HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5361  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2013, 3:48 PM
TownGuy's Avatar
TownGuy TownGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Cobourg, ON
Posts: 3,565
     
     
  #5362  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2013, 4:15 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Wouldn't it be nice if the old RBC tower and the Aldred building were like, 50m taller?
Or twice as tall.
     
     
  #5363  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2013, 8:12 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Toronto skyline still looks pretty sparce from this angle. The second shot mostly.
     
     
  #5364  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2013, 8:41 PM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
It's hard to see from that second shot just how dense part of Toronto is. However, I do agree it looks sparce in places and could do with many more towers.
     
     
  #5365  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2013, 2:04 AM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed

Last edited by thmx; Jun 24, 2013 at 4:18 AM. Reason: delete
     
     
  #5366  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2013, 5:16 AM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,273
     
     
  #5367  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 3:48 AM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,273
     
     
  #5368  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 3:57 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Toronto skyline still looks pretty sparce from this angle. The second shot mostly.
Toronto can look very dense from some angles to the point where tourists expect an imposing sight when walking about our core. After visiting many comment that Toronto looks bigger in photos than in person. What quickly becomes apparent is that we have a very dense CBD, but the rest is only now beginning to fill in.

Just look at the difference AURA is making. It clarifies how most of our core is still mostly low and mid rise with a few tall buildings here and there. The geographic footprint of our core is huge and it will take another 200+ buildings before it starts feeling like the CBD from the lake to Yorkville and University to Jarvis.

It'll start feeling like that in 3-4 years given the amount of proposals on the table.
     
     
  #5369  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 5:03 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Those Calgary photos are amazing. It's hard to believe they were taken on the eve of the greatest disaster our city has ever faced.
     
     
  #5370  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 8:29 AM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
I agree, SurrealPlaces...you're a darn good photographer, some of the best Calgary shots I've seen.
     
     
  #5371  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 2:09 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,273
     
     
  #5372  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 2:10 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,149
... and now to follow those up with cell phone shots with date/time stamps!





     
     
  #5373  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 2:11 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,273
     
     
  #5374  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 2:16 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,273

Morning Glory by aoberg, on Flickr
     
     
  #5375  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 2:21 PM
yorktonite yorktonite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 189
A couple pictures I took during the supermoon:



     
     
  #5376  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 3:48 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,273
     
     
  #5377  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 4:12 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,506
Toronto's skyline looks most impressive when on the island in my opinion. There is a certain angle that looks like a NYC row of buildings because it gets Cityplace across through Southcore, as well as the downtown buildings. It's literally a huge row of buildings all glistening off the water. Looks incredible.

Realistically though, Toronto still has a fairly sparse skyline compared to other huge cities. Don't get me wrong, it's way ahead of Montreal, Calgary, Vancouver, but it still has a LONG ways to go to compete with Chicago and NYC. I think in about 20 years time, Toronto will be getting into the big leagues as the Yonge and Bloor area fills out, as well as Yonge St from Bloor south the lake shore fills in intensively. Add in the South Core additions as well as City Place and you will have a new skyline.

Toronto will have the 1 Yonge development finished by this time, that will hopefully add 5 towers all above 200m. Plus Massey Tower, the Eaton Center tower, One Bloor, and the Holt Renfrew Tower will all be built... all of which are over 200m. Add in Ten York, Harbour Plaza, the Signature tower, The epic Mirvish towers, new office towers that pop up in the meantime, and new condo projects; we could easily be looking at 30-40 new buildings that exceed 200m being constructed during this time. This would totally transform Toronto's skyline and truly bring it into a new league.

What Toronto does need is some solid new office towers in the 200m+ range. These buildings are usually well built, very thick, and add greatly to the skyline.
     
     
  #5378  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 5:03 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,506
PS those Calgary shots from earlier look great. I still can't get over how much The Bow has added to Calgarys skyline. Add in those two new office tower beasts on Herald Sq (one over 800ft tall) and I think Calgarys skyline will look even better. Way to go , the city is really growing up.
     
     
  #5379  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 5:35 PM
suburbanite's Avatar
suburbanite suburbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto & NYC
Posts: 5,657
That's making quite a few optimistic assumptions about the current group of proposals, let alone the sustainability of demand to warrant even more.
     
     
  #5380  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2013, 5:01 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,495
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.