HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5981  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 6:38 PM
jimluk jimluk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
That's the planner talking. I am not sure a master plan would make any difference at all. RTD built light rail without a master plan (a real one) for a decade. What we need is a starter line. A master plan without a starter line is just something to collect dust and let planner-types drool over. To say we need to plan for the fourth line before we can build the first is just a stall tactic; an excuse to make up for a lack of movement or interest. And we don't need to plan for five lines to know which one is going to come first, either.

Might that make for some awkward re-dos in the future? Sure. But RTD managed to put the CPV line in before there was a Union Station master plan, and it doesn't appear to me that ultimately limited what could/could not happen at Union Station. Same would apply for whatever streetcar hub ends up at Civic Center in the dream master plan scenario. Planners have a bad habit of letting the future's perfect and the complete stand in the way of the present's realistic.
That being said, where do you start? The Colfax line has the most momentum but I don't see how it it feasible to not build the entire thing out to Fitzsimons at once. Where do you put in a bus to streetcar transfer if you don't? Broadway has always faced opposition. Larimer might be a good starting place, but wouldn't touch Civic Center station. That just leaves us waiting for money for Downing/Welton/N Broadway conversion that besides being somewhat inevitable won't be the showboat to sell more lines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5982  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 6:53 PM
jimluk jimluk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
Wow..fears coming true...
How hard would it be to guerrilla this? I say we create a RTD graphic design thread and do it ourselves. We would need to establish a concise set of goals, principles, and grievances to address.

Would our new transit info legibility group desire an audience with RTD leadership or would we make a bigger splash by printing our own graphics and slapping them up at stations.

Legend says that the infamous London map was created by a moonlighter and was embraced by the public before the authorities finally adopted it.

PS what do we have to do to get RTD lines to show up in Google Maps
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5983  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 6:54 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimluk View Post
That being said, where do you start? The Colfax line has the most momentum but I don't see how it it feasible to not build the entire thing out to Fitzsimons at once. Where do you put in a bus to streetcar transfer if you don't? Broadway has always faced opposition. Larimer might be a good starting place, but wouldn't touch Civic Center station. That just leaves us waiting for money for Downing/Welton/N Broadway conversion that besides being somewhat inevitable won't be the showboat to sell more lines.
Colfax is obvious. You build it as far as you can afford (if Fitz is necessary, great, that brings Aurora in as a funding partner). Bus transfers at Civic Center. The ending on the west side is tough - Auraria vs. penetrating into downtown - but we don't have to make all of the decisions at once, that is my whole point. You build something to create momentum. And at some point, if we build streetcars at all, there will be line between Broadway and Colorado on Colfax. So there's really no good excuse for dithering in the name of planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5984  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 7:05 PM
DGutz DGutz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
I was looking again at the East Line map. Is it just me, or does anyone else think that the name of the "Airport/40th" station is going to be problematic? Think of how many out-of-towners, especially international folks/ non English speakers, will be heading to DIA on the East line. They'll get to that station, see "airport...", and hop off. Might even lead to some enterprising shuttle operators lining up to take them from the "airport" station to DIA. Maybe they should rename it the "40th Ave." station? Or why not "Peña/40th"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5985  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 7:37 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGutz View Post
I was looking again at the East Line map. Is it just me, or does anyone else think that the name of the "Airport/40th" station is going to be problematic? Think of how many out-of-towners, especially international folks/ non English speakers, will be heading to DIA on the East line. They'll get to that station, see "airport...", and hop off. Might even lead to some enterprising shuttle operators lining up to take them from the "airport" station to DIA. Maybe they should rename it the "40th Ave." station? Or why not "Peña/40th"?
Easy answer - because RTD does not name stations for the use or convenience of transit riders. They are named for the use and convenience of automobile drivers looking to find the station to park-and-ride. And for that, entering "Airport and 40th" into the on-board GPS is the right answer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5986  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 8:25 PM
Zmapper Zmapper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 210
The Decatur-Federal Station on the West line is similar. At first glance it is strange for a side street to be listed before the main street. However, further down the line is Federal Center Station, which would likely result in customer confusion between "Federal-Decatur" and "Federal Center" Stations.

Airport-40th should be renamed Salida-40th to keep GPS compatibility intact while avoiding two "Airport" stations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5987  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2013, 3:15 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
Straight up 🞵🞵🞵 appeal. I just want to eat it all up. Train hall number 2 going up!



__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5988  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2013, 7:20 PM
Mulligan's Avatar
Mulligan Mulligan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGutz View Post
I was looking again at the East Line map. Is it just me, or does anyone else think that the name of the "Airport/40th" station is going to be problematic? Think of how many out-of-towners, especially international folks/ non English speakers, will be heading to DIA on the East line. They'll get to that station, see "airport...", and hop off. Might even lead to some enterprising shuttle operators lining up to take them from the "airport" station to DIA. Maybe they should rename it the "40th Ave." station? Or why not "Peña/40th"?
The station names are not finalized right now. Those were the names used in the environmental process. In the next few months, RTD will finalize station names. It may change, it may not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5989  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 3:44 AM
BG918's Avatar
BG918 BG918 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
Convenient to have a broad(right-of-)way when you want to do a lot of different stuff. I wish we had a great big wide quirky commercial street like that.
Was in Indianapolis recently. They have a nice cycle track down one of their busiest one way downtown streets. Something like this on Broadway or Lincoln would be cool. More trees/landscaping would be good too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5990  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 3:36 PM
Interzen Interzen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: La Alma/Lincoln Park - Denver, CO
Posts: 356
^^ I think that was financed by the Rock Bottom Brewery. Look how it dead ends at their door.

Interestingly, I don't see any bus stops in that picture. The bus visible in the front is in the middle lane with it's right blinker on and it's hard to tell if the one in back is in the middle or right lane.

Edit: I just thought of a new public private partnership opportunity to fund cycle tracks; The Central City Parkway model.

The track is built between two Jersey barriers and only has "exits" in front of current dues paying members of the "Broadway Cycle Track Partnership". Jersey barriers are easy to shuffle around so it would be easy to close exits for non paying members. Unfortunately I realized we would have to have a cycle track police force to enforce patronage of the proper businesses by those exiting the system and that would be cost prohibitive.

Last edited by Interzen; Nov 6, 2013 at 4:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5991  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 4:00 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is online now
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,126
Well, we're about to have another FasTracks corridor under construction in 2014:

http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploa...orth_Metro_Line_News_Release_11-5-13.pdf
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5992  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 4:43 PM
EngiNerd's Avatar
EngiNerd EngiNerd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,003
Does anyone else think that the North line will probably be the most heavily used of all of them because of the terrible traffic up that way...and the fact that a majority in that area work downtown.
__________________
"The engineer is the key figure in the material progress of the world. It is his engineering that makes a reality of the potential value of science by translating scientific knowledge into tools, resources, energy and labor to bring them into the service of man. To make contributions of this kind the engineer requires the imagination to visualize the need of society and to appreciate what is possible as well as the technological and broad social age understanding to bring his vision to reality."

Last edited by EngiNerd; Nov 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5993  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 5:07 PM
bobg bobg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngiNerd View Post
Does anyone else thing that the North line will probably be the most heavily used of all of them because of the terrible traffic up that way...and the fact that a majority in that area work downtown.
I know they attempt to factor those things into the ridership models, but I have had the same thoughts about ridership on the North line being underestimated due to where people in thornton/northglenn tend to work and the traffic they have to endure. Not necessarily that the north will be the most heavily used line, but that it could be utilized more than anticipated.

On the other hand working against the north metro corridor ridership is the current developed environment in the North metro seems to be centered around I25 so a lot of the population is further west. Additionally, there's that long stretch between 88th and DUS where it is more industrial than residential.

I guess we will see in 5 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5994  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 5:28 PM
Mulligan's Avatar
Mulligan Mulligan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
Well, we're about to have another FasTracks corridor under construction in 2014:

http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploa...orth_Metro_Line_News_Release_11-5-13.pdf
We will have a DenverUrbanism post with more on the North Metro line this afternoon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5995  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 7:08 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobg View Post
I know they attempt to factor those things into the ridership models, but I have had the same thoughts about ridership on the North line being underestimated due to where people in thornton/northglenn tend to work and the traffic they have to endure. Not necessarily that the north will be the most heavily used line, but that it could be utilized more than anticipated.

On the other hand working against the north metro corridor ridership is the current developed environment in the North metro seems to be centered around I25 so a lot of the population is further west. Additionally, there's that long stretch between 88th and DUS where it is more industrial than residential.

I guess we will see in 5 years.

The proposal to build to 124th Ave would be for a line approximately 13 miles line long, with 5 stops between 124Ave and Union Station- Eastlake/124th, 112th, 104th, 88th, 72nd, and the National Western Station.

The line, will not be electrified, and, propulsion will be via either separate diesel engine units, or distributed in some fashion by rail car.

Disadvantages of Diesel propulsion along route as planned

1. Diesel power trains accelerate far slower than electricity motored units. Diesel units work best with longer distances between stops than do emu's.

There are 5 stops, between 124th and Union Station, for a total of 7 distance intervals between terminating ends, at an average distance of approximately 1.85 miles apart.

While there are numerous variables such as weight, horsepower, grade, curve radii etc., a good figure might be that it would take 3 minutes to accelerate from 0 to 60 mph for diesel pulled commuter trains on this line, and 2 minutes to accelerate to 40 mph.

Commuter trains operating anywhere where freight rail traffic MIGHT occur, have intense, old school, FRA safety standards that end up making units very heavy. Diesel engine locomotives routinely weigh almost 120 tons and passenger rail cars on such lines 50 to 60 tons without passengers or fuel. Stopping distances (as well as acceleration distances) take far longer than do lighter vehicles.


If the average time including station stop time for passenger egress at stations + acceleration time + breaking time, were 5 minutes per interval, the net time between 124th and Union Station would be 35 minutes.

Current Services

North-South Bus service currently extends from the Market Street Station in downtown Denver to 120th Ave, via the excellent 120x. When the Underground (bus) Station is completed, the south terminal will be move into that facility.

Per RTD schedule, depending on time of day and whether the 120x stops at the DUS light rail station and the 88th Ave dedicated Bus station, trips take between 21 and 25 minutes. While weather and traffic levels can reduce trip time, dedicated bus/car pool lanes that switch in the direction of rush hour flow, reduce this risk some what between the DUS area and the Boulder Turnpike.

This bus, based upon ticket price, speed, and, distance, IMO, is the best bus in the Metro area.

What likely will happen when the North Line opens

A. The efficiency of the 120x will have be lowered to get users to switch from the 120x to the train. This will involve a combination of adding off I-25 coverage to lengthen the current transit time from 120Ave to downtown from 25 minutes to 35/40 minutes, and, by reducing the frequency of the bus.

B. Local buses which currently serve the Wagon Road 120th Ave station will be rerouted, in particular those which travel east of I-25 to funnel traffic to either the 112thAve or 124Ave Train Stations before Wagon Road, adding 10 minutes or more transit time to Wagon Road.

C. The net effect will be to increase the transit time for those who live west of I-25 who use the 120x now, while providing good commuting service (within 1 to 1.5 miles of stations and 10 minutes by car) for those that need 20 minutes currently to get to Wagon Road from east of I-25.



Solution

This, regrettably, will not occur, but, would make the line very busy.

A. Provide express service. While this requires that station users be provided access to platforms without having to cross any rail tracks on foot, the payoffs are immense. Do this and triple tracking a couple of stations could provide true express service, with the efficiency increasing the further north the line extends.

B. How to skip stations

There are two end points, 124th and Union Station- stations 1, and 7. 2 through 6 are through stations.

Stop (or start) at stations

1,3,5,7; 1,2,4,7; 1,2,5,7; 1,7 etc.,
7,5,3,1; 7,4,2,1; 7,5,2,1; 7,1 etc.

13 miles at an average speed of 60 mph is 13 minutes
13 miles at an average speed of 30 mph is 26 minutes.

C. Provide connections between the North and East lines, east of Union Station, perhaps at the 38th and Blake Station and coordinate with East line schedules. The ROW exists. Make this a big platform to platform station designed for north and east side users that do not need to go downtown.



If express services are not instituted

Extend the 120x Ave to at least E470 and provide car pool/bus lanes further north (aren't people talking about extending the car pool lanes to 104th Ave, now?)

Expect low level ridership, and, few commuters using the North line to go to work at the airport.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf

Last edited by Wizened Variations; Nov 6, 2013 at 7:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5996  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 8:19 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is online now
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
The proposal to build to 124th Ave would be for a line approximately 13 miles line long, with 5 stops between 124Ave and Union Station- Eastlake/124th, 112th, 104th, 88th, 72nd, and the National Western Station.

The line, will not be electrified, and, propulsion will be via either separate diesel engine units, or distributed in some fashion by rail car.
That seems rather out of step with what was originally stated for the North Corridor. Is it absolutely stated that the North Corridor will now be DMU instead of EMU as has been planned,designed, and is now under construction?
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5997  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 8:58 PM
bcp's Avatar
bcp bcp is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,143
hooray... but whoa whoa whoa...if the NW rail truly dies off...why don't they start the north route from the truncated line at 72nd in westy?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5998  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 9:14 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
The line, will not be electrified, and, propulsion will be via either separate diesel engine units, or distributed in some fashion by rail car.
Are you sure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
hooray... but whoa whoa whoa...if the NW rail truly dies off...why don't they start the north route from the truncated line at 72nd in westy?
That's a completely different corridor, no?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5999  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 9:25 PM
bcp's Avatar
bcp bcp is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,143
well...not really - it's not a corridor at all if it only goes to 72nd...hook a right and head north...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6000  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2013, 10:03 PM
Mulligan's Avatar
Mulligan Mulligan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
That seems rather out of step with what was originally stated for the North Corridor. Is it absolutely stated that the North Corridor will now be DMU instead of EMU as has been planned,designed, and is now under construction?
The North Metro line will be EMU - the exact same cars as are going to be run along the East and Gold Lines. The corridor will not be DMU.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:14 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.