HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9101  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2013, 8:14 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gresto View Post
Caltrane, you've been slacking lately. So few photo updates.
I don't think the "Yorkville skyline" will, when all is said and done, extend any farther than Belmont/Davenport and west to Avenue Rd. For the foreseeable future, those are the realistic northern and western borders for that cluster, at the very most, but maybe I'm talking out of my ass.
What's the latest on Holt Renfrew? I'd particularly like to see that one get approved and underway.

That's Toronto's problem, from a skyline fan's perspective. There isn't really one vantage point where everything can be captured, certainly not North York and Scarborough in a shot with downtown, let alone Mississauga, which isn't part of TO. Plus, there are the beginnings of a pretty decent skyline at 401/Leslie/Don Mills.
One unsung vantage for seeing downtown and Yorkville is Allen Rd. south of Sheppard. Sure, it's a tad distant from downtown (15-20 km), but it's on a higher grade with a descending sightline, and Downsview airport to the south permits an unobstructed view downtown. I drove through there a couple of days ago, and Aura and Four Seasons, along with the old CBD, were standing tall.

DiD some video and photo updates today
     
     
  #9102  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2013, 9:24 PM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,272
I was kidding! You have no obligation to keep us in pictures.
     
     
  #9103  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2013, 12:01 AM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Not U/C yet, but they are currently demolishing the L'Avenue (175m) sales office and installing fences around the site. Excavation will probably start after the Holidays.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspetit View Post

     
     
  #9104  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2013, 1:22 AM
Mamiamato24's Avatar
Mamiamato24 Mamiamato24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 240
Nice to see some work on the site
__________________
Canada
     
     
  #9105  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2013, 6:25 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Shoring Application for 10 York makes it seem as though the building is actually 69 floors plus mechanical not 65 floors plus mechanical

Quote:
According to the City of Toronto's application status web site, the status of the Shoring Permit application for 10 York Street is, as of December 9:

Application: Partial Permit Status: Under Review

Location: 130 HARBOUR ST TORONTO ON

Application#: 13 195531 SHO 00 PP Accepted Date: Jun 27, 2013

Project: Mixed Use/Res w Non Res Partial Permit - Shoring

Description: Part Permit - Proposal to construct a 69 sty + mechanical condo building with 5 levels of below grade parking, 694 residential units, and commercial.

New Address - 10 York St (additional addresses 120, 130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street).
Anyways, I'm gonna be down in Southcore today, to check out the scenerio..
     
     
  #9106  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2013, 9:33 PM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,272
^Hmm, I wonder if the height stays the same. They've probably lowered ceiling heights.
     
     
  #9107  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2013, 9:54 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
I think it was 68 floors all along and the height remains the same.
     
     
  #9108  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2013, 10:41 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,849
unit count is still the same, no changes. probably just counting mechanical or something.
     
     
  #9109  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2013, 1:10 AM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,272
Ah.
     
     
  #9110  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2013, 1:17 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Check out the newest iteration of the Calgary Construction Thread, this is the 18the edition of the listing. A couple of Canada's 50 tallest proposals are on the list.


http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=208815
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9111  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2013, 9:16 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Here is something you don't see everyday. DRP panelist thinks 1 Yorkville should go higher.. lol! It's 188 meters as we stand right now.


Quote:
However, Panel also felt that the proposal would be improved by conforming to the Tall Building Guidelines requirements relating to floor plate size and setback requirements, particularly to the north.

– One Member suggested that the consideration of additional height might be a suitable tradeoff if it was to help resolve these issues, including their impact on the public realm (also see comments in Shadows, below)

Full Report from AoD at UT
     
     
  #9112  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2013, 10:25 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
So according to reliable sources on the Calgary section, the residential floors of Telus Sky will be rental apartments, possibly with some rental corporate suites. This goes to further the expectation that its construction will begin next summer. Eviction of the Art Central building is still on track for next month, with demolition of said building to begin soon after. The building is two floors above grade with one floor below grade, so demolition will not take long at all.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9113  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2013, 11:10 PM
Design-mind's Avatar
Design-mind Design-mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,652
Here is a proposal for Edmonton. 71 storey Office/residential tower (278 M).

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/storey+Edmontonian+would+dominate+city+skyline/9109100/story.html
     
     
  #9114  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2013, 11:57 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Design-mind View Post
Here is a proposal for Edmonton. 71 storey Office/residential tower (278 M).

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/storey+Edmontonian+would+dominate+city+skyline/9109100/story.html
This tower has the potential to change future development in Edmonton. Now that the airport restrictions are gone, I could see a lot more taller towers, residential and commercial going up in Edmonton. Toronto will have it's work cut out just maintaining the same rapid pace of current construction, without the same booming economy as these Alberta cities.
     
     
  #9115  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2013, 12:38 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Several people in the Calgary section in the development community have alluded to the impending proposal of two or more towers taller than the Edmontonian with a much greater likelihood of coming to fruition. Two of them are likely supertalls.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9116  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2013, 2:02 AM
losername losername is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: world citizen
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Several people in the Calgary section in the development community have alluded to the impending proposal of two or more towers taller than the Edmontonian with a much greater likelihood of coming to fruition. Two of them are likely supertalls.
Can you post a link to thread with rumors?
     
     
  #9117  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2013, 6:49 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
If you can find this thread, you have the ability to find the Calgary Construction Thread.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9118  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2013, 6:54 AM
uzi's Avatar
uzi uzi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,647
long time, no new proposal.
__________________
RESPECT FOR EVERYONE
     
     
  #9119  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2013, 6:58 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by losername View Post
Can you post a link to thread with rumors?
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=208815
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #9120  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2013, 8:36 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Any two proposals in Calgary that would be taller than the 71 story Edmontonian (which is highly doubtful at that height), is really loose talk and highly speculative! As a contrarian, this is probably an indication that the building boom may stall or dramatically slow down over the next 5-6 years. With the exception of 225 6th, and a couple others. IMO.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:38 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.