HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8241  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 3:29 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
This is great! But as a new tallest for Edmonton? I dont like that idea.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8242  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 3:40 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8243  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 3:53 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is online now
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
This is great! But as a new tallest for Edmonton? I dont like that idea.
Strange thing to say.

I love it. And encourage Edmonton to build it!


Everytime I visit Edmonton I'm blown away by their skyline. Dense, long and full of colours. Very modern, and very PoMo.

And now it's going to become very interesting.

Last edited by Rico Rommheim; Oct 3, 2013 at 4:43 PM.
     
     
  #8244  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 4:29 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
Edmonton is rockin today

Kelly Ramsey office/retail - u/c


(http://s15.postimg.org/62c3hs0mz/photo.jpg)
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8245  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 4:35 PM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Wow.....
     
     
  #8246  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 4:52 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Strange thing to say.

I love it. And encourage Edmonton to build it!


Everytime I visit Edmonton I'm blown away by their skyline. Dense, long and full of colours. Very modern, and very PoMo.

And now it's going to become very interesting.
I don't know how that could be construed as a strange thing to say. Edmonton should aspire to build a nice building as its first tower over 150 meters, not a plain condo with a red stripe. It's a decent/nice condo, but certainly not "tallest icon" material.


That new render of KR is great! It's going to be a great addition to the core, right next to the current tallest too! I'll take a photo update when I'm there this weekend.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8247  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 7:27 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Love 9955 but that red condo thing is just awful at that height. Edmonton deserves much better for a landmark building.

Height for the sake of height isn't worth it in the long run.
     
     
  #8248  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 7:30 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
^given who is behind it... I suspect we won't see it anytime soon, mind you there have been rumours of a redesign.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8249  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 7:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8250  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 7:43 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,185
Wow. Go Edmonton! It's starting to feel painful right now with the lack of new renderings for Calgary.
     
     
  #8251  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 7:46 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Now now! Everyone gets a turn It almost seems like developers between the cities of the country almost formulate when to release renders; One city has a spurt of releases, then a week or two later another city does, and so on. Keeps things interesting
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8252  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 9:21 PM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
     
     
  #8253  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 9:58 PM
Doug_Cgy Doug_Cgy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,142
Does anyone know how tall the "Edmontonian" is in metres? Looks TALL!
     
     
  #8254  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 10:24 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
Has to be in and around the 200m mark.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8255  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 11:20 PM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,085
Edmonton wouldn't be seeing renderings like the new Edmontonian if we hadn't shut down the municipal airport. I expect to see more proposals for tall buildings in the future.
     
     
  #8256  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2013, 2:51 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
It appears that 21 Dundas Square is being built without having even gone into sales:



By: androiduk at Urban Toronto



http://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/21-dundas-square
     
     
  #8257  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2013, 2:56 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
That is a bad idea, isn't it? Either way, still cool! More towers around Yonge and Dundas Square is always a good thing in my books!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8258  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2013, 2:57 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeIsThomas View Post
Wow that looks like it could be the senate chamber for a small country! Very nice!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8259  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2013, 9:55 PM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
I like the top 50% or so of this tower, but the podium looks too boxy and tacked on to me. I think they need to relate it more to the section above, create a better transition from box to cylinder. It might also help if they carried that textured cladding that is on the podium up those beige walls above.

I'm no architect but something about that podium just looks awkward. Other than that I like the height, the red elements, and the cladding material on the podium. I would agree with some others here that for a signature tower (height-wise) it should have a much better design overall. It's far from iconic.
     
     
  #8260  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2013, 10:41 PM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
So it looks like there will be 3 proposals in Edmonton going for 'new tallest' in the next couple of years

office
condo
mixed use
Are all of these essentially guaranteed to be taller than the current tallest? Would be impressive to have a new tallest top 3. Lots to look forward to in Edmonton the next few years.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:55 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.