HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3721  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 4:09 AM
Leo the Dog Leo the Dog is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Lower-48
Posts: 4,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sepstein View Post
I think its great looking! Just wish we could 10 of those downtown but 3 times the height! The random balconys hanging out is alittle odd but other than that its Sweet special that Pool Area sick!
I strangely like this building too for some reason.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3722  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 4:52 AM
phxSUNSfan's Avatar
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo the Dog View Post
I strangely like this building too for some reason.
Same here...can't put my finger on it, but I like it. Usually these plain, modern highrises don't work for me but this one is different. To be fair, that picture does make it look much more dull than it actually is in person. That is most likely the case due to the fact that when you see the building on foot, you notice that the bottom floors are all glass and it makes the whole thing look better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3723  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 5:40 AM
Spitfiredude Spitfiredude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by phxSUNSfan View Post
Same here...can't put my finger on it, but I like it. Usually these plain, modern highrises don't work for me but this one is different. To be fair, that picture does make it look much more dull than it actually is in person. That is most likely the case due to the fact that when you see the building on foot, you notice that the bottom floors are all glass and it makes the whole thing look better.
Nope...I pass by it at least twice a day and it never looks any better than the last time I passed by it. Its ugly. High rises are meant to be glass. IDK what the one guy is saying of the pool. No one has seen the damn pool yet besides in renderings lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3724  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 6:05 AM
phxSUNSfan's Avatar
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfiredude View Post
Nope...I pass by it at least twice a day and it never looks any better than the last time I passed by it. Its ugly. High rises are meant to be glass. IDK what the one guy is saying of the pool. No one has seen the damn pool yet besides in renderings lol
Haha! Well, we can't really say "yes" or "no" about other peoples' opinions. We can disagree, which a few of us here do, but there is no right or wrong answer. However, I have to say that the renderings of the pool area look very cool...especially with the large projection screen similar to the one on W6. That is a large projection right? And not a large video screen on W6?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3725  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 1:11 PM
TempeSilverFox's Avatar
TempeSilverFox TempeSilverFox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tempe AZ
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by phxSUNSfan View Post
Haha! Well, we can't really say "yes" or "no" about other peoples' opinions. We can disagree, which a few of us here do, but there is no right or wrong answer. However, I have to say that the renderings of the pool area look very cool...especially with the large projection screen similar to the one on W6. That is a large projection right? And not a large video screen on W6?
It actually is a massive TV, not a projection. I work at Chase in downtown Tempe and park in the tower opposite the pool deck at W6 and am always curious to see what they are watching haha!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3726  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 3:03 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Stumbled upon an old article on the Tempe streetcar and I'm still kind of struggling with the proposed options. The new alignments were based on new guidelines that prefer routes that encourage dense development along the way- has anyone heard how they decided these routes were the best fit?

The option running east on Apache to Terrace makes almost no sense at all to me. There aren't many lots left in that area of Apache to develop, and the residents along that corridor are already in walking distance of light rail, which connects them to Mill. What is typical trip they are envisioning for potential riders?

I have the same issue with the Rio option- why bother with the Apache piece? Why would you not take that mile or so and extend the Rio leg east toward McClintock? That would link ASU, downtown Tempe, Tempe Marketplace, Sports District, etc. and connect all of those served by light rail. The current Rio option ends at Hayden Ferry- if the goal is development, why is it stopping exactly where developed properties end?

I just don't see who would actually ride this along these routes, or how this complements LRT- if anything, it seems like this would cannibalize light rail's ridership. I would love if someone could educate me if I am missing something, but there just don't seem to be any new areas or amenities served that aren't already fairly accessible via transit, and the development opportunities seem minimal. Most of the potential areas, such as Ash or the few lots within this area of Apache, are again fairly close to existing transit and/or within dense areas, so I would think that if development were to happen, having a streetcar stop adjacent opposed to a LRT stop .25 miles away wouldn't have much of an impact... Or does it?

I'm happy to see more options enter the mix, but am disappointed at what seems like a missed opportunity.

Last edited by Jjs5056; May 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3727  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 4:44 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,349
Jeff Speck urges his readers to think of modern streetcar projects more as "pedestrian accelators" than transit projects like light rail. In other words, a streetcar running through a developed area around ASU and Mill would make people empowered to travel longer distances from light rail stations. On the other hand, Jarrett Walker had a good piece in the Atlanta paper about how this approach only works when you have high frequency service:

http://www.myajc.com/news/news/opinion/s...itationbox_apr2013_ajcstubtomyajcpremium

If Tempe can fund service every 5 or 10 minutes, the pedestrian accelerator concept might work. If it's every 15 or 20 minutes, it won't help. I think the current proposals make a lot more sense than the earlier one that extended down Mill into neighborhoods of single-family homes. Nevertheless, the most logical one would follow Rio Salado farther east toward Tempe Marketplace (as tacky as it is, it is a substantial trip generator) and the new Cubs stadium in Mesa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3728  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 5:01 PM
Spitfiredude Spitfiredude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by phxSUNSfan View Post
Haha! Well, we can't really say "yes" or "no" about other peoples' opinions. We can disagree, which a few of us here do, but there is no right or wrong answer. However, I have to say that the renderings of the pool area look very cool...especially with the large projection screen similar to the one on W6. That is a large projection right? And not a large video screen on W6?
Definitely true. It is a TV and not a projection. I do believe at least the pool area will probably be VERY cool from the renderings, but I am just so disappointed (personally) on how the building turned out on the exterior that I'm not sold just yet! Plus I think he made it kind of seemed like he had already been there...I was just being a stickler......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3729  
Old Posted May 15, 2013, 5:05 PM
Classical in Phoenix's Avatar
Classical in Phoenix Classical in Phoenix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: A place with bigger haboobs than yours
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by phxSUNSfan View Post
Haha! Well, we can't really say "yes" or "no" about other peoples' opinions. We can disagree, which a few of us here do, but there is no right or wrong answer. However, I have to say that the renderings of the pool area look very cool...especially with the large projection screen similar to the one on W6. That is a large projection right? And not a large video screen on W6?
Disagreeing just isn't the same without Vicelord.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3730  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 12:06 AM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfiredude View Post
Nope...I pass by it at least twice a day and it never looks any better than the last time I passed by it. Its ugly. High rises are meant to be glass. IDK what the one guy is saying of the pool. No one has seen the damn pool yet besides in renderings lol
Interestingly enough, high-rises did not start being made out of glass. In fact, the first high-rises were all made out of masonry, with steel support, and had a lot less glass than the View has now. The Monadnock building in Chicago and th Prudential Building in Buffalo are great examples of non-glass high-rises.




In fact, there are really awesome contemporary high rises that are not entirely glass clad. Such as the Porter House in NYC by shop architects:



I am not a huge fan of The Hub aesthetically, but I don't think it is an eyesore either. Plus looking at it from the urban standpoint, it brings a lot of density into a vacant lot. It has a lot of retail space. And its parking garage is not only tucked away, but also is kinda small for the amount of people that will live there, encouraging people to walk, bike, or take the light rail. Aesthetics aside, it is a great addition to downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3731  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 2:57 AM
cygnusloop99's Avatar
cygnusloop99 cygnusloop99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arquitect View Post
Interestingly enough, high-rises did not start being made out of glass. In fact, the first high-rises were all made out of masonry, with steel support, and had a lot less glass than the View has now. The Monadnock building in Chicago and th Prudential Building in Buffalo are great examples of non-glass high-rises.




In fact, there are really awesome contemporary high rises that are not entirely glass clad. Such as the Porter House in NYC by shop architects:



I am not a huge fan of The Hub aesthetically, but I don't think it is an eyesore either. Plus looking at it from the urban standpoint, it brings a lot of density into a vacant lot. It has a lot of retail space. And its parking garage is not only tucked away, but also is kinda small for the amount of people that will live there, encouraging people to walk, bike, or take the light rail. Aesthetics aside, it is a great addition to downtown.
Great analysis!!! And on a side note, i am also a fan of SHoP projects, they do good work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3732  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 3:15 AM
nickw252 nickw252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Mesa
Posts: 1,647
I really like the appearance of The Hub. I'm glad it's not covered in stupid southwestish colors like orange and teal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3733  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 3:44 AM
phxSUNSfan's Avatar
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickw252 View Post
I really like the appearance of The Hub. I'm glad it's not covered in stupid southwestish colors like orange and teal.
Orange and teal are southwestish? I always thought of turquoise, copper, and browns as southwestern colors. I really like that building in NYC by SHoP Architects...That should have been done, albeit on a smaller scale, with the buildings that were knocked down by U.S. Airways Center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3734  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 4:16 AM
Spitfiredude Spitfiredude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 314
Agreed, if you look at US Airways and Gateway Center, they are masonry as well. I think I was getting at everything BUT stucco. But like others said, opinions are opinions. Some people will like it, some will not...but it is definitely controversial.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3735  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 6:04 AM
MegaBass MegaBass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 645
ASU Walk-Only Zones Next Fall

Quote:
In an effort to promote pedestrian safety on the ASU Tempe campus, ASU will launch the first of three Walk-Only Zones in high foot-traffic areas at the start of the fall 2013 semester.

In addition to the Walk-Only Zones, actions are underway to improve and ease access for pedestrians across campus including these enhancements: bicycle valet areas; new bicycle rack types and locations; locked skateboard racks; and overnight golf cart charging and parking areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3736  
Old Posted May 20, 2013, 6:42 PM
ApacheRedevelopment ApacheRedevelopment is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
1010 E Lemon aka "The Grand"



220 unit student apartment project to be located at 1010 E Lemon Street. This project will include ground floor retail.

Apache Redevelopment
https://www.facebook.com/Apache.Redevelopment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3737  
Old Posted May 20, 2013, 6:57 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,206
/\Nice... that piece of land is prime. I can't believe it has been vacant for so long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3738  
Old Posted May 20, 2013, 7:31 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,441
They cleared the mobile home lot for which this project is presently proposed during the boom, as a reminder. Can't remember for what project specifically.

This is more value-engineered meh, and student housing at that which will be vacant four months out of the year. It's a shame developers aren't concentrating on full-time housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3739  
Old Posted May 20, 2013, 8:01 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,206
/\ Not necessarily... unless these are dorms and actually close in the summer, many students live in places more more than a semester or two, and there will be students there year round. That area is the "student ghetto", so it makes sense to me that these are student apartments. I doubt many normal people would want to live in an area like that with so many students so close to ASU.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3740  
Old Posted May 20, 2013, 9:58 PM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
/\ Not necessarily... unless these are dorms and actually close in the summer, many students live in places more more than a semester or two, and there will be students there year round. That area is the "student ghetto", so it makes sense to me that these are student apartments. I doubt many normal people would want to live in an area like that with so many students so close to ASU.
Very true. Plus as I have stated before, you don't have to be a student to live at any of these "student housing" projects. They are marketed towards students, and most of the apartment layouts are geared towards student life, but anyone who wants to can rent out a place there. It just happens to be that they are being built in Tempe, and most of the people looking to rent here are students.

I think this is a decent project. Of course there could be something better, but there could always be something better. This project would continue the trend of density in the Apache/Rural area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:30 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.