HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2321  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2013, 12:19 AM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
I thought I've read somewhere that it would be extremely difficult, if not as difficult as Edmonton, to build an LRT tunnel under downtown Calgary because of the high water table. Is this true?

As for Edmonton's LRT stations, I like the Bay/Enterprise Square and Corona ones the best. I love those shiny 70s-era metallic walls and those huge chandeliers in the Corona Station. Grandin happens to be one of my least favourite - those escalators have been closed for God knows how long, and it's a pretty deep station, which means a lot of stairs to/from the surface. And that's especially if the elevators get closed, too.
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #2322  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2013, 12:41 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
I don't know... part of the tunnel is already built under city hall, and it connects with an operational tunnel under the tracks. I don't see how it could be any more difficult for us to build a tunnel under a street if Vancouver could build one under false creek? We have underground parkades in Calgary only one or two hundred meters from the river... so I can't really see that being part of the issue. The tunnel would be under 8th Avenue, about a kilometer from the river.


PS. I agree with you about Grandin Station being too deep, that's where my bf and I got off the train the other day to start exploring downtown, and it's quite the trek just to get out of the station, especially considering his legs were in serious pain from rugby
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #2323  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 4:41 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
A direct synchronized comparison of the Expo Line of the skytrain line 26 years ago, and the Expo Line today. Wow, Metro Vancouver has changed so much. This uncatalogues the changes in only a small portion of Vancouver, about half of Burnaby, and less than half of New Westminster. I think the video is beautiful.

Video Link
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #2324  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 5:56 AM
Morningrise's Avatar
Morningrise Morningrise is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 47
Awesome video! It's really incredible how much Vancouver has changed since then.
     
     
  #2325  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 3:31 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Layton's Brylcreem View Post
And now Calgary needs to build a very expensive tunnel—or is it two tunnels—though the downtown to connect the proposed SE and North Central lines, and increase capacity on the existing lines.
The major difference is Calgary's commuting/development patterns have solidly latched onto the radial network and the City has built around it. It is now a matter of meeting the demands of a public with a transit mentality rather than developing the transit mentality. Before I get called out for saying Calgary is a transit city, I'm mainly talking about the work commute.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
     
     
  #2326  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 3:32 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by shreddog View Post
Hmmmm, both Calgary and Edmonton have spent roughly the same on their LRT networks. Calgary's is twice as big and carries 3 times the passengers.

Sure, Calgary could have spent a shitload on the DT ug portion and had a smaller network with less boardings but at least it wouldn't have any congestion DT!!

Funny, I always thought the role of public transit was to move people and not reduce congestion DT ... silly me!
Revenue ridership per capita, 2012

Edmonton Transit System - 102
Calgary Transit - 88
     
     
  #2327  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 4:45 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
We have underground parkades in Calgary only one or two hundred meters from the river... so I can't really see that being part of the issue. The tunnel would be under 8th Avenue, about a kilometer from the river.

My sisters parkade in the Marquis floods every year. It's only one floor iirc.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #2328  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 5:18 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Oh shit, I have heard about that, I forgot. But again, the subway tunnel will be much farther from the river than that. I work in Suncor Energy Centre less than half a km from the river and our 4.5 level parkade has never flooded as far as I know.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #2329  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 6:20 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,962
Went to the APTA reports {god it pisses me off having to go to a US site to get Canadian info!} and Calgary ridership is up a blistering 11% from last year and Ottawa down 5% which makes Calgary Canada's fourth largest transit agency for the first time I believe...............good work Calgary!

Toronto and Montreal are both off slightly but the BC stats are unreal. Vancouver is down 11% and Victoria an unbelievable 15%! Calgary now has higher per capita ridership than Vancouver. Population growth has greatly slowed in BC and unemployment has been rising but still that's an unbelievable drop for both cities.
     
     
  #2330  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 6:33 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,090
Calgary have the new West LRT, thus for the increase in ridership. It is now getting really close to the peak level in 2008.

Vancouver had a fare increase on Jan 1st, that would lower ridership at least in the first half of this year.

It is normal for a decrease in ridership this year though, due to having one less day (Feb. 29), and Easter long weekend span from the end of March to April (instead of fully in April last year). In BC, there's the new Family Day long weekend in February too. From TransLink's stat, just February alone, ridership dipped as much as 16%...
     
     
  #2331  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 7:48 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Calgary have the new West LRT, thus for the increase in ridership. It is now getting really close to the peak level in 2008.

Vancouver had a fare increase on Jan 1st, that would lower ridership at least in the first half of this year.

It is normal for a decrease in ridership this year though, due to having one less day (Feb. 29), and Easter long weekend span from the end of March to April (instead of fully in April last year). In BC, there's the new Family Day long weekend in February too. From TransLink's stat, just February alone, ridership dipped as much as 16%...
Just ignore ssiguy, all his posts are about BC unemployment or population growth become negative, honestly it gets tiresome, he has some bizarre vendetta against BC and his findings are always proven to be dead wrong or grossly exaggerated though hard facts / stats, others on this forum have grown tired of correcting his b.s. though.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #2332  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 10:34 AM
ccw219's Avatar
ccw219 ccw219 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Went to the APTA reports {god it pisses me off having to go to a US site to get Canadian info!} and Calgary ridership is up a blistering 11% from last year and Ottawa down 5% which makes Calgary Canada's fourth largest transit agency for the first time I believe...............good work Calgary!

Toronto and Montreal are both off slightly but the BC stats are unreal. Vancouver is down 11% and Victoria an unbelievable 15%! Calgary now has higher per capita ridership than Vancouver. Population growth has greatly slowed in BC and unemployment has been rising but still that's an unbelievable drop for both cities.

New to these. Which reports are you accessing on the APTA site?
     
     
  #2333  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 10:38 AM
ccw219's Avatar
ccw219 ccw219 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
Revenue ridership per capita, 2012

Edmonton Transit System - 102
Calgary Transit - 88
Also fascinated by this. Source?

Comparable numbers in other Canadian metros?
     
     
  #2334  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 2:12 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
Annual ridership for the ttc per capita:

197

(514,000,000 / 2,600,000)

Important to note that a lot of TTC ridership comes from outside of the city of Toronto, meaning that if you we're to only count then residents of the city of Toronto it would likely be lower. Even if you use the population of the entire GTA (which isn't fair as for 2/3rds of the population the TTC isn't their main service) you still end up with 88.
     
     
  #2335  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 4:31 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Where did you get the 2.6 million number from? 514 million rides in one year equals out to 1.408 million rides per day.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #2336  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 8:26 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
2.6 million is the population of Toronto.
     
     
  #2337  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 8:32 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Toronto is 2.8 million now... remember a few months ago the city of Toronto estimates surpassed the city of Chicago estimates...
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #2338  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 9:14 PM
Wigs's Avatar
Wigs Wigs is online now
Great White North
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 16,461
Latest Calgary ridership numbers




__________________
"You can't have a strategy if you don't even have a policy"

Last edited by Wigs; Jun 15, 2013 at 10:03 PM.
     
     
  #2339  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 9:36 PM
OwenChurch OwenChurch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 32
The now and then video for Vancouver is amazing. I have never been to Vancouver, but I like the look of the elevated trains! I wish we had transit like that in Toronto, it seems like it would be more enjoyable than the subway and add to the fabric of the street-scape.

Does anyone know what is going on with LRT in the Peel and Waterloo regions?
     
     
  #2340  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2013, 10:00 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Last I heard was the KW lrt is starting construction this year. I think the one in Peel is on hold? Not certain though.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:39 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.