HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1221  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:22 PM
nycaddict's Avatar
nycaddict nycaddict is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
No great shape with curves though definitely a great Tower
thanks for the info. any pictures?
     
     
  #1222  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:25 PM
tyleraf's Avatar
tyleraf tyleraf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 566
Please upload pics! I'm glad to hear its over 1400. This will be a perfect book end to the Central Park south skyline.
     
     
  #1223  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:32 PM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
1,423 feet? Not bad at all, we'll take that! 225 W 57th Street would still be the tallest to roof in the city!
     
     
  #1224  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:34 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,012
I'm just hoping it's not a flat roof.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1225  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:39 PM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
I'm just hoping it's not a flat roof.
Would be better than another spire...
     
     
  #1226  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:42 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post
Would be better than another spire...
I doubt this would have one, but I think we need another spire, a real spire to top the skyline. The flat topped 432 Park is enough of that.

I think these 3 towers are close enough to be seen as a trinity, they'll work together as a group. The first two give us nice, distinctive marks on the skyline above a sea of boxes.
I think the tallest towers should.


__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1227  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:49 PM
Blaze23 Blaze23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 214
This is crazy! I can't believe all this happened since the last time i logged on. I would've went to that meeting. Guess it wouldn't let the Steinway tower have its day lol. This has to be one of the most exciting days on this forum! By the way I'm with NYGuy when it comes to the spire, if u wanna be in the conversation with the ESB and the Chryslers as the next big thing in NYC, you need yourself a spire.
     
     
  #1228  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:50 PM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
I think these 3 towers are close enough to be seen as a trinity, they'll work together as a group. The first two give us nice, distinctive marks on the skyline above a sea of boxes.
I think the tallest towers should.
Well, I totally think your right about that. All three towers are going to make a killer combo. I hope developers purpose a few more glass supertalls closer to 432 Park, on the other side of Central Park. It would be cool to have a wall of supertalls 1,000-1,500 feet all along there(all different and unique designs, of course.)
     
     
  #1229  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:50 PM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Flat top sorry guys
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
  #1230  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:51 PM
-Filipe-'s Avatar
-Filipe- -Filipe- is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
Flat top sorry guys
pictures?
__________________
I LOVE NY!
     
     
  #1231  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2013, 11:52 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
Flat top sorry guys
OH well. So the two tallest towers to roof in Manhattan will be flat topped. Let's hope the design is enough to overlook that.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1232  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:00 AM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
Look at it this way. One57 and 111 are flat looking north/south.
     
     
  #1233  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:07 AM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
I can't imagine Adrian Smith screwing it up, so I'm not worried with a flat top. He'll make it work to it's advantage.
     
     
  #1234  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:08 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayPro View Post
Look at it this way. One57 and 111 are flat looking north/south.
Sure, if you're standing directly north. I rarely see skyscrapers that way. And from the south they aren't flat looking at all.

Overall the important thing is that this tower is moving forward, and should be under construction within a matter of months. There's a lot to digest with all of the skyscrapers in the works. It should keep us busy for the next few years, to a decade or so as other towers kick off after these near final stages of construction.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1235  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:10 AM
UTEPman UTEPman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 240
I haven't seen a render yet, but the descriptions are paving the way for another interpretation of a box. The height is nice, but won't be noticeably taller than 432 park.


With all the talk about huge heights and iconic design, I'm thinking this may be disappointing for someone like me who had really high expectations.

So far, I'm thinking that 107 & 111 is going to be the iconic tower of central park. It won't be a great deal shorter than this tower so it should stand out nicely.
     
     
  #1236  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:13 AM
Blaze23 Blaze23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 214
I might be reading too much into it but I'm not sensing a lot of enthusiasm from those guys at the meeting. Hope I'm wrong
     
     
  #1237  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:14 AM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
So I'd guess that if one were to eyeball 225's height on the renders of 111 here, it would prolly hit the top of the pic.
     
     
  #1238  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:16 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayPro View Post
So I'd guess that if one were to eyeball 225's height on the renders of 111 here, it would prolly hit the top of the pic.
Not quite. We're talking about a 73 ft height difference . They'll likely be rising together, but I believe 111 will top out first. It will be exciting to watch and document this.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1239  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:17 AM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaze23 View Post
I might be reading too much into it but I'm not sensing a lot of enthusiasm from those guys at the meeting. Hope I'm wrong
If anything, what might be construed as a lack of enthusiasm could be either guarded optimism or having to sit through any buttpipe NIMBY claptrap during the meeting. Both guesses IMO are equally valid.
     
     
  #1240  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:19 AM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
@NYGuy;

But wasn't 111's height finalized at 1300' to the top design element? That'd be a 123' diff.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:38 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.