HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    111 West 57th Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #401  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 2:30 AM
McSky's Avatar
McSky McSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 156
The diagram of 111 W 57th looks great. But the roof height is erroneously set to 1000 feet, so the model is misplaced if a selection by roof height is made.
     
     
  #402  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 2:59 AM
Perklol's Avatar
Perklol Perklol is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,457
This will look fantastic. I am certain that Jds will get loans for this landmark.
     
     
  #403  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 6:52 AM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSky View Post
The diagram of 111 W 57th looks great. But the roof height is erroneously set to 1000 feet, so the model is misplaced if a selection by roof height is made.
I don't know who made the entry for this tower, but you're right, there is no way the roof is at 1000 feet. At a rough guess, I'd put the roof height around 1230 to 1260 feet.
     
     
  #404  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 4:43 PM
McSky's Avatar
McSky McSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
I don't know who made the entry for this tower, but you're right, there is no way the roof is at 1000 feet. At a rough guess, I'd put the roof height around 1230 to 1260 feet.
I think something was posted (maybe DOB document) that had the highest occupied floor as 1200 feet. So 1230 to 1260 is reasonable for the roof, then leading to the fins or spires at the very top.
     
     
  #405  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 7:19 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSky View Post
I think something was posted (maybe DOB document) that had the highest occupied floor as 1200 feet. So 1230 to 1260 is reasonable for the roof, then leading to the fins or spires at the very top.
The last 3 floors will be mechanical. When we get better drawings we will have a better idea of what the "roof" is.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #406  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 7:53 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
http://www.citylandnyc.org/proposed-resi...ach-on-site-of-steinway-hall/#more-20423

Proposed Residential Tower Would Encroach on Site of Steinway Hall


10/07/2013

Updated from the last hearing...


Quote:
Update (10/17/13):


On October 15, 2013, the applicant returned to Landmarks. Charkrabarti stated that the design team had listened to the Commissioners comments and found a way to build the new structure without demolishing any of the interior courtyard fabric of Steinway Hall, except for an interior shed.

The atrium would be composed of Starfire glass, which Pasquarelli said was “the clearest glass on the market,” and would allow pedestrians to see through the lobby to the retained courtyard walls. The glass would be framed by terra cotta, “bringing some of the materiality of the tower to the streetfront.”

Commissioner Fred Bland was lavish in his praise of the project, saying it “creates a new landmark.” He said the applicant’s choice to go through the Landmarks approval process was “the hard way, but the right way.”

Commissioner Michael Goldblum remarked on the small floor plate of the tower, saying that he “can’t imagine someone who can afford it wanting to live in it,” but that was outside of the commission’s purview. Goldlblum went on to say the architecture was of a high quality.

Commissioner Joan Gerner called the project “a wonderful addition to our City.”

Chair Tierney said the “totally appropriate” project represented the way in which Landmarks could facilitate “significant architecture” in the City while allowing “important growth.”

The Commissioners unanimously voted to approve the project.
I really hope they lean on Extell next week to get rid of that cantilever.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #407  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 10:33 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,076
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #408  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2013, 11:43 PM
Perklol's Avatar
Perklol Perklol is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,457
I did not realize LPC was concerned with designs of applicants. Does this mean Extell's hideous tower will be blocked by them?
     
     
  #409  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2013, 1:16 AM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,089
The LPC's main concern is design and always has been. There is good chance that they reject Extell's petition for the cantilever.
     
     
  #410  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2013, 5:12 PM
CCs77 CCs77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
It would be could that when somebody goes to that exhibit, takes detailed pictuers of those drawings with the accompanying text, mainly the one on the right, the structural concept. Unfortunately in this picture we can read the details.
     
     
  #411  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2013, 9:34 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,076
^ I'll get it myself if nobody else does.


Some of the earlier plans for the tower and restoration of Steinway Hall approved by CB5, which have since been altered for LPC approval...


http://www.cb5.org/cb5/resolutions/september_2/#109-113_west_57th_street_steinway


Quote:
.....WHEREAS, JDS Development Group, Steinway Hall's current owners are proposing to perform the following list of restorative work and alterations to the existing building:

•To clean the masonry cladding and architectural elements, and to repoint the stone and brick within the West 57th Street and West 58th Street facades.

•To remove existing brick at the eastern wall of the West 57th Street façade and to replace this with Indiana Limestone cladding and cornice to match the southern façade wall

•To create new window openings on the fourth story at the eastern wall and to install windows matching those at the fifth story and above.

•To perform a restoration of the copper roof capping the penthouse story.

•To remove two existing metal roll-down doors at the West 58th Street loading docks, and to replace these with solid wood garage doors, matching the panel detailing of the doors at "109 West 57th Street".

•To remove one metal pedestrian door at the West 58th Street loading docks, and to replace this with a dold wood door, matching the panel detailing of the doors at "109 West 57th Street".

•To restore one existing pedestrian door at the West 58th Street loading docks.

•To remove the existing brick recess in the mechanical/tank tower arches, and to replace these with glass windows.

•To perform a restoration of the copper roof capping the mechanical/tank tower.

•To remove the rear yard low rise storage building; and

WHEREAS, The applicant also proposes to penetrate through the eastern wall in order to create a new plate glass paneled entrance into Steinway & Sons Reception Room rotunda, thus removing a portion of an existing plaster interior wall; and

WHEREAS, The design of the proposed new plate glass paneled entrance is based largely upon the details of the glass paneled window at the western wall of the rotunda; and

WHEREAS, The proposed new eastern entrance into the rotunda is to follow the profile of existing pilasters, architrave and archway, and the existing roundel will be mounted inside the new glass paneling; and

WHEREAS, The proposed new eastern entrance would connect Steinway & Sons Reception Room's rotunda to the proposed new building at the adjacent site; and

WHEREAS, The proposed new building would have approximately 43'-0" of West 57th Street frontage adjacent to Steinway Hall; and

WHEREAS, As of right, one could develop a building on the adjacent site which would rise twelve stories above West 57th Street before requiring a setback, the proposed new building would have a glass façade rising only six stories to approximately 85'-0", in which an atrium space would be enclosed; and

WHEREAS, There would be a 57'-0"deep setback above the atrium space in which a Summer Garden is proposed to be placed, and from which the proposed new tower would rise; and

WHEREAS, The proposed new tower would have a glass façade, with numerous feathered set backs on the southern wall and a façade of glass, glazed terracotta and bronze on the other walls, which will rise to approximately 1,300 feet; and

WHEREAS, The proposed restorative work on the exterior of Steinway Hall is substantial, the proposed changes at West 58th Street would serve as embellishment, and the proposed changes at the mechanical/tank tower appear to be minimal; and

WHEREAS, Since, historically, this was outside of public view, removal of the rear yard two story low rise building would not have a negative impact upon the views of Landmark Steinway Hall; and

WHEREAS, The proposed modification which might have the most impact is the creation of a new eastern entrance to Steinway & Sons Reception Room rotunda, this would take cues from existing architectural elements, namely the glass paneled window at the western wall of the rotunda, and this new entrance will be harmonious with the Landmark interior; and

WHEREAS, The proposed new atrium and tower's glass materiality and massing would not obscure the style, materials, setbacks and massing of Steinway Hall, whose picturesque towers and decorative elements make it a monumental presence along West 57th Street; therefore, be it

RESOLVED, Community Board Five recommends approval of the application to perform exterior alterations to Steinway Hall, 109-113 West 57th Street, to perform interior alterations to create a new entrance to Steinway & Sons Reception Room.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.

Last edited by NYguy; Oct 19, 2013 at 10:18 PM.
     
     
  #412  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 5:46 PM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 937
Woah, and people think 432 Park is skinny.
     
     
  #413  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 5:48 PM
Submariner's Avatar
Submariner Submariner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
The last 3 floors will be mechanical. When we get better drawings we will have a better idea of what the "roof" is.



Does anyone have a high resolution picture of this? Perhaps with 432 Park included?
     
     
  #414  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 11:43 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
The Greatest Irony

An immaculate Steinway in the lobby of AS+GG's office, as the 111 proposal has taken the cake from 225 W 57th..


     
     
  #415  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 11:56 PM
CCs77 CCs77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSky View Post
I think something was posted (maybe DOB document) that had the highest occupied floor as 1200 feet. So 1230 to 1260 is reasonable for the roof, then leading to the fins or spires at the very top.
Scaling the drawing at the exhibit, which is what we have for now, apparently, if the total height of the building is 1350ft / 411 m. it seems that the roof will be about 1115 ft. / 340 m. with the crown being about 235 ft. / 71 m tall. assuming that the top three floors are mechanichal, the roof of the last occupied floor would be about 1075 ft. / 327 m.
The drawing is blurry so I can't read the texts to confirm that the assumptions I made are true, but looking at the drawing is what is seems

     
     
  #416  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2013, 5:15 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCs77 View Post
Scaling the drawing at the exhibit, which is what we have for now, apparently, if the total height of the building is 1350ft / 411 m. it seems that the roof will be about 1115 ft. / 340 m. with the crown being about 235 ft. / 71 m tall. assuming that the top three floors are mechanichal, the roof of the last occupied floor would be about 1075 ft. / 327 m.

According to the permit on file, 1,200 ft seems to be the highest occupied spaces in the tower. I'm guessing it's about 1,300 ft minus the glass "spires" on top. That would give about 100 ft of mechanical space.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #417  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2013, 5:06 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,076
( October 21, 2013 )

Steinway Hall awaits its makeover...






__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #418  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2013, 5:32 AM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
^
I love the proximity of this and One 57. It's definitely going to be a cozy street. "Hey honey, were going over to neighbor's for dinner tonight..."
     
     
  #419  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2013, 12:05 AM
King DenCity's Avatar
King DenCity King DenCity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: With Your Pancakes :|
Posts: 507
With all these towers I'm gonna call 57th st "Tall St". The number of projects is amazing!
__________________
Pancakes are as they should be and that is life.
Let the man made forests rule!
     
     
  #420  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2013, 2:49 AM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 937
The way that this and One57 pay homage to the old New York setback towers is awesome.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:10 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.