Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145
You have every right to be proud of Salt Lake City's performing arts scene ToysNoiz. Generally in the performing arts Salt Lake City is above San Diego, particularly in the fields of Dance and Choral Programs. Salt Lake City out ranks most major metros in the performing arts, and has been lauded by the New York Times on a regular basis.
If you were to take in to account the opportunities available per capita for each budding performer, Chicago doesn't even hold a candle to Salt Lake City.
|
And yet, SLC isn't known far and wide as an arts destination. I think this is worth discussing because that could change, but I don't think adding a big venue, etc, is really going to do it.
As I look at cities with very strong arts as a major share of the economy, I see strong arts ecosystems. For example, they have multiple arts schools — so students, innovators, low wage content producers. I have friends in NYC, Chicago, Boston and LA at these sorts of schools. Then, there are many places for young, arts-oriented people to get jobs as they progress. And finally, there are bigger, wealthier organizations that fund content production and distribution (distribution seems like a oft-overlooked key here). I don't really see much of that in SLC or Utah. Which is sad, because I love the arts. Hence, 99 percent of the people I know who are really serious about a career in art (be it painting, film, music, etc) have left Utah.
It may be true that there are more opportunities for dancers in SLC than in San Diego. But if you're really serious about dancing (and you're good) neither of those cities are going to be your top choice.
Adding a first-run broadway theater is awesome. I fully support it. But it seems like it's impact on SLC's arts ecosystem will be similar to adding a chain restaurant to a city's culinary ecosystem. So, minimal.