Quote:
|
Transit issues can be addressed and are well worth the investment on the peninsula where we have the greatest potential for density (and taxpayers to fund this enterprise).
|
I'm just laying out that they're easier addressed in Shannon Park, and that addressing them in Peninsular Halifax is likely more costly.
Quote:
|
Shannon Park is not a central location when you take into consideration where most people in HRM live. The geographical centre is much further northwest.
|
Well technically the geographical center is probably over water. If you took into account where most people live, it would probably be somewhere along the waterfront on the Halifax side, or something along those lines.
But if you look at how transit is currently laid out, you begin to see the benefits right away: being at the McKay bridge, this is already a location likely to be some sort of transit hub in the long-term future, just a secondary one to the McDonald bridge. If you look at the routes in from Bedford and even the 118, a very minimal amount of time is spent by those cars in Dartmouth, let alone Halifax, which they would never enter.
It is true that we now replace congestion of Dartmouth fans on the bridge with Halifax fans on the bridge. But I disagree with this statement:
Quote:
|
Most people going to these games will be from HRM. A stadium in Shannon Park would mean much higher levels of congestion on the MacKay Bridge.
|
This is only one potential route back into Halifax. Those living downtown or the south end or even the southern part of the north end could opt to head down Windmill Road and take the McDonald.
Plus, you know, ferry option.
Because Shannon Park doesn't have a lot immediately around it, you could start building a lot of this stuff without having to demolish a whole lot of what's already existing.
Quote:
I agree; Shannon Park isn't ideal.
We can do better than just "close enough."
|
But what would we be sacrificing in terms of cost? It's not that better can't be done, it's what are we really getting for that much better density? Are we really getting as much bang for our buck in choosing a North End location over Shannon Park?
I think there's something to be said on the density front in your analysis (although others even disagree on that point, as per above), but there's other factors to consider as well, among them cost, ease of construction, ease of transit, and even just plain how it's going to look.
Quote:
|
Saying "it's central enough" gives me the impression that Shannon Park is mediocre.
|
On the density argument... it's not?
Quote:
|
What is the most central location?
|
Downtown, of course. But that's not feasible.