HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5941  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2013, 5:56 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
Better video from this morning showing the two new segments of the outbound guideway.
     
     
  #5942  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2013, 6:06 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
Better video from this morning showing the two new segments of the outbound guideway.
Nice! Thanks dpogue!

It looks like they are concrete girders, so I was right on this part that they will be consistent with what is already in Lougheed Station, as oppose to steel. What will happen afterwards...we shall see.

Edit: After looking at the end of the concrete girder on the outbound platform carefully, the gap seems to indicate that something very large will be placed just after it. From that part onward, it will likely not be the boxy concrete girder but looks like a large preformed curved girder will be placed there (think those curvy girders near Braid). Not sure whether it will be concrete or steel...we shall see.



I guess the next big thing would be seeing how the beam would look like for those two columns immediately after the existing Lougheed station guideways to take the differences in grade changes.

Is it me or is the column directly beside Whitespot has a really large circumference? I'm not sure about the one beside North Road, maybe that too has a large circumference?

Last edited by queetz@home; Nov 4, 2013 at 6:21 PM. Reason: Adding a screenshot
     
     
  #5943  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 12:18 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,754
Those columns could be large circumference if they are "T" or "Y" columns to support two separate single guideways at the different heights.

Think of the "Iris" column proposed for the defunct Seattle monorail extension:


http://www.monorails.org/tmspages/IrisEd.html

which I think are better than the Bangkok version (loaded single side):


http://www.bangkoksite.com/Transportation/SkyTrain.htm

Last edited by officedweller; Nov 5, 2013 at 12:48 AM.
     
     
  #5944  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 1:10 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,754
That box to be pushed under Barnet Highway on Remembrance Day weekend now looks like a box:

October 30, 2013:

http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit

November 2, 2013:

http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit

November 4, 2013:

http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit
     
     
  #5945  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 3:52 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
^^ Interesting...I guess they are going to punch a hole underneath that roadway and push the box on it? Over the course of a weekend or two?

Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
While the Lougheed station area guideways won't look exactly like this, I guess this pic gives us an idea on what to expect to see with the difference in grade between the outbound and inbound guideways.
     
     
  #5946  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 4:50 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
^^ Interesting...I guess they are going to punch a hole underneath that roadway and push the box on it? Over the course of a weekend or two?
Either a hole or a trench. I think I read that the road surface will be removed.

The Bangkok columns are like the original model with the guideway basketweave:


http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?p=5478369&highlight=lougheed+guideway#post5478369
     
     
  #5947  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 5:07 AM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
That box to be pushed under Barnet Highway on Remembrance Day weekend now looks like a box:

October 30, 2013:

http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit

November 2, 2013:

http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit

November 4, 2013:

http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit
Wow cant wait to see a video of the slip. I would assume they would hydrovac and slip at the same time and remove the spoil at the rear between the rams
     
     
  #5948  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 5:26 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Inlet Centre is going to be an amazing station when complete.
     
     
  #5949  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 5:43 AM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
Edit: After looking at the end of the concrete girder on the outbound platform carefully, the gap seems to indicate that something very large will be placed just after it. From that part onward, it will likely not be the boxy concrete girder but looks like a large preformed curved girder will be placed there (think those curvy girders near Braid). Not sure whether it will be concrete or steel...we shall see.

[image snipped]

I guess the next big thing would be seeing how the beam would look like for those two columns immediately after the existing Lougheed station guideways to take the differences in grade changes.

Is it me or is the column directly beside Whitespot has a really large circumference? I'm not sure about the one beside North Road, maybe that too has a large circumference?
It looks like two small columns in the space formerly used for the Lougheed Bus Loop, and then 3 thicker columns heading up North Road, starting at the White Spot. You can't see in the video, but the wire mesh for the column in the White Spot parking lot definitely has a bigger circumference.
Aside from the first column being split into two smaller ones, it seems in line with the model of the basketweave.

It would not surprise me if they switched to steel for the curving section. I recall in a documentary video about the Expo line they mentioned using steel for the curve over the Grandview cut entering Broadway because it was lighter than concrete.

At present, it's looking like the columns will be set up like this (indicated in teal, map image from Bing Maps):


It's really great to see progress on other parts of the line too!
     
     
  #5950  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 6:19 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
That's a cool diagram and gives you a much better perspective. I found it hard to visualize base on the videos and ground photos. But the placement makes sense. I guess those guideways will have fairly long curved segments, eh?
     
     
  #5951  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 7:03 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
From what I understand from the discussion so far, is that east of Lougheed Station one Evergreen guideway will elevate higher than the other and cross over the lower one. Do I understand that correctly? And if so, why on earth is that the case?
     
     
  #5952  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 7:11 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
From what I understand from the discussion so far, is that east of Lougheed Station one Evergreen guideway will elevate higher than the other and cross over the lower one. Do I understand that correctly? And if so, why on earth is that the case?
See this post for the published train movements through Lougheed Station.
Evergreen trains bound for Vnacouver will stop at the middle platform as shown on the diagram at this post:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=6131812&postcount=4207

This provides a cross-platfdorm transfer for M-Line passngers from New Westminster transferrig to Vancouver (and allows M-Line trains to through route to Vnacouver if ever desired (not curremtly planned) - while avoiding the "Lower Bay" problem of two platforms with a common destination.

In order for the trains to get to that platform, the original 1999 plan was for a basket weave. Due to cost savings, there will instead be a level track switch near Burquitlam Station, as shown on the diagram.

(and yes, it looks like a switchng nightmare)
     
     
  #5953  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 7:32 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
See this post for the published train movements through Lougheed Station.
Evergreen trains bound for Vnacouver will stop at the middle platform as shown on the diagram at this post:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=6131812&postcount=4207

This provides a cross-platfdorm transfer for M-Line passngers from New Westminster transferrig to Vancouver (and allows M-Line trains to through route to Vnacouver if ever desired (not curremtly planned) - while avoiding the "Lower Bay" problem of two platforms with a common destination.

In order for the trains to get to that platform, the original 1999 plan was for a basket weave. Due to cost savings, there will instead be a level track switch near Burquitlam Station, as shown on the diagram.

(and yes, it looks like a switchng nightmare)
Thank you for your response.

That makes no sense to me. I don't understand why Evergreen trains bound for Douglas College Station don't simply depart from the existing "Lougheed outbound platform" and cross the westbound Millennium track immediately after departing Lougheed Station, with no need for a new "Lougheed side platform." One platform with all trains entering and exiting on the proper sides. Clean and simple.

Why would they build a completely new north platform and necessitate such a mess?

Last edited by Prometheus; Nov 5, 2013 at 8:20 AM.
     
     
  #5954  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 7:35 AM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,100
That looks like it will be so fun to ride when it's done. Lets just hope they've gotten the hang of high-speed switches or it will be a lot of crawling in and out of the stations.

Also yes, they used steel beams over the Grandview cut because it was cheaper than using concrete.
     
     
  #5955  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 4:55 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
Thank you for your response.

That makes no sense to me. I don't understand why Evergreen trains bound for Douglas College Station don't simply depart from the existing "Lougheed outbound platform" and cross the westbound Millennium track immediately after departing Lougheed Station, with no need for a new "Lougheed side platform." One platform with all trains entering and exiting on the proper sides. Clean and simple.

Why would they build a completely new north platform and necessitate such a mess?
You need the new platform for the terminating Millennium Line train at Lougheed.
     
     
  #5956  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 5:23 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,719
The two smaller columns will likely support a 'bent' across the road lane, which is essentially a lentil spanning two columns. (example: http://goo.gl/maps/TV0dJ)
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #5957  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 7:26 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIPS View Post
That looks like it will be so fun to ride when it's done. Lets just hope they've gotten the hang of high-speed switches or it will be a lot of crawling in and out of the stations.
There are plenty of switches on the existing lines that the trains take at high speed. The storage track between Nanaimo and Broadway stations is one example.

Speed restrictions at switches are usually due to noise issues or because of the sharp turn a train has to make when taking the diverging track.
     
     
  #5958  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 8:15 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
That platform was already built structurally, might as well use it. Would allow for full line segregation if one of the lines went down.

Too bad Columbia doesn't have that third platform.
     
     
  #5959  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 8:24 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
There are plenty of switches on the existing lines that the trains take at high speed. The storage track between Nanaimo and Broadway stations is one example.

Speed restrictions at switches are usually due to noise issues or because of the sharp turn a train has to make when taking the diverging track.
In this case it's not the fact that there are switches, it's the fact that they will be switching frequently because the inbound/outbound cross over each other in two places (before Lougheed and before Burquitlam). There will likely be delays as trains have to wait for the switches to move.
There's also a segment at Lougheed that is shared between the M-Line inbound and EG-Line inbound, but with the M-Line switching a few meters later. I guess if it becomes a problem, TransLink could use the TCH pocket and run single-track between there and Lougheed on the current outbound guideway.

(Aside: Do we have a single-letter designation for Evergreen Line? EG-Line? G-Line? E-Line2?)
     
     
  #5960  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2013, 8:27 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
In this case it's not the fact that there are switches, it's the fact that they will be switching frequently because the inbound/outbound cross over each other in two places (before Lougheed and before Burquitlam). There will likely be delays as trains have to wait for the switches to move.
The switches actually change fairly quickly. I think the reason it "takes a long time" is because the train control system won't permit the switch to change if it's in an occupancy block that's assigned to a train. That's not something that's going to change.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.