HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8821  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 12:36 AM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
^^ Why?

I like that latest Edmonton proposal. Worlds better than previous "Edmontonian"
Just going by city size. The bigger city should have the taller tower.
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
     
     
  #8822  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 12:57 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denscity View Post
^^^ If Edmonton builds a tower this tall then Vancouver must eliminate all height limits downtown!!
That line of reasoning isn't sound. Calgary already has several buildings taller than Vancouver and Montreal. Edmonton building a tower taller has no bearing on any other city, plus Vancouver's view cone legislation serves its purpose. Part of Vancouver's appeal is the amazing view of the surrounding mountains in conjunction with the stunning skyline. Edmonton could beat all three with this proposal, if it comes to fruition.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8823  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 1:21 AM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,295
The Edmonton tower is very nice, but it doesn't look 278m, imo.
     
     
  #8824  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 1:25 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Holy, the second tallest building in the country?

Good Lord, talk about starting from the bottom ...

And going straight to the top.
     
     
  #8825  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:36 AM
coolcanadian coolcanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
What an exciting time for Canada!!!

80 Bloor:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruzin4u View Post
Some additional renderings.





     
     
  #8826  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:45 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Not bad! That first render almost looked like the redesign of Tower Verre in NYC at first glance.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8827  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:45 AM
Mrs Sauga Mrs Sauga is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 730
Those last 2 Yorkville proposals are stunning.

Go Edmonton! I've been waiting for Edmonton to crack 200m! Not a fan of the design but better that last proposal.
     
     
  #8828  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:50 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
If you notice in this render, in the near distance they have also included 102nd Street Centre (better known as Manulife 2) into the skyline render. It appears as the tallest building in the central core, on the right side of the pic. Interesting...

__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8829  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 3:31 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
80 Bloor is hardcore.

The Edmonton Project looks amazing.
     
     
  #8830  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 3:52 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
If you notice in this render, in the near distance they have also included 102nd Street Centre (better known as Manulife 2) into the skyline render. It appears as the tallest building in the central core, on the right side of the pic. Interesting...

Yeah, I noticed that too, was glad to see that (102nd Street Centre).
     
     
  #8831  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 4:28 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,082
Oddly enough though, ^^no arena.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8832  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 5:25 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
80 Bloor would be good mid block infill if it had the height of mid block infill. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The blank walls and the shape are unattractive for such a dominating structure. Redesign - yes.
     
     
  #8833  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 7:30 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Beautiful tower Edmonton! It'll probably get downsized but still very nice and VERY TALL!!! I'd love to see it get built as is and maybe Calgary wouldn't be so inclined to keep building twins, triplets or whatever. That building would look great along 10th Ave either on Center or First St.
     
     
  #8834  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 1:08 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,506
Beautiful proposals Now let's see some of these bad boys get an approval and start sales.
     
     
  #8835  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:45 PM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
80 Bloor is such a disappointment. They actually had an interesting design for once, then inexplicably rotated it 90 degrees to give yet another main facade of banal, rectangular balconies. Unacceptable. The old render was 1000x better.
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
     
     
  #8836  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:53 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
80 Bloor is such a disappointment. They actually had an interesting design for once, then inexplicably rotated it 90 degrees to give yet another main facade of banal, rectangular balconies. Unacceptable. The old render was 1000x better.
How does simply rotating the design suddenly make it so much worse?
     
     
  #8837  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 2:58 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Sorry, what did it look like before? I don't remember.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8838  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 3:11 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
80 Bloor is gorgeous and very much in the New York City mold.

The design is crisp and clean, best of all its tall as hell.
     
     
  #8839  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 3:15 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Sorry, what did it look like before? I don't remember.


     
     
  #8840  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 3:27 PM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
How does simply rotating the design suddenly make it so much worse?
Because the side with the curtainwall glass facing the main street makes it look like much more professional of a building, and much more clean, instead of aA condo number 42.

You can't honestly look at those renderings with a straight face and say that the balcony side will look as crisp and good on Bloor as the curtainwall side would.
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.