Quote:
Originally Posted by jhsv
Am not the biggest fan of bridge street but not wanting it to fail either. Not really sure the lake was that big a draw and they did seem to have alot of issues with it leaking. Once stores started leaving Madison Square it was only a matter of time before one of the department stores made the move to Bridge Street. Maybe a lot should have been left for a department store in the original plan while keeping some of the water feature. The main problem it seems with Bridge Street businesses are the restaurants- while a few have done well others have not lasted long at all. Some of the buildings have had 3 restaurants in the few years the place has been open.
|
I don't think the absence of the lake will be such a detriment to Bridge Street. I
do think that portion was the most scenic, however. I think what many people are upset about is that what is replacing that portion of the lake isn't what it could have been. The renderings of what will replace it look
OK, but compared to what used to be there, it isn't even close. A landscaped, creekside pedestrian-way would have been so much better.
Either way, I don't think removing the lake will end Bridge Street; I don't think much could. Bridge Street won't die by any means... any speak about its death is much ado about nothing. If the place was in such awful danger of decline, Belk would have pulled out long ago (the new construction of their 2 story store was announced over a year ago).
Bridge Street has had a bit of trouble retaining a
few headline occupants, but all that says is that the center hasn't completely nestled into its niche; that's the case with any large scale retail center in a rapidly growing area.
If you're writing off Bridge Street because occupancy is constantly changing, you really don't understand what is going on in the Tennessee Valley.