Quote:
Originally Posted by Empire
I don't need to email them and ask them why they didn't put expensive windows in a 16 storey wall facing a National Historic Site when they didn't have to. No one called them on it and they got away with one.
Here is a blank wall that was constructed in 1983 with the premise of someone building next door and hiding the cheap out. You be the judge of whether the blank wall is O.K. because the developer spent a lot of money in 1983 to build this building.
|
Didn't the developer of the TD building do the same thing? There was a blank wall due to the premise of building on the lot next to it, and now there is an extension going up in that place, I don't consider that cheaping out, it's planning ahead and spending accordingly. Maybe a building will go up next the Homburg building (or better yet, it'll come down). Sure it's unfortunate in that case there is such a large portion of the building with a blank wall for such a long time, thankfully that's not the case with the Citadel.
I guess it's up to the city to decide if the blank wall is reasonable. The site approval document clearly shows the blank wall on page 16 (
http://www.halifax.ca/boardscom/drc/documents/120119drc71.pdf), so I'm not sure it just slipped by them. Regardless, it looks like it's going to be a blank wall, hopefully the guests won't mind not seeing the Citadel in the stairwell and will see it from the multitude of windows facing south.