HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3101  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2013, 5:48 PM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
and it begins...

https://twitter.com/news1130traffic/status/415538956185239553

Quote:
News1130 Traffic

‏@news1130traffic

9:45 #SURREYBC watch for RADAR on South Fraser Perimeter Rd eastbound near Old Yale Rd
     
     
  #3102  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2013, 5:50 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,652
Year end quota gold mine!
     
     
  #3103  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2013, 6:49 PM
TransitJack TransitJack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 443
This barrier configuration seems so ill designed. I guess if they were trying to create a space for emergency vehicles to park, but then the cop car pictured seems to me to be in a precarious position.

If the lines are hard to see in the dark, rain, snow, fog, etc, we do tend to rely on the placement of barriers to 'guide' us along the road, yet this section doing so would be hazardous.

Also, shouldn't they have hashed out the entire section between yellow lines? I looks like an extra lane, and the barrier placement really would confuse me as I made my way down here.
     
     
  #3104  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2013, 7:15 PM
Flash604 Flash604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 53
I had to pick up my stepson at YVR yesterday, which meant driving at least part of the SFPR as it is now the route to take from the valley. I took advantage of the opportunity and drove the entire length so I could get GPS traces to use to tweak the road in Google Maps. My route was the entire length westbound and then I turned around and came back to Highway 99 (didn't have time to make it back to the Alex Fraser); then after picking him up we came back down the 99 and drove the remainder eastbound.

Even with that detour after picking him up the trip home was extremely fast compared to what someone coming from the valley endured in the past. Driving a bit over the limit, from the YVR parking to the McCallum Road exit was exactly an hour. I could see the road as actually being a boon to businesses in Richmond and Delta; they will no longer automatically be off the list if I need something I can't get in the valley. I'll get a better idea when I return him to the airport in the middle of the day on Friday.

My observations for the road in general match what most people have already said. One thing that caught be by surprise, and since no one else mentioned it I wonder if I saw it wrong, but coming westbound and approaching the first intersection at 116 Street I suddenly saw a 50 km/h sign. Can anyone else confirm?
     
     
  #3105  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2013, 7:26 PM
jlenko jlenko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Willoughby
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_leafs_go02 View Post
Oh, bang on! Did I call that one or what?
     
     
  #3106  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2013, 7:27 PM
jlenko jlenko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Willoughby
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash604 View Post
One thing that caught be by surprise, and since no one else mentioned it I wonder if I saw it wrong, but coming westbound and approaching the first intersection at 116 Street I suddenly saw a 50 km/h sign. Can anyone else confirm?
Yup. Left over from the time when the 136th street intersection was turned off. There's still a "reduce speed" construction sign before that as well.
     
     
  #3107  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2013, 9:32 AM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash604 View Post
One thing that caught be by surprise, and since no one else mentioned it I wonder if I saw it wrong, but coming westbound and approaching the first intersection at 116 Street I suddenly saw a 50 km/h sign. Can anyone else confirm?
Skip to about 7:20. My video.

Video Link
     
     
  #3108  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2013, 4:38 PM
Spork's Avatar
Spork Spork is offline
Shoebox Dweller
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,784
Can the thread title be changed to "Completed"?
     
     
  #3109  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2013, 1:45 AM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spork View Post
Can the thread title be changed to "Completed"?
No. Only when the interchanges are built and in service
By that standard, we need a threat for Hwy 91 U/C too.

Re: Speed Trap: Wow, that didn't take long AT ALL.
The holiday season is about to ruined for the unlucky few who miss the 50 sign (or ignore it!).
I'll remember to take this section seriously when I drive it!
     
     
  #3110  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2013, 8:00 PM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 923
isn't it 70-80 on lougheed where it is separated and has various intersections?

50 there is completely mind boggling.

80 is even LOW in my opinion.
     
     
  #3111  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2013, 8:10 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash604 View Post
My observations for the road in general match what most people have already said. One thing that caught be by surprise, and since no one else mentioned it I wonder if I saw it wrong, but coming westbound and approaching the first intersection at 116 Street I suddenly saw a 50 km/h sign. Can anyone else confirm?
You are correct. They have a 50kph limit sign still there headed westbound just before the intersection. Then when you pass it there is an 80kph sign. Not sure if that is on purpose or they never removed the 50kph sign which is what was posted there during construction. I didn't see one eastbound.

Guess we'll see over the next month or 2 if it stays there.
     
     
  #3112  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 8:50 PM
Flash604 Flash604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 53
It appears the other site was taken down as it was a construction website, and it has been replaced with http://www.sfprhighway17.ca.
     
     
  #3113  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 9:06 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,969
Curious............is there any other city on the planet that builds a 4 lane road with lights and intersections and then calls it an "expressway"?
     
     
  #3114  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 9:45 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Curious............is there any other city on the planet that builds a 4 lane road with lights and intersections and then calls it an "expressway"?
Took more than 20 years for them to remove the stoplights from HWY91.

Even the upper level HWY1 had stoplights when it was introduced!
__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
     
     
  #3115  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 9:54 PM
tybuilding tybuilding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 898
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Curious............is there any other city on the planet that builds a 4 lane road with lights and intersections and then calls it an "expressway"?
It can be an expressway as set up. According to Wikipedia at least: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expressway? If the SFPR is turned into Highway 91 type freeway I would be mad. It is supposed to be a bike route. Are they going to add overpasses for all of the cycling crossings of the ramps? Are they going to add separated bike paths? Probably not. The Gateway program is supposed to be for cycling as well. It has helped a bit but it has failed to improve cycling in many areas, especially Coquitlam where it remains pathetic.

My view from the bike lane by the Alex Fraser Bridge:



I biked between Nordel and Grace Road, which is for officially authorized vehicles only but I wanted to cut off the distance to get to the Scott Road bike path.
     
     
  #3116  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 10:22 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Curious............is there any other city on the planet that builds a 4 lane road with lights and intersections and then calls it an "expressway"?
Funny you should say that. I've often wondered much the same thing about "expressways" in Vancouver.
Until they put the real intersections in North Van Highway 1, it still had lights at Lonsdale and Westview, but was listed as an expressway.

Futher, why, (with exception of Cape Horn, of course,) can't they seem to count above 4 for real expressways.
The Richmond Freeway is 4 lanes, and I recall, years back, being in a jam on it that lasted an hour or more. Underbuilt the day it opened.
     
     
  #3117  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 10:25 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Why people want to cycle on the shoulders of highways is beyond me. It should be illegal. Like in ontario, no biking on 400 highways.
     
     
  #3118  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2013, 11:09 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Why people want to cycle on the shoulders of highways is beyond me. It should be illegal. Like in ontario, no biking on 400 highways.
I agree, what with all of the well-maintained, properly-lit, and direct cycling paths that we have parallel to our regional highway network.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #3119  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 12:16 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Yes Its unfortunate we dont have more cycling paths... So risk your life biking beside 100km/hr trucks instead lol. Personally, I just think it's dumb. Drive or take transit.. There's going to be people hell bent on biking everywhere that's their choice

Last edited by osirisboy; Dec 29, 2013 at 12:30 AM.
     
     
  #3120  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 2:57 AM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
I cycle because raising kids I don't have time to exercise alone, I have to integrate it into my commute.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:06 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.