HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9461  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 9:35 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
^ Just because you don't understand it doesn't make it ok to call cultural differences stupid, rubbish, inane, etc.
     
     
  #9462  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 10:03 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTA View Post
^ Just because you don't understand it doesn't make it ok to call cultural differences stupid, rubbish, inane, etc.
Oh I understand it just fine. In fact I'm pretty sure it's common knowledge that many Asian buyers don't like the number 4 because it sounds like the word for death in their languages. Anybody who's been following the condo market in Toronto for the last decade probably knows that because it's far from an uncommon practice to skip floors 4, 13, etc.

It's still dumb.

It's part of my family's culture to hang a pendant in your house to ward off the "evil eye".

Still dumb.

I don't care from which culture they originate - superstitions are dumb.

Tell 'em Stevie...


Video Link

Last edited by Ramako; Jan 14, 2014 at 10:19 PM.
     
     
  #9463  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 11:25 PM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post

It's ridiculous to skip floor numbers IMO but whatever.
Totally agree. If you don't like the number 4, 13 etc don't buy on those floors. In some Asian cultures the number 8 is considered lucky. Perhaps the condos should just number every single floor as 8. It's about as logical as skipping 13.
     
     
  #9464  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 11:50 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Some new 1 Yonge Renders.

Developer is saying one of the buildings is/will be a Supertall.

Anyways.... Looks like these guys are gearing up....

     
     
  #9465  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 11:58 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
That looks f*cking sweet!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9466  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:02 AM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
and more from here

http://blog.newinhomes.com/news/anson-kwok-pinnacle-discusses-1-yonge-master-plan-1/



Those towers on the left are on the LCBO lands right?
     
     
  #9467  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:08 AM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
DELETED, new message below.
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #9468  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:10 AM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Reading the article in the above link it's not clear whether they mean "supertall" in the same sense as it is commonly used on here, ie 300m or taller. I interpret the blog's use of "super tall" to mean a very tall tower. They even state that "The actual height of a super tall tower doesn't really matter."

I'm not wanting to put a downer on the excitement, just keeping a level head.
I for one would love a tower to break that magic figure of 300m here in Toronto, and I love the designs of that proposed at One Yonge.
     
     
  #9469  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:13 AM
suburbanite's Avatar
suburbanite suburbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto & NYC
Posts: 5,647
I don't think I've ever heard the word supertall used objectively outside of this forum. At first glance the tallest in the new picture doesn't seem to be 10+ m taller than the old one.
__________________
Discontented suburbanite since 1994
     
     
  #9470  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:14 AM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
EDIT: Yeah, withdrawing my statements after reading that article, not clear if he means a 300m+ tower, just confirms 88 floors and he's throwing the "supertall" monicker quite casually.
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #9471  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:21 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
I like how people laugh or poke fun at the 4's being skipped, and mention nothing about the 13th. :p
Why? They may be out there but, I haven't seen a single buildings with 4s but no 13 that was built in the last 25 years in Toronto.
     
     
  #9472  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:28 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Some new 1 Yonge Renders.

Developer is saying one of the buildings is/will be a Supertall.

Anyways.... Looks like these guys are gearing up....

Too many towers crammed on a common podium. Yeah, doesn't do it for me. My ideal would be one or fewer towers, separate bases and one topping 300+ metres. Oh maybe not. The height just look ridiculous compared to Pinnacle Centre and 18 Yonge.
     
     
  #9473  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:33 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
We've been pondernig here, if the city might give Pinnacle some leeway if they propose few towers, on a smaller floorpate, and set back further from the street to allow more sunlight into the new waterfront area. If that is the case, one or two of the towers might end up being supertalls, if they take it down a notch from 6 towers to 4 towers.

Right now, I believe they have one tower at 293 meters, another at 262 meters and 2 more at between 240 meters to 250 meters. So, I could see two "supertalls" over 300 meters in exchange for fewer towers and smaller floorplates set back further from the street.
     
     
  #9474  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 12:57 AM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 11,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaterMontréal View Post
Great tower, but they should use another pic, the Bow looks like a cube.
''TELUS Sky will not be the tallest building in Calgary, its completed height will be approximately 20 metres shorter than The Bow building.

Read more: http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/telus-sky-set-...downtown-skyline-1.1353434#ixzz2qLot78Ss''

<snip>
looks a lot better here.
This actually got me thinking... I'm going to be making quite a few more trips up to the observation deck on the Calgary Tower over the next three or four years, with all the new construction in view. Might make a good excuse for a dinner engagement at Sky 360.
__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr
     
     
  #9475  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 1:03 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
We should have an SSP meetup in the tower! Could be fun...

I wonder if we could do a big reservation for the restaurant, if people would be willing to pay that much
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9476  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 1:11 AM
Spring2008 Spring2008 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lower Mount Royal, Calgary
Posts: 5,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankieFlowerpot View Post
and more from here

http://blog.newinhomes.com/news/anson-kwok-pinnacle-discusses-1-yonge-master-plan-1/



Those towers on the left are on the LCBO lands right?
Looks really interesting, maybe a bit crammed and it would be even better possibly if the heights were staggered. What's the FAR on this block!??
     
     
  #9477  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 1:16 AM
uzi's Avatar
uzi uzi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,647
orgasmic.
build this build this build this build thiiiiiiiiiis.
__________________
RESPECT FOR EVERYONE
     
     
  #9478  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 1:23 AM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 11,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
We should have an SSP meetup in the tower! Could be fun...

I wonder if we could do a big reservation for the restaurant, if people would be willing to pay that much
What you do is make a reservation ahead of time and go at lunch. The fee to go up the tower gets waived and, if you consider the views and access to the observation deck, the $16 burger isn't that bad.
__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr
     
     
  #9479  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 2:28 AM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrNest View Post
I'm not wanting to put a downer on the excitement, just keeping a level head.
I for one would love a tower to break that magic figure of 300m here in Toronto, and I love the designs of that proposed at One Yonge.
Would be nice, but I don't think these will do it. The tallest in the new renderings does not look 300m+. Besides, we already have tentative heights in the 290s for the tallest of 1-7 Yonge.
The 300 m/1000 ft Toronto Skyscraper Glass Ceiling™ remains intact.
     
     
  #9480  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2014, 2:40 AM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Once more I am in agreement with you Gresto. Whilst I would love to see the 300m mark broken, it is unlikely to be at the One Yonge project. If anything, I still think the Oxford twins are our best bet.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.