HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations



Related Pages:  • Chicago Projects & Construction Forum  • Chicago Highrise Developments Map


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #13301  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 6:43 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
Yeah, if this is going to be the crown jewel of LSE and a showcase of Gang design and Magellan money, I'd think they'd want to stick it here:



You cant legally build something closer to the lake, plus it'd be on the river too and would probably have a good vantage to Navy Pier.

EDIT:

CAB has a good rundown here: http://blog.chicagoarchitecture.info/201...rabbit-out-of-her-hat-at-lakeshore-east/

Along with a handy map I havent seen in a while.
Here's more from the CAB article:

Quote:
It comes as no surprise that Carlins tells Crain’s that he’s thinking of two possible locations for the new tower. One is obviously next door to Aqua at 205 North Columbus Drive, the so-called “Site O.” The gaping hole is currently zoned for an 80+ story tower, and is across the street from the Fairmont Hotel (200 North Columbus Drive)...

The other potential location, as we see it, is on East Wacker Drive. ”Site C” is adjacent to phase 2 of the GEMS Academy school project...

Sites I, J, K, and L are expected to be purely residential. A hotel makes more sense at Sites C/D because its closer to Michigan Avenue and the rest of Chicago’s tourist attractions.
__________________
flickr
     
     
  #13302  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 6:56 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,012
My only problem with site O is that anything there would feel unceremoniously tucked between two massive rectangles and not receive much visual exposure, plus it might block southern views of Aqua. I'm sure something will go there eventually, but you wont be able to see it from the river unless it was packed tightly to the east side of the lot, in which case you couldn't see it from Randolph or the park because BCBS would block it. A project like this, you'd think they'd want to make sure people could see it.
     
     
  #13303  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 6:57 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 13,026
And the beasts mark has to do with mordor how exactly?
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
     
     
  #13304  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 7:18 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,347
Well, lets hope for site C then. Looks like the site we were thinking has 4 buildings and a park scheduled for it. Hopefully 1 or both of the ones along LSD are cool designs.
     
     
  #13305  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 7:32 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Yeah, I hope it is site C. A lot of people don't realize that a large building at that site will be highly visible not only from the river corridor, but will also visually terminate Columbus drive from the south. Can't wait to see what Gang is cooking up.

I hope it is not site O because I want to avoid a Studio Gang circlejerk with all of her biggest buildings right next to each other. Site C is sufficiently distant from Aqua that it will not take away from her existing work.
     
     
  #13306  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 7:38 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Yeah, I hope it is site C. A lot of people don't realize that a large building at that site will be highly visible not only from the river corridor, but will also visually terminate Columbus drive from the south.
no, columbus and site C do not align with each other. columbus is west of BCBS/Aqua/the rest of LSE.

site C roughly aligns with the N/S portion of LSD that goes through grant park.

in fact, site C is the approximate location of where the western half of the old notorious LSD S-curve was located.


source: http://forgottenchicago.com/pics/LSD/cushscurve.jpg
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 4, 2014 at 8:01 PM.
     
     
  #13307  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 8:00 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Sorry that's what I meant, terminate LSD (which is much more awesome since alot more people drive on LSD than Columbus) in much the same way that Field Museum does. I was just thinking Columbus due to all the talk about Site O and Aqua.

Last edited by LouisVanDerWright; Mar 4, 2014 at 8:11 PM.
     
     
  #13308  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 8:03 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Site C offers the greatest visual impact, not to mention permanent, unobstructed views to the north.
__________________
flickr
     
     
  #13309  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 10:57 PM
chicagogreg chicagogreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 55
What already seems like a fairly dense LSE neighborhood is only about half full. There's about 5,000 residents today and plans for the future include 5,000 more. Add in another Gang project and its not too shabby...Very excited
     
     
  #13310  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2014, 11:37 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
212 W Illinois - Feb 28





__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #13311  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 12:56 AM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
One day soon (skewed a bit), Thanks Harry!
     
     
  #13312  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 1:11 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
765 W Adams - Feb 28

As seen from Lake st
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #13313  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 1:53 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,377
Some foreshadowing for a potential tower.
====================================
Jeanne Gang Tapped By Aqua Developer For Another Project



Quote:
Rockstar architect and hometown heavyweight Jeanne Gang has been recommissioned by the Aqua developer for a new project. The tower will be the latest entry to Magellan's 28 acre Lakeshore East development, which has currently has nine sites available according to Crain's. The announcement of the new project comes just weeks after the developer sold the last remaining unit in the award winning Aqua (good timing). Noting their mutually beneficial relationship, Magellan hopes that Gang's magic will produce another landmark building that will have future residents climbing over one another for a space in the new tower. Details on whether the project will consist of condos or rental apartments is unknown, although initial plans do include a hotel. More concrete plans are expected to be revealed in six months.
======================================
AJ LaTrace
http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2014/...y-aqua-developer-for-another-project.php
     
     
  #13314  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 2:20 AM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,012
^We talked about that all day.
     
     
  #13315  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 1:45 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Looks like the new owner of Atrium Village is gearing up to move forward on the project
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4WNEwTDZlUKB1w8ED5bV2Q

People who say housing is a human right deserve to be homeless
     
     
  #13316  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 2:09 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,150
Atrium Village news

After buying Old Town apartments, Canadian investor could build many more

Quote:
Canadian real estate firm Onni Group of Cos. continues to stockpile downtown development sites, agreeing to buy an Old Town property where it could build 1,500 new housing units, five times the number currently there.

A venture that includes Vancouver, B.C.-based Onni has agreed to pay about $53 million for the Atrium Village apartment complex, according to people familiar with the deal. Onni is buying the property at the southwest corner of Division and Wells streets from a group including Seattle-based Security Properties Inc.
...
Crains
     
     
  #13317  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 2:31 PM
pilsenarch pilsenarch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 895
Gang: I've seen the design, it is on sites C & D. Terminated LSD axis, and the design would not work on any other site... don't know what that guy was talking about. Maybe another design altogether.
     
     
  #13318  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 2:35 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilsenarch View Post
Gang: I've seen the design, it is on sites C & D. Terminated LSD axis, and the design would not work on any other site... don't know what that guy was talking about. Maybe another design altogether.
WAIT, WHAT? YOU'VE SEEN THE DESIGN?

MORE PLEASE!

does it follow Aqua, or is it going in a new direction? does it borrow the keyhole element from the old Arquitectonica design? at least give me a "it looks promising", or something along those lines.

something. anything. please!
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 5, 2014 at 2:54 PM.
     
     
  #13319  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 3:12 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilsenarch View Post
Gang: I've seen the design, it is on sites C & D. Terminated LSD axis, and the design would not work on any other site...
Pilsen I find your spy skills lacking!! You couldn't sneak in a cell phone pic?!
     
     
  #13320  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2014, 3:52 PM
guesswho guesswho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
What are the guesses for the hotel portion of the project at this point?
Wasn't there a mention when site O was believed to be the next location for a tower, of some new hotel brand (that I've never heard of at least)? Did the hotel name start with an "A"?

Not much in terms of globally branded large hotels that aren't already in Chicago.
1- St. Regis
2- Grand Hyatt
3- Edition (Marriott, yes, still around)
4- Raffles (part of Fairmont, but they really only target Asia)
5- Le Meridien (after exiting Chicago when sold to become Conrad)
6- Mandarin Oriental (if still interested in Chicago after their project on Stetson busted)
7- Shangri-La (if still interested in Chicago after Waterview busted)

Or of course it could also be (if a high end ultra luxury hotel isn't the plan)
1- another large standard hotel like a Marriott/Hilton etc., or an expansion of the current Fairmont as the CAB points out
2- some independent or foreign brand that isn't present/has a larget presence yet in the US (i.e. like AC hotels by Marriott over in River North)
3- doubtful, but a standard chain like Residence Inn, Hilton Garden Inn, Hyatt Place, or a combo like the Tri-Hotels

Thoughts? I'd imagine the hotel would occupy the lower floors......

Last edited by guesswho; Mar 5, 2014 at 4:06 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.