HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    Vancouver House in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2013, 12:15 AM
ehrgeiz ehrgeiz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2013, 5:29 AM
CBeats CBeats is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 422
Awesome design! And so tall too.

What's with the other three sections of the plan - those super angular buildings? They look cool too, but I don't understand why they are so short.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 9:55 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,761
Globe & Mail article:

http://newsle.com/article/0/67465831/

Quote:
Vancouver’s architecture gets a shot in the arm

Kerry Gold

Special to The Globe and Mail

Published Friday, Mar. 29 2013, 7:40 PM EDT
Last updated Friday, Mar. 29 2013, 7:59 PM EDT

...

They are, however, about to change Vancouver’s downtown skyline. The other European superstar, Denmark’s 37-year-old Bjarke Ingels, whose mixed-use project is slated for the awkward spot at the north end of Granville Street Bridge, was also in Vancouver the same week. Mr. Gugger said they had been texting, and had plans to meet up, but the bleak weather drove Mr. Ingels out of town before that could happen.

The Urban Design Panel recently approved Mr. Ingels’ flashy tower, which twists from a triangular base to a rectangular shape. Reaction all around has been overwhelmingly supportive. Mr. Gugger sounded impressed that Vancouver would be able to support a project as big as the Ingels tower.

“This is an expensive building he’s doing,” he said. “If there is a housing market in Vancouver for that, that’s quite exceptional. It’s a crazy building in terms of structure.”

Developer Ian Gillespie prefers to look at the Ingels tower another way.

“Yes, you do have a more expensive structure going up there, but the reality is, Vancouver has had a strong residential market for over 10 years now, and we are one of the few North American markets – San Francisco would be another, and New York, obviously – that could support this kind of a building.

“But it’s also partly that we are also developing a demographic that is searching for this type of project. And we feel very confident that it will be consumed very rapidly. People have been starved for it. I have absolutely zero doubt the market is going to embrace it like no one’s ever embraced anything like anything before.”

Buyers from around the world are interested in living in the 52-storey residential tower, says Mr. Gillespie, who has a waiting list to show for it. The 51-year-old has been a developer for roughly 26 years, and he sounds nothing short of stoked to be at a place in his career where he’s able to join forces with a renowned architect such as Mr. Ingels. They are also collaborating on a Calgary residential tower. And Mr. Gillespie said he’s got yet another Ingels project up his sleeve for Vancouver, but he refused to elaborate.

He says he is building upon previous successes such as the Woodward’s Building and the Shangri-La. As Vancouver grows in population, the city grows in stature. Mr. Gillespie feels that he, as a developer, has come of age along with the city. He’s at a point where he can “take the foot off the pedal from a budget perspective.” He also wanted to look at more interesting structural form than the towers that preside over the skyline so far.

Mr. Gugger, while a fan of “charming” Gastown, was not as impressed with the shiny new growth of residential towers.

“The recent ones seem to be a bit off the shelf, I would say,” noted Mr. Gugger. “They look to me more like investments, than what housing normally is, which is to create a home for someone.”

Mr. Gillespie wants to be at the forefront of that transition, and he already sees a shift in thinking.

“At what point did we stop looking to build a city full of background buildings?”

However, it’s also true that “you can’t have a city entirely made up of buildings like [the Ingels tower],” he adds. “It would be insane. But at the same time, you want to mix it up a little bit.

“And to be frank, I don’t know if there’s another developer in the city who could pull this off. You have to build a few exceptional buildings first in order to do something like this.

“I know, myself, I wouldn’t I would have been able to do this five years ago.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 5:31 AM
Crows Crows is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
exciting! I wonder where his new surprise will be!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 5:23 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crows View Post
exciting! I wonder where his new surprise will be!!
I think someone mentioned it was on the site of the parking lot of one of the churches across from th wall center on burrard. Or maybe I'm just making that up completely?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 5:49 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
I'd never heard that but that would be interesting. The church beside the YMCA has quite a large parking lot, in addition to an adjacent row of junky buildings which could be demolished and incorporated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 6:06 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
The city is currently undergoing the Westend community planning work. I would think we could see that work complete before a proposal is processed on that site...

Last edited by jlousa; Apr 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 6:17 PM
s211 s211 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
I think someone mentioned it was on the site of the parking lot of one of the churches across from th wall center on burrard. Or maybe I'm just making that up completely?
I'm not sure how much of the Westbank / First Baptist proposal will be market versus non-market. I'm not sure that would be the site for a really eye-popping design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 7:08 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
Oh no! I want to see something being built on that parking lot, but nothing taller than 30 floors, so my view of West End is not blocked. The inner NIMBY in me woke up.

But in all seriousness, having a taller tower on that parking lot would make the area around Nelson and Burrard feel very dense. But as the lot is right next to Patina, I am pretty sure they can't build it very tall, if at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 8:41 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,761
Looks like Telus' Sky Tower in Calgary (also by BIG) is the mate to 1400 Howe (looks like they could fit together)

http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/story.html?id=8616228
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 9:58 PM
Laniatus Laniatus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Looks like Telus' Sky Tower in Calgary (also by BIG) is the mate to 1400 Howe (looks like they could fit together)

http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/story.html?id=8616228
hmm... i actually don't like this one... 1400 howe looks much nicer imo. They do look like two parts to the same puzzle though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 11:17 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
I like the Calgary tower more, especially because its got an office component.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 11:35 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,394
the Calgary proposal looks meh to me at best.
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 11:35 PM
s211 s211 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
I like the Calgary tower more, especially because its got an office component.
A tale of two cities, implicitly therein.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 11:51 PM
NewWester NewWester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
A tale of two cities, implicitly therein.
Pretty much, eh? Jameson House/1400 Howe and The Bow/Sky Tower. Both matching pairs almost look like they could fit together or are opposites. I wonder if that was done on purpose for either pair of projects?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 1:39 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
It just seems weird with the buildings surrounding it. Would be happy to have it in Vancouver, but I also prefer the Beach and Howe Tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 6:12 AM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
testify
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Looks like Telus' Sky Tower in Calgary (also by BIG) is the mate to 1400 Howe (looks like they could fit together)

http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/story.html?id=8616228
that video makes calgary's skyline look like 🞵🞵🞵🞵, but it's a great building, a shame they didn't go with that one for the office component of their vancouver project instead of what they went with. ingels has been playing with this form in several ways in several cities, leaving him a definite "phase" over the past 2-3 years, good for vancouver to score probably the best one (that will actually be built).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2013, 12:19 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
If only that were the design for the residential tower of Vancouver's Telus Gardens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2013, 2:48 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
It appears that this will be headed to public hearing:

http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20130924/regu20130924ag.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2013, 8:38 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Public Hearing is scheduled for October 24th

__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.