Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect
It's literally comments based on looking at a picture and remarking on that picture.
I wouldn't look at this picture and argue that it's not flat outside of the main centre:
That's everything that's going on here.
|
I understand, but the two pictures were completely different. The Ottawa one looked to have been taken only about 5 km from the city core on a horizontal view, whereas the Calgary photo was a airplane aerial/birds eye view taken from 10+ km from the city core, and completely missing the surrounding suburban highrise clusters like SAIT, Uni Cal, Brentwood, etc. At least if they were going to be unequal photo viewpoints, the one of Calgary could have been at least as flattering as Ottawa's was. I understand that Ottawa has way more short buildings than Calgary, but our level of intensification is far faster.
If we're going to be in such a pissing match again, let's at least state facts. We not only have just a few dozen less 35+ meter towers than Ottawa, but our tallest building is over twice as tall and we have over 13x as many 100+ meter towers completed/UC than the entire Ottawa metro area. I like height, and even with our extravagant amount of height for a city our size, we still do veryyy well in urbanity (in my view).
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls
Pal - everyone is ignorant on this here site. This is why we must edjumatate! 
|
This is true!