HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 2:46 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoTrans View Post
if not for the NCC, the route would follow the curving Ottawa River Parkway causing more squeal, more maintenance to rail and LRT's and possibly slower speeds;
If not for the NCC, the Ottawa River Car Path would have been studied and rejected anyway, but without the added costs, annoyance, and political capital spent satisfying the NCC.

I am sure the NCC was ever so concerned about rail maintenance and travel speeds.

Quote:
the NCC has no money unless the Federal Govt. gives them some so maybe the blame needs to be re-directed to the government itself.
Good. The less money the NCC has, the fewer stupid NCC ideas the stupid NCC can NCC.

Abolish the NCC.
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 4:45 PM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
If not for the NCC, the Ottawa River Car Path would have been studied and rejected anyway, but without the added costs, annoyance, and political capital spent satisfying the NCC.

I am sure the NCC was ever so concerned about rail maintenance and travel speeds.



Good. The less money the NCC has, the fewer stupid NCC ideas the stupid NCC can NCC.

Abolish the NCC.
Don't sugar coat it, tell us how you really feel about the NCC...
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2013, 6:08 PM
DowntownDensity DowntownDensity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
I'm curious if the integration of the Lyon LRT stop into the Place de Ville complex has/will have an impact on the proposed development of the new office tower to replace the four-storey podium?

http://www.ottawalightrail.ca/en/the-build/lyon/overview/
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2013, 11:52 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,674
Light rail project gets another temp in charge

Deputy city manager takes ‘interim’ control of implementation office

By Joanne Chianello, OTTAWA CITIZEN October 22, 2013


You’d think that if there were one file the city would be sure to keep on top of, it’d be light rail.

After all, with a $2.1-billion price tag, the much ballyhooed Confederation Line is the largest infrastructure project in Ottawa’s history. So it’s only natural that to think the city would make sure that, if nothing else, the Light Rail Implementation Office is running smoothly.

You’d think that. But you’d be wrong.

After eight months with no permanent leader, deputy city manager Nancy Schepers is taking over the day-to-day responsibilities of the light rail implementation office after the acting director refused to do the job any more.

Schepers, who’s in charge of transportation, infrastructure and planning, doesn’t exactly have a lot of time on her hands. So what’s she doing taking on this huge job?

That explanation is, like so much else at the city, somewhat opaque. But the mismanagement of this key position at the city is undeniable.

Here’s what happened.

Back in February, then-director John Jensen left the city for a job at that well-oiled machine Metrolinx, the provincial agency that brought you the high-performing Presto card. The city then named well-respected city engineer Gary Craig as acting director of the rail office.

It’s uncertain whether Craig ever wanted the top job, but it’s clear that lately he did not. Last week, the Citizen has learned, he demanded to be returned to his former position as chief of light rail design and construction, a position that does not appear to have been filled while Craig was acting director.

Late afternoon Tuesday, Schepers sent a memo to Mayor Jim Watson and members of council informing them of Craig’s decision to return to his old job.

“In the meantime and until such a time as a new Director is hired,” wrote Schepers, “I will be assuming the day to day responsibility of the Office.”

In the meantime? What on earth has the city been doing for the past eight months? Obviously not looking for a permanent, full-time director of the office handling the city’s most important file.

Even if Craig was interested in throwing his hat into the ring for the job on a permanent basis — and all reports are to the contrary — the city should have been conducting a search for a director of the light-rail implementation office since February, whether it included Craig or not. City officials have not indicated whether that’s been the case, but obviously no one is immediately available as Schepers is stepping into the role.

Which is ridiculous.

Schepers has had an exceptionally full plate this fall and, frankly, a number of her files aren’t going so well, first-and-foremost among them the mess that is the much-delayed Airport Parkway pedestrian bridge. Although the delays might have been caused by faulty concrete and alleged issues with the bridge’s design, the city’s management on this file is highly questionable.

Schepers is also the lead city official on the new transportation master plan and the official plan — two key city documents that are up for debate over the next few months at committees and council. And for fun, throw the 2014 budget into the mix for items on this fall’s agenda.

Does she really have time to oversee the daily operations of the light-rail implementation office? And doesn’t this size of project deserve someone who is giving it her full-time attention?

That Craig is going back to the job that he loves — and, by all accounts, is great at — is wonderful. Good for him. But that the city’s management didn’t make finding a permanent director a priority is highly worrying.

If this is how city managers deal with staffing the city’s most expensive, most important infrastructure project in our history, is it any wonder that they can’t get a bridge built on time?

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/...teps+down+deputy+city/9068187/story.html
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2013, 3:49 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,810
I have noticed that most everything of late seems to fall on the shoulders of Kirkpatrick and Schepers, after cleaning house of managers a couple of years ago. It is popular these days to cut budgets on the shoulders of management, but it is possible to cut too much resulting in inadequate supervision. Is this part of the problem that we are seeing with project delays?
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2013, 4:03 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
You can be an arterial an a residential street.
That is not good planning and with one arterial (Bank Street) already cutting through the middle of the community already, I guarantee you that creating another arterial will result in a backlash. Remember the controversy of the Albion Lester intersection closure of 10 years ago. That was very divisive even within the Blossom Park community. This would be 10 times worse and would destroy the property value of every house facing Albion Road.
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2013, 10:25 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,255
from the 2014 draft budget

     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2013, 11:42 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,674
Some outstanding photography by gmarshall, originally posted in the Recent ottawa construction aerials thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmarshall View Post
Construction on the rail line expansion project:



     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2013, 4:02 PM
BenTheGreat97's Avatar
BenTheGreat97 BenTheGreat97 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Some outstanding photography by gmarshall, originally posted in the Recent ottawa construction aerials thread:
Alright, are these the entrances for the tunnel boring machines, or will these be the new stations?
__________________
Check out my Flickr photostream!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photosbybensenior/
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2013, 11:04 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenTheGreat97 View Post
Alright, are these the entrances for the tunnel boring machines, or will these be the new stations?
Those are entry points for the machines.
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2013, 11:17 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Only the machines aren't TBMs, because they're mining the tunnel; if you scroll back a couple of pages in the thread, you can see a map of the tunneling plan and pictures of one of the mining machines.
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2013, 11:32 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 29,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenTheGreat97 View Post
Alright, are these the entrances for the tunnel boring machines, or will these be the new stations?
What Capital Shaun and McC said.

Here is the Machine/Tunneling plan mentioned, from the Ottawa Citizen a few weeks back.

The first picture is the entry point on the left of the diagram, the second is the central shaft.



http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/ottawa...ly+noticeable+outside/9027502/story.html
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 12:18 AM
MountainView MountainView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,184
And if anyone wants to see what the tunnel machines look like there is one parked along the fence and the Lebreton transitway station. Very visible from the bus. They surprisingly look small in person.
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 4:16 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
That is not good planning and with one arterial (Bank Street) already cutting through the middle of the community already, I guarantee you that creating another arterial will result in a backlash. Remember the controversy of the Albion Lester intersection closure of 10 years ago. That was very divisive even within the Blossom Park community. This would be 10 times worse and would destroy the property value of every house facing Albion Road.
I'm not creating anything. Albion is already a lesser arterial.
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 2:48 PM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Some more photos from Transit Ottawa:

This is the first I've seen of the eastern portal:


See the rest at:

Construction update: Downtown tunnel portals, Oct. 2013
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 4:31 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,666
That ramp appears to be roughly 125 metres in length. At a grade of 5%, that puts the rails about six metres down when the train enter the tunnel. Assuming that the tunnel will have an internal height of about five metres, this leaves about a metre of overburden at the eastern portal; including any support structure. Perhaps more importantly, there will only be about two-and-a-half metres of overburden when the tunnel reaches Laurier Avenue; again, including any support structure. Coincidently, two-and-a-half metres is approximately the depth of the sewer under Laurier.

Starting at the Transitway ‘Kink’, as they appear to have done, a 5% grade would take them to the depth of about seven-and-a-half metres by the time they get to Laurier. They would be just starting to remove rock from the bottom of the tunnel. That means that the tunnel’s overburden from the portal, and continuing under Laurier, is loose material and will need to be supported quickly. I am curious to see how this will work out.
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 4:47 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,696
Nice to see this progress relatively quickly. Are there any rewards for the consortium for finishing ahead of schedule? I would imagine they would get paid earlier, which counts for a bit when financing is involved.

A better question is, would OC Transpo be ready with system changes if say the LRT is finished early?
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 9:01 PM
BenTheGreat97's Avatar
BenTheGreat97 BenTheGreat97 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
A better question is, would OC Transpo be ready with system changes if say the LRT is finished early?
Whoa there, I wouldn't get too excited. Construction deadlines aren't really that well respected, even if it needs to be ready for a major event (Canada's 150th). Although it would be great if it were completed ahead of schedule, I think it would be opened either just on time or slightly after.
__________________
Check out my Flickr photostream!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photosbybensenior/
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2013, 9:50 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenTheGreat97 View Post
Whoa there, I wouldn't get too excited. Construction deadlines aren't really that well respected, even if it needs to be ready for a major event (Canada's 150th). Although it would be great if it were completed ahead of schedule, I think it would be opened either just on time or slightly after.
Well, Vancouver's Canada Line opened almost four months ahead of schedule, and the contracting is similar.

This is the advantage of having the private sector in charge of the entire thing (including interim financing) is that if there are efficiencies, whether it's time, process or money, they are usually implemented. Look at how fast Lansdowne is going compared to the city-managed Airport Parkway pedestrian bridge.

It was mentioned that the road headers can mine about 3 metres of the tunnel a day. Between three of them, that's 9 metres a day. Divide up 2.5 kilometres, that's about 278 days. They've budgeted two years, with construction at Parliament Station slated to begin in April of 2016. There's a lot of contingency there.

Last edited by Kitchissippi; Oct 28, 2013 at 10:08 PM.
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2013, 7:40 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,666
Kitchissipps, it sounds as if you are under the impression that the tunneling is on the critical path of the project’s timing; I have been told that it is not. That is one of the reasons the consortium was free to choose a slower (and less expensive) method of tunneling. There are many, many components with in this project; mining the tunnel is only one of them.

For example; the additional lanes on the 417 need to be finished before the buses can be removed from the Transitway. Until the buses are off the Transitway, the conversion to rail can not take place. It is probably more cost effective to lay the tracks all at once, but if that is not going to happen for a while, then there is no hurry to get the tracks laid through the tunnel, so what would be the point of paying extra to finish the tunnel earlier?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:11 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.