Quote:
Originally Posted by counterfactual
On the other side of Barrington, there is so much wasted space. That Tim Hortons looks like it should be out in the suburbs somewhere, not in an area that ought to be more densely developed.
Why the shabbiness? Is it just cheap owners/landlords, wanting to avoid rising taxes via increased property assessments?
|
Tim Horton's was built to the standard at the time. After Southport gets built it will see more pressure put on the company to sell the land. This particular Tim's services the South Downtown area which given the high usage of "active" commuting could probably do fine with a large walk-in only shop. Tim's recently opened a beautiful new location in the Bow Tower (Calgary) on the Plus 15 network so I know when prompted they are capable of building great locations. Hopefully a similar one will be built to replace this and/or the Spring Garden location.
As for the shabbiness it mostly has to do with investment. Most of the buildings in the South and North Ends are owned by investment companies that buy up properties, get the rent money until the leases are over, buy up a few neighbours over time, demolish the buildings, then sell them to developers as a package. Some investors will go as far as getting a development agreement before selling the land.
The good news about drive-thrus is the Centre Plan will presumably limit their locations on the Peninsula. Gas stations have been shuttering around the Peninsula for a while now and after land clean-up they can become nice redevelopments spots (ie Bayers & Oxford).