So sometimes at work I play around and I came up with this at one point. It shows the easiest opportunities for new construction (slash the maps of my least favorite things: surface parking lots). Sorry it's a little blurry I didn't want it to be 27 inches wide and screw up formatting so I shrank it down quick and dirty.
So check it out...
orange: parking structure (incl. those on the lower floors of buildings)
light blue: proposed construction on surface parking lots - many I learned about from this thread
dark blue: ongoing construction on surface parking lots
green: SURFACE PARKING LOTS
I'm sure I've missed some and this doesn't show underground because underground parking isn't an easy development opportunity.
I know that everyday we hear about another exciting proposal and I'm super thrilled to hear about new projects all the time. Such an exciting time to be in Philly!! But it's always worth remembering how far we have to go and how much damage we did to ourselves in the past. And you might be tired of hearing from me about how much I hate parking lots but LOOK AT ALL THE PARKING LOTS! Do we really need every proposal to come with a 1:1 parking ratio or a 1:5000 sqft parking ratio?! Comcast has 80 spots in tower 1 and only fills about 50 on any given day. Comcast 2 will have 58 spots. And more households are forming in Philly without cars than with cars.
I was thinking today about 1919 market and the giant garage Brandywine proposed. If they added 10-15 stories of apartments to the building (as rumored) and did away with the garage then we'd really be cooking with gas. Given that 2116 is not fully occupied at $1895 a month (I can see the building from my apartment and at 10 pm it's never more than about 15% lights on) I think that 1919 Market could save $50,000 per spot in construction costs to skip the garage, go with mid-level finishes, and rent at $1300-$1500 a month and fill the building in no time.
Anyway, that's my two cents for the day. Can't wait to hear more from Summers!!