Quote:
Originally Posted by alecz_dad
Jam-Pho, what's that in your sig? "name calling is what they do when good arguments can't be found - don't sink to their level." Maybe you had better follow you own advice and keep your arguments sharp, and your snipes to yourself.
|
Yeah, now I KNOW you're John Martin. Trying to abbreviate my username in a playground-level insult attempt is typical of him/you.
As for the Franky quote, you don't know the whole story. He was a lot like you; ignorant, and refused to see other people's perspectives, let alone acknowledge that they had a point, and often failed to answer their questions. The quote from him is quoted for the sheer irony of that statement coming from him.
Additionally, I'm not insulting you. I'm merely speaking out loud about what I am objectively observing. It's part of the scientific method.
Quote:
|
Anyhoo, thank goodness now I'll have a Rexall - so much different from the 3 Shoppers' nearby. Hip hip hooray! Callooh callay! And I think the neighbourhood could survive without a BMO branch.
|
Yes, completely ignore the merits of such a thing for people in your own neighbourhood! As we all know, it's clearly all about YOU.
Quote:
BTW, you should be more careful to do your research too. Despite the article's assertion that there is no TD bank in the Glebe, there is, at the Isabella Loblaws. There's also one just over the bridge in Old Ottawa South. I'm frankly surprised they would open another branch when there are 2 others nearby.
|
"Subject is incapable of comprehensive reading and picking up on inferred information."
If you even bothered to read the full article (I'm hoping you did, but hope rarely gets me anywhere in this forum), you could see that the writer was inferring that there was no TD on Bank Street, which is true.
Furthermore, you are not qualified to determine whether a locations merits something or not. These are businesses that try and grow themselves. If TD is willing and wanting to put another TD in the Glebe area, then it means they've done some research and found it to be a sound business venture.
Quote:
|
As for being "fair and non-partisan" (sic, I think you meant to say "impartial") apart from a few posters here I can't say that I've noticed much impartiality on display here (least of all from you). As much as I may keep futilely flinging criticism, there seems scant willingness among the Lansdowne-huggers to seriously consider the concerns raised by the critics.
|
No, I meant non-partisan. I thought you'd be able to understand that given your "us vs. them" glasses you see this development through. Also, you've even implied political and legal meddling in the past, so I figured it was appropriate. I guess I need more lessons before I can say I am able to speak "John Martinese".
Hey everybody! Have I been impartial, or is "aleczdad" right for once with regards to one of his claims? And John, your "criticism" is often unfounded or invalidated by myself and others; you just refuse to accept or acknowledge it.