HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 8:49 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Its not so easy for Expo line now since this "service optimization" thing.

In fact, we don't even have enough train to increase Expo capacity, as the spare ratio is already so low compared to other cities. So even if TransLink called BCRTC, they'll say "we don't have enough trains"
Well...duh...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico View Post
I know the Canada Line has a capacity greater than what exists today, but....those are some mighty long single track sections in Richmond and the Airport, plus the turn around at Waterfront.
One thing that does bug me with the Evergreen Line though is why do they need a double track at Douglas - Lafarge station, including the tail track? Why can't it be single track like the end of the Airport or Richmond?

I just couldn't imagine extending Evergreen Line towards Westwood Plateau, and if is to be extended, its going to be from Coquitlam Central anyway. So having the station and/or tail track be single does make sense, and it would also look nicer for something that will truly be the end of the line.

My biggest fear is the tail track of Evergreen would look similar to the King George Station tail track, which is ugly and makes it so incomplete (of course, for King George, it should really be extended further).
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:55 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.