HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1481  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 9:42 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plokoon11 View Post
There building too much in the city, we need to start knocking down a few skyscrapers to even it out.
I would punch a baby.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1482  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 9:47 PM
miesian's Avatar
miesian miesian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
I would punch a baby.
:babyeat:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1483  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 9:48 PM
mPhilly mPhilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 119
Construction fence up on 15th and Walnut. Isn't this where the Cheesecake Factory was going to be or did I miss something?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1484  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2014, 11:45 PM
Larry King Larry King is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by mPhilly View Post
Construction fence up on 15th and Walnut. Isn't this where the Cheesecake Factory was going to be or did I miss something?
Yep they're knocking it down
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1485  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 1:19 AM
Outta here's Avatar
Outta here Outta here is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 1060 W. Addison
Posts: 400
What a view it will provide .....

The , yet to be named restaurant atop the CITC has forced me to ask this question . Will it be a closed door lobby , or an open contest for employees
and some , not so selected future guest of the hotel and eatery . I'm going to go
out on a limb and make my selection .... the " Innovation " . Hope I don't get
banned from here for having a blood alcohol level of 2.8 .

__________________


.....Words that are heavy with trouble :
" Tinker to Evers to Chance ."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1486  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 1:35 AM
PhiLaw PhiLaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outta here View Post
The , yet to be named restaurant atop the CITC has forced me to ask this question . Will it be a closed door lobby , or an open contest for employees
and some , not so selected future guest of the hotel and eatery . I'm going to go
out on a limb and make my selection .... the " Innovation " . Hope I don't get
banned from here for having a blood alcohol level of 2.8 .

Not sure what you mean here. Union? Keeping out riff-raff?
__________________
"Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1487  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 1:49 AM
Philly2Queens Philly2Queens is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILovePhilly View Post
We've discussed this before but I don't that that whatever is going on inside the building justifies poor street treatment. If you look through the designs you may find, as I found, that the treatment of the cycling and pedestrian environment is BAD.

They are proposing a driveway cut on South Street on the bridge where cyclists are already coming downhill with a 100 second light cycle. The cut is going to put right turning drivers right through the bike lane (on which bikers will have some speed going downhill). It's a deadly arrangement. And it will also jam up pedestrians. Having a light at 27th Street and about 150 feet west of there for the driveway cut will have a negative impact on traffic and on cyclists and pedestrians. (Me, personally, I don't care about negative impacts on traffic because I don't see what's so sacred about existing conditions). BUT the whole South Street bridge is considered part of the traffic flow for the on-off ramps for the Schuylkill Expressway so PennDOT and the Federal Government have to approve changes to traffic patterns. All of this is to say... if they did away with the curb cut on South Street I think they'd be in better position. The 40 is wildly inadequate. SEPTA and the City can't thrive on buses like the 40. I hate the 40. But rather than this curb cut Penn could run a 30th Street shuttle for workers to cut down on the need for driving/parking, for example.

The application also says that the plaza will allow bike/ped access to the trail after it's built south of South St. This is great! But I didn't see anywhere on the application that a bike could access the plaza (it was all steps) and the access is listed as "future". I'm not sure that access is critical as the South street bridge will have ramps up and running this spring but people may not want to deal with the 100 second light cycle to walk out the north side of the building or (worse) the north side access may be automobile only. They also aren't providing bike parking (specifically says no bike parking) which is just a textbook example of lacking sensitivity to their own needs. The new Comcast tower will have 175 bike parking spots and they had to keep adding spots at the current building to meet demand. It's just not forward thinking to make the whole thing automobile oriented. I think that was the basis of the suburbanesque complaint.

Also, as much as I love their little promenade overhanging the CSX tracks I can tell you that will never happen in ten million years. There will be air rights issues and CSX will be very protective now that they use those lines much more frequently for their oil train shipments.

Honestly aside from the South Street curb cut and the lack of bike sensitivity I like this proposal. They could put the curb cut for the garage off of Schuylkill Avenue or 27th Street and be in better shape.

I don't just like economic development and tall buildings; I like context and urbanity. It's possible to be critical of elements of this proposal without being some sort of impossible-to-please. This proposal could be better but that doesn't mean that overall it's a bad prospect.
Well said. The reason site design is so important is because the pedestrian friendliness and intimate feeling of Center City are what truly set Philadelphia apart from the pack of American cities in terms of urban quality IMO. As much as we all love tall buildings and want Philly to have lots, lots more of them, and regain and bolster its position as a leading world city, the city needs to realize its uniqueness and play it up. With the burgeoning population of Center City, the primary focus on getting people to and from work should be public transit, walking, and biking.

This site design belongs in Houston. Or Dallas. Or Raleigh-Durham, because it is so auto-centric. Ugly, soul-less suburb-cities all of them (my apologies to anyone from those places). A great example of the urbanity we should strive for is the new apartment development at 1213 Walnut, or of course the new Comcast building. No parking garages or surface parking, limited or non existent curb cuts.

Hopefully Chop can do a little better in the future!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1488  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 2:26 AM
josef's Avatar
josef josef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Collingswood
Posts: 876
Remember Marina View?

Quote:
Delaware River property sold for $5.5M

Developer Lou Cicalese revised his plans on his Marina View project along the Delaware River in Philadelphia and has now sold it.

The site at 230 N. Christopher Columbus Blvd. traded for a roughly $5.5 million, according to Philadelphia property records. An entity affiliated with PMC Property Group of Philadelphia bought it.

When Cicalese first set his sights on 230 N. Christopher Columbus in 2005, his Delaware River Development Group planned a three-building, $450 million project. It would have been constructed in three phases in three towers with a total of 600 condominiums. The idea was to create a new cluster of communities along the strip facing the river.

The developer was set to break ground in October 2005 but never went forward.

Cicalese, who couldn’t immediately be reached for comment, revised the project in 2012. It shaped up to be a 14-story apartment building with 180 rental units as well as some retail space. It couldn’t be determined what PMC Property Group plans do with the site.
http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/...ld-for-55m.html?ana=RSS&s=article_search
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1489  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 3:29 AM
Insoluble Insoluble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhiLaw View Post
Remember that this is a hospital complex - albeit research-oriented. How many hospitals can you name that have no set-back from the street?
1) This is going to primarily be research and administrative offices and won't have the same needs (i.e. easy access for emergency vehicles) that a typical hospital building would.

2) Jefferson and Pensylvania Hospital do a great job of maintaining the urban fabric. Hahnemann does okay (their main problem is the proliferation of surface lots, not the site layout). Heck even Temple Health at least has buildings that meet the street wall without having excessive driveways etc. I see no reason that this site can't replicate what has already been done.

I know the area is not currently all that well connected to the city. That doesn't mean we shouldn't want better. Again, I'm not complaining. I'm just saying that this admittedly lovely building could do a much better job of integrating into the urban fabric and I hope they end up making some changes.

Regarding Fergie Tower: That is awesome news! I've been hoping this one would make a comeback! It seems like we're getting at least one major development per week. I can hardly keep track anymore!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1490  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 4:01 AM
philatonian's Avatar
philatonian philatonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mappy View Post
look at this craziness !!!

What's the highrise by the South Street Bridge?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1491  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 4:06 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by philatonian View Post
What's the highrise by the South Street Bridge?
700 Schuylkill Ave. 23 floors- 375 feet. Set to break ground this summer. Just Phase 1 of what will eventually be a 4 tower complex. An entire office/medical research facility for the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.



















http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projec...%202014_700%20Schuylkill%20Avenue_v2.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1492  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 7:50 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,458
Incredible!

I knew about that project but had never seen any renderings for some reason. I've said it before and I'll say it again, Philly's skyline is really expanding in every direction. It's finally developing a skyline worthy of its size and economic impact.
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1493  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 2:13 PM
Baconboy007 Baconboy007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 462
Inga

http://www.philly.com/philly/home/201402...indedness__architectural_hodgepodge.html

She really poopoo'ed this one but I really like the look of it and think it fits in well with the rest of the architecture in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1494  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 2:39 PM
Nightman Nightman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef View Post

This may be a good sign Cicalese never builds anything they just flip undeveloped parcels. Correct me if I am wrong but hasnt PMC done a bunch of apartments recently in center city west?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1495  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 2:40 PM
MusicMan84 MusicMan84 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 284
Well... She's disappointed it isn't forward-thinking architecture, but she does suggest that at least they will execute the look with quality materials. I happen to like the tower... It's good to have a variety of looks, and I have faith we will be seeing plenty of glassy modern looks...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1496  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 2:45 PM
josef's Avatar
josef josef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Collingswood
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by MusicMan84 View Post
Well... She's disappointed it isn't forward-thinking architecture, but she does suggest that at least they will execute the look with quality materials. I happen to like the tower... It's good to have a variety of looks, and I have faith we will be seeing plenty of glassy modern looks...
Right, wasn't someone just the other day asking if the era of non-all-glass towers is over? Surely she likes this better than the Prefabulous Pepto Bismol House on Broad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1497  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 3:18 PM
Flyers2001 Flyers2001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baconboy007 View Post
http://www.philly.com/philly/home/201402...indedness__architectural_hodgepodge.html

She really poopoo'ed this one but I really like the look of it and think it fits in well with the rest of the architecture in the area.
I think her article was very good. I don't necessarily agree with her view points about the look of the building, but she does a very nice job of giving credit with what is being accomplished by the Mormons and how they have been successful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1498  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 3:47 PM
PhiLaw PhiLaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyers2001 View Post
I think her article was very good. I don't necessarily agree with her view points about the look of the building, but she does a very nice job of giving credit with what is being accomplished by the Mormons and how they have been successful.
Inga's one of those columnists I love to hate. She seems to ignore financial reality and other constraints on builders, and yearns for some gilded age of modern architecture. However, she knows a hell of a lot more than i do about architecture. Couple that with her excellent prose writing skills and I just have to read her stuff. My biggest gripe with her is that she doesn't zoom out and get the whole perspective.
__________________
"Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1499  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 4:16 PM
relnahe's Avatar
relnahe relnahe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baconboy007 View Post
http://www.philly.com/philly/home/201402...indedness__architectural_hodgepodge.html

She really poopoo'ed this one but I really like the look of it and think it fits in well with the rest of the architecture in the area.
I'm sorry but I have ZERO clue how anyone could value Inga's architectural critiques. Yes this building has a 1920s-style apartment tower look but there are no elements of any sort of federal or georgian style to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1500  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 4:43 PM
PhiLaw PhiLaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by relnahe View Post
I'm sorry but I have ZERO clue how anyone could value Inga's architectural critiques. Yes this building has a 1920s-style apartment tower look but there are no elements of any sort of federal or georgian style to it.
You're speaking in platitudes. Inga knows a lot about architecture. The conclusions she draws, however, are misguided. But you can't discount her knowledge and ability to turn a word.
__________________
"Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put."
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:10 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.