Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH
The reason for my prediction wasn't really tied closely to the current built form. One big driver is going to be energy and transportation costs, and changing norms about commuting. Another is that as a lot of suburbs/exurbs age, they are going to run into the same sorts of depreciation/disinvestment/legacy cost problems as central areas have gone through.
In other words--location, location, location. Things like crime rates, depreciated housing stock, poor municipal services, lack of local retail--all that is fixable, and in fact can be fixed very quickly, at least if there is money to be made. But you can't fix being miles and miles of highway away from the main jobs and amenity clusters.
But everywhere in the arc from Carnegie to McKees Rocks is around as close or closer to Downtown as Squirrel Hill. At some point, that is going to end up being determinative, although precisely when is admittedly anyone's guess.
|
I understand your point, but as you allude in the last paragraph, it will probably be a long time before demand is high enough in Pittsburgh to ensure that all neighborhoods close to Downtown are desirable. considering there's still plenty of prime areas to go around.
It also doesn't deal with the issue that Oakland alone has around 1/3rd of the jobs Downtown does, as well as of course housing two major universities and most of the premier city amenities. Hell, Oakland was originally built up to replace Downtown Pittsburgh in the early 20th century. Thus Pittsburgh has been "eastward facing" for quite some time - something I don't see changing much in the near future.
I really wish this forum had a place for general city discussion, even if just on one thread, because discussing the fates of various neighborhoods is important to development, but a bit off-topic in this particular thread.