HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8561  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:20 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung


Not to be a dick, but....
I like how you include other areas in Vancouver and it's suburbs but leave the Calgary map just as downtown, way to keep it apples to apples. BTW this isn't about how many highrises are in a city, it's about how many are downtown and what the boundaries of the downtown urban area (with highrises obviously) are.

Everyone knows the GVR is bigger than Metro Calgary, so what's the point?
My point was to be a dick... and to point out the arbitrariness of skyline "boundaries". I KNEW someone would complain about my deceitful omission of a dozen or so towers scattered around Calgary, but ain't nobody got time for that!
     
     
  #8562  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:22 AM
ZeDgE ZeDgE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,208
'LORD JEZUS THARS A FIRE!'

I'm in a goofy mood and this bickering is lame.

:nofun:
     
     
  #8563  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:22 AM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
My point was to be a dick... and to point out the arbitrariness of skyline "boundaries". I KNEW someone would complain about my deceitful omission of a dozen or so towers scattered around Calgary, but ain't nobody got time for that!
So you admit to trolling then? good job!
__________________
Git'er done!
     
     
  #8564  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:23 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
C'mon we west coast, take it easy!
     
     
  #8565  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:25 AM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
...
     
     
  #8566  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:26 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Edmonton is only 3 hours away from Calgary not 4. Unless of course you do 70 on the QE2.
I checked, and you're right. Still doesn't disprove my point though. It takes an hour and 15 to get from London to the start of the GTA's sprawl. 2 hours from Toronto its self. It's still quite a difference compared to Calgary-Edmonton.
     
     
  #8567  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:29 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
I checked, and you're right. Still doesn't disprove my point though. It takes an hour and 15 to get from London to the start of the GTA's sprawl. 2 hours from Toronto its self. It's still quite a difference compared to Calgary-Edmonton.
I guess it depends on what you're used to. Living in Vancouver, people go to Seattle a lot which is about a 3 hour trip. You really don't have to plan for it. That's funny you say that, because when I imagine myself living in Calgary or Edmonton I always think about how nice it is that they're so close together and I could visit the other one all the time
     
     
  #8568  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:29 AM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
How is Van 90% bigger than Calgary when it's only 2 1/2 times the size? By that logic Toronto should be 90% bigger than Montreal too.
for Toronto to be 100% larger than Mtl, TO would have to be 8M.
     
     
  #8569  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:31 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaterMontréal View Post
I used 1.3 for Calgary, that's why.
I know they were 1.3 in the 2011 census, but I think I saw they were 1.4 in 2013 somewhere. Small difference, doesn't change the fact that Vancouver is much bigger and metropolitan.
     
     
  #8570  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:31 AM
ZeDgE ZeDgE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
I checked, and you're right. Still doesn't disprove my point though. It takes an hour and 15 to get from London to the start of the GTA's sprawl. 2 hours from Toronto its self. It's still quite a difference compared to Calgary-Edmonton.
Red Deer is only 1.5 hrs away.
     
     
  #8571  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:36 AM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
I checked, and you're right. Still doesn't disprove my point though. It takes an hour and 15 to get from London to the start of the GTA's sprawl. 2 hours from Toronto its self. It's still quite a difference compared to Calgary-Edmonton.
That's the west for you, cities are fairly isolated out here. It's about 7 hours to Regina, 12 or 13 to Winnipeg and 10 to Vancouver. Forget about big US cities, they are way too far. The only ones you could make it to in a day are Salt Lake and Seattle, and those are probably both about 13 hours.
__________________
Git'er done!
     
     
  #8572  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:39 AM
Tone's Avatar
Tone Tone is offline
Riki beach
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rimouski, Qc
Posts: 3,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
since Calgary's primary skyline is larger than MTL by a significant margin. Population-wise, no.
I though this was an interesting view superposition (everybody is cool, this is just for fun!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
     
     
  #8573  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:39 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I guess it depends on what you're used to. Living in Vancouver, people go to Seattle a lot which is about a 3 hour trip. You really don't have to plan for it. That's funny you say that, because when I imagine myself living in Calgary or Edmonton I always think about how nice it is that they're so close together and I could visit the other one all the time
You're probably right to a point. I'd still say that a 3 hour trip would take some thought, like "is there a chance I'll need to stay the night if I'm getting tired", and at the very least warrants one rest from the road per trip.

Southern Ontario is just really densely populated. The trip from London to Toronto you pass through Woodstock, Brantford and Hamilton, or Woodstock, KW and Guelph (sort of) depending which route you take.
     
     
  #8574  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:39 AM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
I know they were 1.3 in the 2011 census, but I think I saw they were 1.4 in 2013 somewhere. Small difference, doesn't change the fact that Vancouver is much bigger and metropolitan.
yeah, with %, it puts things in perspective. like salary raises lol
     
     
  #8575  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:44 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaterMontréal View Post
yeah, with %, it puts things in perspective. like salary raises lol
And you were nice to Calgary by rounding the % down to 90. 1.3 vs 2.5 is actually a 92% difference
     
     
  #8576  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:47 AM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tone View Post
I though this was an interesting view superposition (everybody is cool, this is just for fun!)
Good comparison. Montreal and Calgary have fairly similar sized skylines, but I think Calgary just takes it. You have to look at the skyline from north or south to really get an appreciation if the size though, that's pretty much the narrowest angle, It does demonstrate how big the skyline will be in the future when the Beltline and Mission and one continuous built up area.
__________________
Git'er done!
     
     
  #8577  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:50 AM
thebasketballgeek's Avatar
thebasketballgeek thebasketballgeek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Rimouski, Québec
Posts: 1,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Good comparison. Montreal and Calgary have fairly similar sized skylines, but I think Calgary just takes it. You have to look at the skyline from north or south to really get an appreciation if the size though, that's pretty much the narrowest angle, It does demonstrate how big the skyline will be in the future when the Beltline and Mission and one continuous built up area.
Montreal skyline would probably rival Tortonto if they didn't have the height restriction, but we can't change the past. And I don't think Montreal is going to take that height restriction down.
     
     
  #8578  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:52 AM
ozonemania ozonemania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozonemania View Post
The Big 3 + Calgary (are we allowed to say Big 4?) are all gorgeous. Definitely something Canada should be proud of. And they are all distinct.

By the way are those 3 Vancouver shots photoshopped/HDR'ed? I wouldn't know how to begin trying to take photographs like that.
Wow, I think I regret this post... sorry guys.

Actually my thoughts at the time of that post was just that Canada has some great skylines that punch above it's weight vis-a-vis their populations.

BUt those Vancouver pics... hmmm -- reminds me of something like Atlantis or Brigadoon... one of those mythical, ethereal, fictional places that appear out of the mist. Unfortunately that kind of skyline pic is a bit contrived. Very few people get to see the city from that perspective on a regular basis.
     
     
  #8579  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:54 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebasketballgeek View Post
Montreal skyline would probably rival Tortonto if they didn't have the height restriction, but we can't change the past. And I don't think Montreal is going to take that height restriction down.
I disagree. I was underwhelmed with the large distances between the tall buildings in Montreal. Montreal isn't that much shorter than Calgary's - height restriction and all - but with Calgary's towers literally right next to each other, it makes for a much more impressive skyline. Neither of them comes close to Toronto's intensity though.
     
     
  #8580  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 3:58 AM
Tone's Avatar
Tone Tone is offline
Riki beach
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rimouski, Qc
Posts: 3,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Good comparison. Montreal and Calgary have fairly similar sized skylines, but I think Calgary just takes it. You have to look at the skyline from north or south to really get an appreciation if the size though, that's pretty much the narrowest angle, It does demonstrate how big the skyline will be in the future when the Beltline and Mission and one continuous built up area.
I take that the ''Mission'' area would be located south of the Beltline around the white dome i supposed.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:13 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.