HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3921  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 8:58 PM
EventHorizon EventHorizon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
The renovated ISDA building is a gem, and it will be nice to see it put to active use:


Italian Sons and Daughters of America Building by joseph a, on Flickr

Very handsome building!

Why would they have even thought about doing this to it in the first place?...


Image from The Atlantic Cities, Courtesy of Pittsburgh History and Landmark Foundation

Last edited by EventHorizon; May 21, 2013 at 9:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3922  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 9:22 PM
Private D Private D is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by EventHorizon View Post

Why would they have even thought about doing this to it in the first place?...


Image from The Atlantic Cities, Courtesy of Pittsburgh History and Landmark Foundation
This happens all the time with great old masonry buildings. Instead of doing the necessary repairs/upkeep, it is far cheaper (from a maintenance and energy standpoint) to just cover the fucker with god-awful aluminum or steel siding.

It's the cheap alternative to actually giving a 🞵🞵🞵🞵.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3923  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 11:30 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
Looking good their, Mr 🞵🞵🞵🞵! Loving those shades.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3924  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 11:35 PM
Steel City Scotty's Avatar
Steel City Scotty Steel City Scotty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 301
Not to talk politics, but the polls in Pittsburgh will be closing in about 20 minutes.

From what I've read, it seems like most posters on here agree that a Bill Peduto victory would be best for the future (development) of Pittsburgh?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3925  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 3:12 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steel City Scotty View Post
From what I've read, it seems like most posters on here agree that a Bill Peduto victory would be best for the future (development) of Pittsburgh?
Looks like we are going to find out!

Just my two cents, but Peduto ran an impressive campaign (not a bad thing in someone running for an executive office), and he specifically won at least in part because he impressed people with his passion for urban policy issues. Of course lots of things could still go wrong (say, a bad dynamic with Council, continued anti-urban sentiments at the state and federal level, and so on). And even under the best of circumstances, I'm not sure if everything Peduto might do on specific issues would meet with favor around here. But overall, by the end it seemed clear to me he was the best candidate for anyone with a forward-looking perspective on Pittsburgh's development possibilities, and with some luck he could turn out to be very good indeed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3926  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 3:17 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Private Dick View Post
This happens all the time with great old masonry buildings. Instead of doing the necessary repairs/upkeep, it is far cheaper (from a maintenance and energy standpoint) to just cover the fucker with god-awful aluminum or steel siding.

It's the cheap alternative to actually giving a 🞵🞵🞵🞵.
Thats not why they did that 🞵🞵🞵🞵 from the 50s-80s. They did it to "modernize" the look of the old buildings to compete with suburban strip malls and keep downtowns relevant. People during that time thought the simpler and more horribly disgusting a building looked the better it was since it was modern.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3927  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 7:07 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,675
Except that like on the building above, some of these "modernizations" most definitely were done to keep down on facade upkeep. When modernization were done for looks, they usually deconstructed the historic facade instead of just covering it up.

There are exceptions, of course, but I'd bet the modernization pictured above was done specifically to cut down on window and facade cleaning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3928  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 10:10 AM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is online now
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
Thats not why they did that 🞵🞵🞵🞵 from the 50s-80s. They did it to "modernize" the look of the old buildings to compete with suburban strip malls and keep downtowns relevant. People during that time thought the simpler and more horribly disgusting a building looked the better it was since it was modern.
I disagree with you to some extent. No question that what you say was partly responsible for the ridiculous and ugly coverings on so many of our masonry facades, but I really believe the maintenance factor was the biggest reason for these monstrosities. Either way, I'm glad to see many to most of them, at least Downtown, being eliminated finally!

Aaron (Glowrock)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3929  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 10:54 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
It was both, of course. It is true that late-19th/early-20th Century urban architecture fell out of fashion in the decades after WWII (this is a common problem--when architecture is only a few decades old, it can strike people as outdated but not yet historic, and lots of buildings get lost in this period of their minimum perceived value). But it is also true that many post-WWII exterior renovations were specifically designed to save costs, in part because manual labor was getting more and more expensive.

Anyway, it is great to have this building back to the way it should be, and in fact it turns out that the way they did the siding, while obviously horrible to look at, was not too damaging and overall kept the building's exterior reasonably well preserved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3930  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 1:04 PM
Private D Private D is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
Thats not why they did that 🞵🞵🞵🞵 from the 50s-80s. They did it to "modernize" the look of the old buildings to compete with suburban strip malls and keep downtowns relevant. People during that time thought the simpler and more horribly disgusting a building looked the better it was since it was modern.
While a ton of classic architecture was destroyed in the process of making them look more "modern", the above case (and similar cases seen all around cities like Pittsburgh) is an example of slapping on cheap metal siding instead of repairing/maintaining/upgrading a building's exterior/fenestration. It became almost standard practice to do this to aging brick industrial buildings in the 70s and 80s, and regrettably it crept to commercial buildings as well.

They still do it today all the time, unfortunately.

Last edited by Private D; May 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3931  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 1:17 PM
Private D Private D is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinlee View Post
Looking good their, Mr 🞵🞵🞵🞵! Loving those shades.
So 🞵🞵🞵🞵.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3932  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 1:30 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Private Dick View Post
So 🞵🞵🞵🞵.
Of course by now she is probably in her 50s (judging from the apparent vintage of the photo).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3933  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 1:47 PM
Found5dollar Found5dollar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 196
Does anyone know what is being built at Center and Melwood? I go by there almost everyday on the bus but just realized they have torn down almost a compete block of buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3934  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 2:49 PM
JDG JDG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Old Nickelodeon Theater....

I just learned from a linked article on PopCity that Pittsburgh was home to the WORLD's first movie theater. I'm a huge fan of movies so I was very excited to learn this. Seems to fit perfectly with the fact that Pittsburgh's been home to so many great films lately...

Does anyone know what's there now? Apparently the Nickelodeon was on Smithfield. Is there even a plaque or anything? I for one think that this is a really cool fact about the city and should be displayed. Furthermore, I would love to see a new movie theater downtown... (who knows, maybe in the former arena site?)

http://www.clpgh.org/exhibit/neighborhoods/downtown/down_n71.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3935  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 3:01 PM
GeneW GeneW is offline
Northsider
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDG View Post
I just learned from a linked article on PopCity that Pittsburgh was home to the WORLD's first movie theater. I'm a huge fan of movies so I was very excited to learn this. Seems to fit perfectly with the fact that Pittsburgh's been home to so many great films lately...

Does anyone know what's there now? Apparently the Nickelodeon was on Smithfield. Is there even a plaque or anything? I for one think that this is a really cool fact about the city and should be displayed. Furthermore, I would love to see a new movie theater downtown... (who knows, maybe in the former arena site?)

http://www.clpgh.org/exhibit/neighborhoods/downtown/down_n71.html
According to Cinema Treasures, it was at 433-435 Smithfield Street although there seems to be a lot of dispute about whether or not that was actually the first dedicated movie theater.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3936  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 4:24 PM
doo dah's Avatar
doo dah doo dah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pulchra Agro
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Found5dollar View Post
Does anyone know what is being built at Center and Melwood? I go by there almost everyday on the bus but just realized they have torn down almost a compete block of buildings.
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=6130321&postcount=3873
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3937  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 4:45 PM
doo dah's Avatar
doo dah doo dah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pulchra Agro
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDG View Post
I just learned from a linked article on PopCity that Pittsburgh was home to the WORLD's first movie theater. I'm a huge fan of movies so I was very excited to learn this. Seems to fit perfectly with the fact that Pittsburgh's been home to so many great films lately...

Does anyone know what's there now? Apparently the Nickelodeon was on Smithfield. Is there even a plaque or anything? I for one think that this is a really cool fact about the city and should be displayed. Furthermore, I would love to see a new movie theater downtown... (who knows, maybe in the former arena site?)

http://www.clpgh.org/exhibit/neighborhoods/downtown/down_n71.html
Yes, there is a plaque:


There are some arguments that the first movie theater was Tally's Electric Theater in Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3938  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 5:03 PM
doo dah's Avatar
doo dah doo dah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pulchra Agro
Posts: 69
...oh, and my husband, the Hamburger in Pittsburgh, says Hamburg has way more bridges than us OR Venice, about 2300. Whatever, I say
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3939  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 6:06 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
You have to watch those canal cities--if they throw a plank over a gutter with running water they will call it a bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3940  
Old Posted May 22, 2013, 6:19 PM
JDG JDG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Nickelodeon Theather... New Movie Theater Downtown?

wow, thanks all for the info on the old Nickelodeon theater! Great to see they have a plaque down there too. Any thoughts on a new movie theater downtown? All the theaters around here seem to be either very small or further out of the city. I think movie theaters are always a nice way to draw a crowd into an area.... I'd love to see something like the AMC Loews Theater that's on the Boston Common. Has anyone ever heard of anything like that ever discussed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.