HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4261  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 9:58 PM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
It'd be nice if I could copy and paste the text from these documents. Oh well.



Their showcase building that stands out from the crowd will be clad with mostly metal panels with some brick accents, just like a thousand other designs out there. The future of architecture in Vancouver looks pretty hopeless when the developer considers metal cladding a high end building material.

On the positive side, there's some pretty good density coming to the area, and this development will solidify SEFC as a true neighborhood. I presume there will be retail along Quebec?

Really? Metal-clad buildings are bad? You would be singing a totally different tune if they were these:

The Petronas Twin Towers (photo below)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4262  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 10:01 PM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4263  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 10:16 PM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
I like the Concert proposal... it complements the area really well.
Overall, the concept is good. The only thing I don't like about it is that it doesn't have any retail. It would be nice to have a mini plaza-type covered mall with indoor and street retail along the north side of the development along First Avenue to create a continuity of retail from the Main Street area to the Olympic Village retail centre where Urban Fare and London Drugs are housed. Mario's Gelato side is already retail, so I don't see any reason why they don't want to include retail on the south side of First Avenue.

Also on top of a retail podium, the tower could go up higher (like 30 stories and tastefully clad in metal) to complement Opsal nearby, thereby creating a landmark 'gateway' to the Olympic Village.

Does my wish sound too far-fetched?

http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...51quebec/documents/rezoningrationale.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4264  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 10:35 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post

I presume there will be retail along Quebec?
Skimming through the material, I didn't see any plans for retail along Quebec, with the exception of a possible hot beverage kiosk (using an old interurban rail car) on a plaza on the northwest corner of Quebec & 1st.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4265  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 10:41 PM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Doesn't make sense to have a future tram system serving only co-op housing and townhomes along Quebec and 1st, if that would ever materialize.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4266  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 11:22 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 24,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Doesn't make sense to have a future tram system serving only co-op housing and townhomes along Quebec and 1st, if that would ever materialize.
??? I think the picture of the tram implies the buildout of the Vancouver streetcar that goes from Granville Island to Stanley Park, and potentially beyond.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4267  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 11:42 PM
Kapten Kapten is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Really? Metal-clad buildings are bad? You would be singing a totally different tune if they were these:

The Petronas Twin Towers (photo below)
Hard to believe that the same architect did the Sears on Granville (Cesar Pelli)...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4268  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 11:51 PM
rsxstock rsxstock is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Overall, the concept is good. The only thing I don't like about it is that it doesn't have any retail. It would be nice to have a mini plaza-type covered mall with indoor and street retail along the north side of the development along First Avenue to create a continuity of retail from the Main Street area to the Olympic Village retail centre where Urban Fare and London Drugs are housed. Mario's Gelato side is already retail, so I don't see any reason why they don't want to include retail on the south side of First Avenue.

Also on top of a retail podium, the tower could go up higher (like 30 stories and tastefully clad in metal) to complement Opsal nearby, thereby creating a landmark 'gateway' to the Olympic Village.

Does my wish sound too far-fetched?

http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...51quebec/documents/rezoningrationale.pdf
i agree, a mini plaza would complement the existing "rest area" by science world really well
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4269  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 1:07 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Here's the boards (finally) for the Concert proposal on the old Translink property. I think it's pretty well thought out and will make a huge impact on the whole area, the current dead space just — energy from SEFC.

•Rezoning Rationale (16.7mb)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...51quebec/documents/rezoningrationale.pdf

•Urban Context (3.2mb)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...ns/1551quebec/documents/urbancontext.pdf

•Design Principles (143mb)????????!!!!!
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...551quebec/documents/designprinciples.pdf

•Open Space (5.52mb)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...tions/1551quebec/documents/openspace.pdf

•Form of Development (58.2mb)???????
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...51quebec/documents/formofdevelopment.pdf

•Sustainability (7.63mb)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan.../1551quebec/documents/sustainability.pdf

•Project Data (960kb)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...ons/1551quebec/documents/projectdata.pdf

•Appendix (1.21mb)
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...ations/1551quebec/documents/appendix.pdf

Please note the above files are absolutely monsterous and there is no reason the city needed to keep them this size. They are doing a disservice to the public as many people just won't be bothered to look at them like this.
I love the new plans, and can't wait to see them built.

I was interested to see the heights planned for the empty lot + mcdonalds lots at south west corner of Main and Terminal. 9 building heights from 3-23 storeys in height. I can't wait to see what becomes of that also. This was from page 7 of the Urban Context pdf.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4270  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 2:37 AM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapten View Post
Hard to believe that the same architect did the Sears on Granville (Cesar Pelli)...
I guess people's tastes do get refined with time, and that includes architects too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4271  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 2:43 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Well there's probably a limit to how much retail the area can support. At least stick some token retail near the water/main walkway. Or leave aside some space that could be built up in the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4272  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 4:15 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Here's the boards (finally) for the Concert proposal on the old Translink property. I think it's pretty well thought out and will make a huge impact on the whole area, the current dead space just — energy from SEFC.
Not a single square foot of commercial in 600,000 square feet of development?! At the very least the entire section fronting the seawall should be commercial units (restaurants!!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4273  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 5:22 AM
rsxstock rsxstock is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 274
would be nice if they add a bike rental there since it is a nice path around the whole area
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4274  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 6:06 AM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by spm2013 View Post
Well there's probably a limit to how much retail the area can support. At least stick some token retail near the water/main walkway. Or leave aside some space that could be built up in the future.
The area would have a huge demand for retail in the next few years when all the condos are completed in the vicinity. The only reason why the retail sector was so slow to take root initially in the Olympic village area was because of a lack of residents moving in due to insane condo prices in the city-built development. However, my understanding of the latter phase condos built by other developers is that they are selling relatively well, meaning there would definitely be way more people moving there in the near future.

The area is served by an inter city train and bus terminal, and a sky train station nearby, and coupled with the tram system and new UBC sky train line planned for the future, would create an excellent node for a retail/commercial centre for that neighbourhood. In fact, a multi-storied mall, hotels or even office towers should be in the works as well, before too many residents move in and nimbyism takes root. But then again I am ahead of myself here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4275  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 6:17 AM
Vin Vin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
Not a single square foot of commercial in 600,000 square feet of development?! At the very least the entire section fronting the seawall should be commercial units (restaurants!!)
I agree! Too much wasted waterfront space for housing only. If Vancouverites have seen the new waterfront development of South-bank by the Yarra River in Melbourne, they would be awed by how people there could make a former warehouse district become so vibrant with a world-class casino, alfresco-style waterfront dining, and new condos, offices and hotels, with the Eureka tower reaching 88 stories in height, essentially creating two sets of skyscrapers on either side of the river. Vancouver City limitations, a refusal to think outside the box and nimbyism truly bog us down here.

Last edited by Vin; Sep 14, 2013 at 6:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4276  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 3:57 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,626
Well, a casino and indoor malls would be the last things I'd want to see in SEFC. But I do agree ground floor retail should be present, even just 'nail salons and A&Ws' I am a big believer of the 'Eyes on the street' concept as much as I am of neighbourhood retail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4277  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 5:50 PM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 853
it's truly nuts not to include a large amount of commercial in a project of that size in that location, not only to bridge main st to olympic village and olympic village to city gate, but because of the potentially enormous local and destination demand, the proximity to skytrain, the location at a major crossroads in the center of vancouver, the traffic calming function of retail vis-a-vis mostly inactive residential uses, increased safety and neighborhood integrity, livening up that strip on quebec st or the waterfront or both so that it's not a through area, supporting existing area retailers by diversification and destination-building, and the simple fact that adding more commercial spaces is great in a city where the high cost of commercial space in the core is leading to an increasingly generic and chain-dominated retail scene.

planning, don't blow this one!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4278  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2013, 12:34 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,767
Obviously, I'm in agreement with everyone here regarding the complete lack of retail within a 600,000sqft. development. It should be 'patio city' along this waterfront development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4279  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2013, 4:38 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
What was that property used for before Concord bought it from Translink?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4280  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2013, 5:11 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
It should be 'patio city' along this waterfront development.
Exactly. The current patios seem to be always full and the location offers world-class views, so not including restaurants and patios is quite a miss!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:11 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.