HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2521  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2014, 11:22 PM
franktko's Avatar
franktko franktko is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tone View Post
Picture taken this afternoon - we had 55cm friday and 30cm yesterday, imagine that!
Why the hell are most roof snow-free after 85 cm of snow?? There is no isolation in that part of the province??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2522  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2014, 11:27 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by franktko View Post
Why the hell are most roof snow-free after 85 cm of snow?? There is no isolation in that part of the province??
Or everyone has grow-ops in their attics...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2523  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2014, 11:36 PM
Tone's Avatar
Tone Tone is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by franktko View Post
Why the hell are most roof snow-free after 85 cm of snow?? There is no isolation in that part of the province??
Waterfront properties like the ones in the bottom of the picture can be exposed to high winds from the St. Lawrence. They reached between 70 and 100km/h during those two storms, so not much snow have a chance to stay on those roofs! The snow banks are another story.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2524  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 2:17 AM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
I like the density of Regina's downtown core. I'd love to walk around it someday, get a sense of how it feels from the streets.
It is quite dense - and will be even more dense in about two years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2525  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 3:53 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 22,842
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2526  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 4:10 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,800
Kelowna always looks like a resort or something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2527  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 4:22 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,007
It's the kind of place that makes for lovely post cards but the city has a lot to be desired.

It's downtown is small and uninteresting, the suburbs stretch out aimlessly, and the main street is just one very long strip mall. The place has no flavour, is devoid of culture, and is a red-neck haven. Kelowna is a VERY conservative and religious city.

There are a lot of nice places in BC to both live in and visit but Kelowna isn't one of them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2528  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 5:05 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,376
^ I've gotta say, I actually really enjoy your blunt appraisals at times. As long as they're directed at someone else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2529  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 5:41 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Halifax pano:


Source
What's that tower under construction in the middle of the photo? Looks tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2530  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 6:05 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,376
Doubling the size (width) of the TD building on Barrington but I don't think it will increase the height much. Adds office density downtown though which is important as the vacancy rate is pretty low.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2531  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 12:25 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
That's doubling the size? All this time I thought it was just a re-clad!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2532  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 12:52 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Edit.

Last edited by RyeJay; Feb 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2533  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 2:49 PM
Nashe's Avatar
Nashe Nashe is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
It's the kind of place that makes for lovely post cards but the city has a lot to be desired.

It's downtown is small and uninteresting, the suburbs stretch out aimlessly, and the main street is just one very long strip mall. The place has no flavour, is devoid of culture, and is a red-neck haven. Kelowna is a VERY conservative and religious city.

There are a lot of nice places in BC to both live in and visit but Kelowna isn't one of them.
LOL, you should write a travel book.

"If you're looking to hang a hammock somewhere on Newfoundland, give up on it. You won't find a tree tall enough, and a moose will eat all of your chips. The mosquitoes are large enough that their caustic droppings may cause significant damage to the paint of cars parked near bodies of standing water."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2534  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 2:53 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkuta View Post
LOL, you should write a travel book.

"If you're looking to hang a hammock somewhere on Newfoundland, give up on it. You won't find a tree tall enough, and a moose will eat all of your chips. The mosquitoes are large enough that their caustic droppings may cause significant damage to the paint of cars parked near bodies of standing water."
You have to go inland for mosquitoes. There are basically none along the coast where people actually live.

Here's a more accurate Newfoundland hammock review:

"If you're looking to hang a hammock somewhere on the Avalon Peninsula, don't bother. The tuckamore rarely exceed chest height and the wind will make any use of a hammock a potentially life-threatening enterprise."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2535  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 2:55 PM
Nashe's Avatar
Nashe Nashe is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
"If you're looking to hang a hammock somewhere on the Avalon Peninsula, don't bother. The tuckamore rarely exceed chest height and the wind will make any use of a hammock a potentially life-threatening enterprise."
Rebrand it as "parasailing" and you're good to go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2536  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 2:58 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkuta View Post
Rebrand it as "parasailing" and you're good to go.
Oh my God. That was a thing of beauty right there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2537  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 4:27 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 36,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
Doubling the size (width) of the TD building on Barrington but I don't think it will increase the height much.
According to the thread it's going from 18 floors to 23 floors and from 73 m to 83 m.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2538  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2014, 4:50 PM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
According to the thread it's going from 18 floors to 23 floors and from 73 m to 83 m.
That's great to hear. It's one way to heighten the skyline that is rarely ever done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2539  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2014, 6:11 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 36,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
That's great to hear. It's one way to heighten the skyline that is rarely ever done.
Here's a hastily-made rendering with the new TD tower and a couple of other projects under construction:



TD is a bit shorter than 1801 Hollis but it is about 10 m higher up in elevation. The Nova Centre similarly is only 65 m but its site has an average elevation about 30 m above sea level, so it will look more like a 90-100 m building.

The gaps in taller buildings between TD and the Nova Centre in the middle and then to the left of the Bank of Canada redevelopment (extending left out of the frame toward the Maritime Centre) exist because of height limits that protect views from Citadel Hill.

(Now that I think about it, I used the opposite elevation for the BoC building so it should have been flipped horizontally.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2540  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2014, 6:31 AM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Here's a hastily-made rendering with the new TD tower and a couple of other projects under construction.

The gaps in taller buildings between TD and the Nova Centre in the middle and then to the left of the Bank of Canada redevelopment (extending left out of the frame toward the Maritime Centre) exist because of height limits that protect views from Citadel Hill.
Once again, someone123, your contributions are appreciated.
The "gap" in height that will remain for Halifax's skyline, from this view anyway, between the bank towers and the Nova Centre due to Citadel viewplanes actually accentuates the Citadel Hill rather nicely...

It looks really good.

And the Nova Centre itself, looks good, which is why it's kind of a shame (although not really) that the Roy Building (not shown in this rendering) will conceal half the Nova Centre from view once it's built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.