Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed
I've driven to SF literally for lunch (the drive was the entire point).
|
Erm...wow. I just looked on Google Maps: your drive is 2,100 km, while the drive I did maybe four times a year in my early twenties between Hamilton and Winnipeg is 2,160 via Detroit-Chicago-Minneapolis. I usually did it with one or two tag-team partners, always in well under 24 hours. We never stopped anywhere except for gas. It was an exhausting trek into what we considered the most remote part of the continent (sorry Winnipeg, but you know it's true).
It was a great adventure. Once I did it all by myself, and spent three hours driving all over Chicago along the way. Heady stuff for a 21-year-old.
But the idea that anyone might hop in the car in Winnipeg one day in order to eat lunch the next day in Hamilton or Toronto, and then
drive back, would have been considered completely mad.
I don't really like driving long distances anymore. I don't mind the 7-hour hike from the west side of Toronto to Montreal because hey, you end up in Montreal, but that's pretty much my limit, and I wouldn't be keen for it if the destination weren't so appealing. The early twenties road trip across a large swath of America or Canada used to be a rite of passage. Do people do that anymore?