HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5621  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 1:00 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Thanks for the pics!
     
     
  #5622  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 2:11 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Thanks so much Elysia17! The photos are quite clear and beautiful too! Nicely done and I hope you post some more as progress continues!
     
     
  #5623  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 2:42 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,423
I have no job so I can be the official photographer. Just one limitation can't walk far so 100m from bus stops or places I can sit. Just give me an exact location am I will go out and take the photos.
     
     
  #5624  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 4:29 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Is/was there not a normal SkyTrain column beside the transition structure? I remember seeing the forms for it many weeks ago...
     
     
  #5625  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 5:47 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
I have no job so I can be the official photographer. Just one limitation can't walk far so 100m from bus stops or places I can sit. Just give me an exact location am I will go out and take the photos.
Thanks for the offer! I'd wait a few weeks until we can see a bit more progress before making the trip all the way out there, though.
     
     
  #5626  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 7:28 AM
Elysia17 Elysia17 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
Is/was there not a normal SkyTrain column beside the transition structure? I remember seeing the forms for it many weeks ago...
There is one full column immediately after it cross Como Lake. There is one half transition column that they are working on at this time. Then the transition structure itself to bring the skytrain to at-grade prior to entering the South Portal Entrance.

Blue form where the crane is hoisting is the transition column.
[/URL

Re-bar structure of full column north side after crossing over Como Lake:
     
     
  #5627  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 10:31 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,380
many thanks for the great pics!
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
     
     
  #5628  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 4:39 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Work is progressing under and around the Barnet for the North Portal.



From The North Portal Construction view at 9:30 AM today. http://wcs.pbaeng.com/projects/R1_Transit
     
     
  #5629  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 5:57 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Thanks for the pic, red paladin! It looks like in the webcam site, you need to choose the view, "North Portal Construction" to see that...
     
     
  #5630  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 9:25 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Exactly! Sounded like there was some confusion about it earlier.
     
     
  #5631  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 9:37 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,873
It is so strange to actually see structures rising now, just like that it is happening!
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #5632  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 1:00 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
We already know this has already happened (though technically, the first column was at the Burquitlam station itself, is it not?) but they finally broadcasted it in the mainstream news outlets....

http://globalnews.ca/news/776002/first-column-of-the-evergreen-line-installed/

Quote:



The first column of the Evergreen Line has been installed, and construction is on schedule for completion in 2016.

The column has been erected at the corner of Como Lake Avenue and Clarke Road in Coquitlam.
And of course, the inevitable commentary by Gordon Price...

http://www.news1130.com/2013/08/12/evergreen-line-inching-closer-to-reality/

Quote:
COQUITLAM (NEWS1130) – It’s the first tangible sign that the Evergreen Line is coming — the first column is up near Como Lake and Clarke in Coquitlam.

Once that line is complete, things could get a lot busier for transit users.

SFU City Planner Gordon Price says it will be noticeable at certain hubs like Commercial/Broadway. More people will land there by train but they’ll likely be fighting for the same number of buses.

“I do think they’ve maxed out on the ability for Broadway to handle many more buses. There are ways to do it, you really have to change the condition on the street, it’s just not a question of funneling more buses because what will happen is they’ll just start backing up,” explains Price.
     
     
  #5633  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 4:04 AM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,423
Of course if they push for people going to UBC to take the 84 instead, Broadway-commercial might be able to handle the traffic.
     
     
  #5634  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 3:20 PM
Phalonx Phalonx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
Of course if they push for people going to UBC to take the 84 instead, Broadway-commercial might be able to handle the traffic.
I'm not sure how the 84 is these days but back when I last took it about a year ago, it was nearly at crush capacity during peak hours. The worst parts are between VCC and Emily Carr, and between Vine and UBC where pass-ups are a daily occurance. IMO, more people travelling on 4th isn't an option anymore unless they add significantly more capacity (like reduce headways to 3-4 minutes, etc.).

On an Evergreen related topic, scaffolding has gone up around the existing columns at Lougheed station, hopefully the plant life growing in the existing guideway won't cause them any problems.
     
     
  #5635  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 3:34 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
Can't people take the 4 or 44 west of Burrard? The 84 is definitely the fastest way to go between the Millennium Line and UBC.

On another note, RAM Engineering posted this on their Facebook page.

http://www.joconl.com/article/id56494/--calgary-lrt-line-cost-double-original-estimates

The actual cost of Calgary's 8.2km long West LRT Line was a hair under the final $1.336 billion budget, but almoust double the original $700 million budget approved in 2007. The Evergreen Line has a budget of $1.4 billion for the 11km line. How does the West LRT Line cost almost as much for 25% less track, on less challenging terrain, and using rail technology with higher operating costs attached? Significantly higher labour costs there? I paid $105 for an oil change in Edmonton last November which normally costs $73 here.

We got a bargain with our Canada Line and we're going to get one with the Evergreen Line.
     
     
  #5636  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 4:20 PM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
It's been mentioned before that some of the costs associated with the West LRT Line were actually remedial actions that had little to do with the physical line itself, like the building of new schools and roads.
     
     
  #5637  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 4:25 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
I thought our costs included utilities and road construction?

Weird they had to relocate a school.
     
     
  #5638  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 5:11 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
Can't people take the 4 or 44 west of Burrard? The 84 is definitely the fastest way to go between the Millennium Line and UBC.

On another note, RAM Engineering posted this on their Facebook page.

http://www.joconl.com/article/id56494/--calgary-lrt-line-cost-double-original-estimates

The actual cost of Calgary's 8.2km long West LRT Line was a hair under the final $1.336 billion budget, but almoust double the original $700 million budget approved in 2007. The Evergreen Line has a budget of $1.4 billion for the 11km line. How does the West LRT Line cost almost as much for 25% less track, on less challenging terrain, and using rail technology with higher operating costs attached? Significantly higher labour costs there? I paid $105 for an oil change in Edmonton last November which normally costs $73 here.

We got a bargain with our Canada Line and we're going to get one with the Evergreen Line.
The issue with the costs on the Calgary LRT has been discussed extensively throughout the years in the appropriate thread in the Calgary section. allan_kuan is correct, and I have seen the obstacles the Calgary LRT had to face for myself (was even surprised at how much "adjustments" are needed with already existing buildings on its route). Its no surprise why it cost so much compared to Evergreen Line, but also note that there is also very specific, and in some cases, unique reasons why, on a per km basis, the Evergreen Line and Canada Line cost the way they are compared to other systems.

There is really no need to bring it up in this specific thread, and its quite out of topic, which will deviate the flow and discussions.
     
     
  #5639  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 5:23 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Also, most of the West LRT is either elevated, underground, or in a very expensive and almost pointless trench... elevated seems to be cheaper. The portion at grade is very small. Over half is UG/Trench and forced the reconstruction of several important intersections. I'm not sure what "easier terrain" that guy is talking about though... the only obstacle Evergreen has is Burnaby Mountain.


Great news to see the first column complete!!!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #5640  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2013, 6:48 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,736
Quote:
The actual cost of Calgary's 8.2km long West LRT Line was a hair under the final $1.336 billion budget, but almoust double the original $700 million budget approved in 2007. The Evergreen Line has a budget of $1.4 billion for the 11km line. How does the West LRT Line cost almost as much for 25% less track, on less challenging terrain, and using rail technology with higher operating costs attached? Significantly higher labour costs there? I paid $105 for an oil change in Edmonton last November which normally costs $73 here.

We got a bargain with our Canada Line and we're going to get one with the Evergreen Line.
Well, if you're worried then that the Evergreen Line could go over budget, it's not going to do that - at least, not for anyone who paid into the capital. If you read the RFP, the funding arrangement is made so that half or so of the funding is deferred to the contractor and paid at the end, with the contractor becoming responsible for anything extra.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.