HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 12:09 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,833
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
The Austin Business Journal has an article on it now, too: http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/news/2...court-downtown-stadium-major-league.html
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 3:25 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,980
It's exciting, but I'm really against the name "Aztex". Is that really the best we can come up with? They should hold a contest and take submissions. Let the team be an authentic Austin creation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 3:58 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,980
Wow. Hostile much? I just think it's a corny name. Especially with the "-tex" spelling. It doesn't look/sound like a professional team. It sounds like a minor league team.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 4:05 AM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by migol24 View Post
nobody cares about your disdain towards mexican heritage 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵.
"Aztex" isn't even a real word. Arizona and Texas probably made it up... I believe you are referring to Aztec.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 4:58 AM
migol24 migol24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by IluvATX View Post
"Aztex" isn't even a real word. Arizona and Texas probably made it up... I believe you are referring to Aztec.
syndic has expressed certain things about mexico before and how he/she finds it "offensive" for austin to even have a museum dedicated to hispanics on Congress. so the last statement is considerably suspect.

from my gathering, syndic is libertarian... i've found libertarians often times say things off the wall where they retract a bit and have to reexplain themselves. republicans just say it... they don't care.

so while, i would have agreed that "aztex" sounds cheesy for a soccer team... it doesn't change how syndic feels about mexico. especially when using a term like "really against the name." I've never been against a name. I've disliked names sure, but never been against. how could you be against a name unless you have some sort of ideology? i've been against an ideology but never against a name, unless it was an offensive name.

Last edited by migol24; Feb 28, 2014 at 5:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 7:14 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
Aztex is a confusing name for a team in Austin. How many Aztecs were ever here? What kind of tie do they have with Austin?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 8:26 AM
Digatisdi's Avatar
Digatisdi Digatisdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Downtown Austin
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
Aztex is a confusing name for a team in Austin. How many Aztecs were ever here? What kind of tie do they have with Austin?
Absolutely none

Mind you I'm Cherokee-- not "'my great grandmother was a Cherokee Princess' Cherokee", but you know, actually Cherokee. I even speak the language.

The Aztec empire was (and current Aztec population is) focused in south-central Mexico. The indigenous group whose land Austin is on are the Comanche, with the Tonkawa a bit Southeast, Waco Tribe to the north and the Lipan to the Southwest.

The name "Aztex" makes no sense to me or anybody else.

As a bit of a sidenote, I tend to be against all "Native American Mascots" but that's another discussion for another time and another place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 8:31 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
My great grandmothers through my dad's mom's side were both natives. Cherokee and Comanche. I'm whiter than white, so I don't try and claim I'm Native American. haha

My questions were rhetorical, though. I think the Aztex name is pretty ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 8:35 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,846
Ya'll... Aztecs makes complete sense because it is a play on words.

Most teams have absolutely nothing to do with place, but rather about economics. This one, actually, has a lot to do with place because of the play on words:

Austin, Texas ...
Aus., Tex. ...
AzTex ...

It just so happens that it lends itself to being a pretty cool team name as well. So who cares? I'm fine with it. It's cool and multi-cultural. Austin is a liberal city, despite what some here would prefer, and that liberalism is inherently intertwined with multi-cultural trends.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 3:30 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,980
It's unfortunate because I want to support the team (I like soccer a lot) but I just feel stupid doing so since it's such a ridiculously bad name. Somewhere along the line, someone high up will impress upon the owners that it's not good enough for MLS, though. I get the logic behind the name. I just think it's silly and corny.

Also, I'm not a libertarian. I dunno how you could come to that conclusion from reading my comments. Everyone here knows I'm a socialist. But give it a rest, migol24. Stop being mad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 4:04 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syndic View Post
It's unfortunate because I want to support the team (I like soccer a lot) but I just feel stupid doing so since it's such a ridiculously bad name. Somewhere along the line, someone high up will impress upon the owners that it's not good enough for MLS, though. I get the logic behind the name. I just think it's silly and corny.
Unlike:

Chivas USA (no where near Guadalajara, in fact I think we may be closer)
Real Salt Lake (not in Spain and not awarded a royal title by the King of Spain)
or (ugh) Sporting Kansas City

face it, names in MLS 🞵🞵🞵🞵. Aztex would be far from the worst.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 4:08 PM
migol24 migol24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Unlike:

Chivas USA (no where near Guadalajara, in fact I think we may be closer)
Real Salt Lake (not in Spain and not awarded a royal title by the King of Spain)
or (ugh) Sporting Kansas City

face it, names in MLS 🞵🞵🞵🞵. Aztex would be far from the worst.
Even Austin Ice Bats was a terrible name.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 4:43 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Unlike:

Chivas USA (no where near Guadalajara, in fact I think we may be closer)
Real Salt Lake (not in Spain and not awarded a royal title by the King of Spain)
or (ugh) Sporting Kansas City

face it, names in MLS 🞵🞵🞵🞵. Aztex would be far from the worst.
Chivas USA has been purchased by MLS. They will be sold and undergo a rebranding in the next year. Their attendance was 🞵🞵🞵🞵 partly because their brand was 🞵🞵🞵🞵. Just like ours.

I like Sporting Kansas City. Real Salt Lake is bad but they were part of the first few teams in MLS so names have gotten better since then.

Last edited by Syndic; Feb 28, 2014 at 4:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 5:50 PM
austin242 austin242 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 591
True Lame Names
LA Galaxy- In a galaxy not so far away where we use glaxys to call people
Houston OILERS - Oh we work in oil, we like oil, that's what Texans are proud to represnt
DALLAS COWBOYS- Personally thought it was cheesy for no reason except that it's Texas.
NY GIANTS - O I guess they are really big. Just cheese.
NY RED BULLS- Sell outs
Portland Timbers- Someones got wood
LA Lakers- It somewhat did make sense in Minneapolis but not LA.
Miami Fusion - Is that a knock off sports drink or something
Austin High Maroons- Because we are just a color

I personally love the Ice Bats. It kinda represented Austin. Its at least better than The Austin Ice Salamanders. I like Austin Armadillos though. I like the Aztex I went to school with people from Aztec descent so to say it doesn't belong in Austin would be incorrect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 7:26 PM
ski-man ski-man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 109
Austin High secretly roots for Texas A&M :-)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 8:10 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,833
I've always sort of thought that sports mascots all had dumb names, and few of them ever reflect the area they "represent". I'd say of any sport local high school mascots tend to make the most sense because most of their mascots can actually be found in the area, or at least were in the area at one time. For example, I went to Bedichek. Their mascot is the bobcat, and you can still find bobcats in Central Texas. I saw on the news this week there was a pit bull that was attacked by a bobcat up in Round Rock. The dog's owner ran out with an ax and beat the bobcat off his dog. And supposedly there have been mountain lions (cougars) spotted in Southwest Austin before.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 9:44 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,442
Geez...What is really ridiculous is that y'all are arguing about a name! Who cares about the name (at this time)...rather, we should be asking: how is someone (or who) going to come up with enough capital to field a team? Where is the stadium going to be built (i.e, Houston's urban BBVA Stadium covers about 12 acres)? And, who is going to pony-up the $100MM to build said stadium?

As much as I love soccer, I don't see Austin getting a "downtown" stadium any time soon. A franchise...maybe. But, that stadium will more than likely be built out on the fringes of town (where there is more land, the land is cheaper, and the cities/neighborhoods are friendlier to this type of development).
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 1,002,632 +4.64% - '20-'25 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,620,945 +14.78% - '20-'25
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,548,422 +8.03% - '20-'25 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,813,140 +9.97% - '20-'25
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,434,085 +12.24% - '20-'25 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 11:54 PM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Williamson County
Posts: 4,498
I think the Austin American Statesman should be relocated to the outskirts of town and an arena or stadium should be put in its place.
The MLS team name could be the Austin Weirdos...in keeping with the "Keep Austin Weird" slogan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2014, 1:33 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digatisdi View Post
Absolutely none

Mind you I'm Cherokee-- not "'my great grandmother was a Cherokee Princess' Cherokee", but you know, actually Cherokee. I even speak the language.

The Aztec empire was (and current Aztec population is) focused in south-central Mexico. The indigenous group whose land Austin is on are the Comanche, with the Tonkawa a bit Southeast, Waco Tribe to the north and the Lipan to the Southwest.

The name "Aztex" makes no sense to me or anybody else.

As a bit of a sidenote, I tend to be against all "Native American Mascots" but that's another discussion for another time and another place.
Not to press this subject but saying there are no Aztec's in Austin is not true. Many Hispanics that live here are of Aztec ancestry. My best friend and her dads family are as true Azteca as you can get. Her father moved here from Mexico City back in the 70s as well as many others from Central Mexico.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2014, 1:50 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,860
Double posted
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)

Last edited by Jdawgboy; Mar 1, 2014 at 2:01 AM. Reason: double post
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.