Drive construction?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2014, 10:44 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
Ah, that must be it. I thought he was talking about buildings going up and couldn't think of any.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2014, 4:13 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
S.F. planners consider 19th Avenue subway




Travel time along the M-Ocean View Muni Metro line averages just 8 to 9 mph along 19th Avenue, where it has to contend with traffic signals and congestion around San Francisco State and Stonestown Galleria. Photo: Michael Short, The Chronicle


To catch a Muni train on 19th Avenue, S.F. State students, Stonestown shoppers and others must cross three lanes of traffic. Photo: Michael Short, The Chronicle

Michael Cabanatuan
Wednesday, April 2, 2014

With the Central Subway well under construction, San Francisco transportation planners are eyeing a possible 19th Avenue subway to speed travel on the sluggish M-Ocean View Muni Metro line.

A recently completed feasibility study recommends building a subway from St. Francis Circle south to San Francisco State University, with stations at Stonestown Galleria and the university. Along the university campus, one track would be below ground and one would be at street level.

The tracks would be extended at ground level through Parkmerced, crossing Junipero Serra Boulevard on a bridge and then traveling at street level to rejoin the existing M line at Randolph Street.
....

Building a subway beneath 19th Avenue could help solve two problems: a painfully slow stretch of light-rail line and a dangerous length of highway that forces San Francisco State students, Stonestown shoppers and other riders to cross three lanes of traffic to catch a train.
....

The M-Ocean View, which carries about 27,000 riders a day, averages just 8 to 9 mph along 19th Avenue, where it has to contend with traffic signals. It travels from downtown to the Balboa Park Muni and BART Station via West Portal, 19th Avenue and the Ocean View neighborhood.

The MTA will continue looking into the subway with a $1 million preliminary environmental study and a Caltrans project report required for work on 19th Avenue, which is part of the state highway system.

Should the agency decide to go ahead with the subway, design and construction would follow - when funding is available. The soonest the project could be completed, the feasibility study says, is 2022.
....

Competition for funding will be stiff, both within the city and the Bay Area, because of the expense and the number of transportation projects seeking funding. But the study says the subway would compete well because of promised investment from the university, which would contribute $1.8 million to help pay for a new station, and Parkmerced developers, as well as its location on a state highway and in an area targeted for high-density development.

Parkmerced station

Development plans for Parkmerced, south of the San Francisco State campus, call for taking the M line tracks off 19th Avenue and into the development with a station inside the neighborhood complex.

The feasibility study also considered keeping the M line all at ground level and building a shorter subway that would emerge before the university and continue at street level with a tunnel beneath 19th Avenue and Junipero Serra Boulevard.

But it concluded the recommended longer subway would reduce travel times along 19th Avenue on the M line by 35 to 45 percent; provide an extra 30 to 50 feet for wider sidewalks, bike paths and bus loading; provide more pedestrian crossings; and create a new bike and pedestrian link between Parkmerced and Ocean View on the light-rail bridge.
....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2014, 7:51 PM
Mishpet1 Mishpet1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesCO View Post
Do you mean all the Doyle Drive construction?
Thanks for the info CharlesCO!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2014, 12:08 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
Not a bad idea, especially considering the — that is the intersection of Sloat blvd./Portola dr./Junipero Serra blvd./West Portal ave./St. Francis blvd. And especially since they recently gave the trains signal priority and adjusted the stop light timing...which is good for the trains, but results in red lights for motorists that can seem like they last for hours.

BUT...

I can't help but think that if we're gonna spend our limited money on building subways, it would be better spent on extending the central subway to north beach/fisherman's wharf, or on the first phase of a Geary street subway or something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2014, 1:24 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by tech12 View Post
..
I can't help but think that if we're gonna spend our limited money on building subways, it would be better spent on extending the central subway to north beach/fisherman's wharf, or on the first phase of a Geary street subway or something.
i tend to agree, even based solely on ridersrhip... but i also have to assume this 19th avenue subway extension is an order of magnitude cheaper than the first phase of a geary street subway. or a van ness subway. extending the central subway to north beach/fisherman's wharf has to be the most cost-effective in terms of time, money, and riders for the near-term.

if i recall, muni's subway was originally planned to extend further - at least to st. francis wood - but was then shortened to save enough money to build embarcadero station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2014, 4:47 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
The Twin Peaks Tunnel opened almost 100 years ago. Embarcadero Station--and the Market Street subway itself--was not yet a glimmer in a planner's eye.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2014, 1:33 AM
OhioGuy OhioGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 7,777
First SMART trains ready for shipping

Quote:
The first train cars ordered up by the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit agency have passed their factory tests in Japan and are ready to be shipped to the United States for on-track testing, SMART general manager Farhad Mansourian said Wednesday.

SMART released the first photos and video of the two grey and green Diesel Multiple Units rolling on tracks outside the Nippon Sharyo factory in Toyokawa, Japan.

The two individually powered cars, which will form one of SMART’s initial seven units, will be shipped by boat and rail within the next few weeks to the Sumitomo Corp. of America plant in Rochelle, Ill., where the rest of the units will be manufactured.

The state-side factory complies with the rail authority’s federal funding requirement to manufacture and assemble the cars in-country.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.