Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamShatter
North American cities, in general, tend to be much more conservative and less innovative than some of the buildings and proposals abroad…just my opinion.
|
I agree 100%. For one reason or another, we don't see many buildings that really push the envelope. And N. Americans seem to also be resistant to "disrupting" historical districts with modern design. The Europeans do it all the time, which is ironic since their historic districts are usually much older than ours; and their modern buildings are much edgier, too.
The stuff that's getting built in Asia is really amazing but of course, it's a heck of a lot easier to go all out with a design when you pay your workers peanuts and don't have to hire lawyers to fight through red tape and NIMBYs. Wages in China are very low and in the Arab world, those buildings are being built practically by slave labor.
And here in our great city (and throughout N. America), most of the great old architecture was built under similar conditions (no unions, lax zoning, no NIMBY influence, etc.). Developers could - and did - spend lavishly on expensive materials and intricate designs. Do you realize you prohibitively expensive City Hall would be to build today?