HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3661  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
Well shucks...first time posting in months with a desire to post something MAJOR and get played. Hopefully not, I really liked the concept.
Tempe had plans to extend to the lake to Priest during the boom, but I can't imagine they would consider it again with the money being spent on the western dam.

But, yes, a pretty cool concept and highlights what poor longterm vision Mesa and Phoenix had by not jumping on board with the Rio Salado project. While the recession put a hold on many developments, there's no question Tempe's lakefront property is extremely desirable and a huge asset to the city.

Can't wait for the next lakefront project to get underway; it's been too long! Wonder what it will be? Southbank? State Farm? Oliver McMillan?

I also wonder what will become of the former Onyx site. I doubt a high rise will ever go up, but I hope it's at least taller than Northshore. That development- Playa del Norte- could use home variance in height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3662  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2013, 12:48 AM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
Well shucks...first time posting in months with a desire to post something MAJOR and get played. Hopefully not, I really liked the concept.
As cool as it might sound, it is completely unfeasible. The amount of water to expand the lake that much would be insane. Haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3663  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 5:00 AM
AJphx AJphx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfiredude View Post
I e-mailed Harkins Theatres about opening a location at Centerpoint and here is their response:

"...we have made every effort as we think it should be a home grown operator here rather than a foreign company. However, the developer is currently working with another company and unfortunately, it is not our decision....."

Looks like Harkins is not a candidate for the Madcap.
Lol. Good. I imagine the developer is skeptical about the company that left centerpoint in the first place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3664  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2013, 3:46 PM
TempeSilverFox's Avatar
TempeSilverFox TempeSilverFox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tempe AZ
Posts: 153
Tempe Street Car

Hey all! This article was just run in the AZ Republic about the street car! Looks like the project has just taken a major step forward!

Here is the link, but the article is below:
http://www.azcentral.com/community/tempe...pe-trolley-downtown-project-cleared.html


Tempe’s plans for a downtown and waterfront streetcar took a major step forward Friday, when federal officials announced they had cleared the project to enter the final stages of development.

The Federal Transit Administration did not approve any money for the estimated $130 million, roughly 2.7-mile streetcar track. But the project’s inclusion in a go-ahead list significantly improves the odds. It is almost unheard of for the FTA to scuttle a project once it’s been cleared.

Tempe and Fort Lauderdale, Fla., are the only U.S. cities whose streetcar projects were advanced by the Obama administration in its announcement of $2.1 billion in proposed transit-construction spending.

“This is a great step toward making modern streetcar a reality for this community,” said David Schwartz, executive director at Friends of Transit.

Added Tempe Councilwoman Shana Ellis: “This has been a very long journey, and I’m very excited this has been advanced.”

Tempe envisions a system similar to one in Portland, Ore. Typically streetcar systems have more frequent service and more closely bunched stations than light-rail lines. Transit planners prefer streetcars over light-rail trains for short routes with lots of quick trips. Streetcars are favored over buses where planners expect redevelopment along the tracks.

Tucson is the only other Arizona city with a streetcar project moving forward, though it has been plagued by delays.

In Tempe, a new round of public hearings will begin next month to pick the streetcar’s exact route and stations. Two options exist:

An L-shaped route along Mill Avenue and Apache Boulevard.

A C-shaped system that doesn’t go as far east on Apache Boulevard but adds a leg along Rio Salado Parkway.

Both options include a loop in downtown Tempe. Planners say the public could ride in 2015 at the earliest. News of federal approval comes as the Valley’s transit network picks up steam.

On Monday, Phoenix opened a $644 million automatic people mover connecting Metro light rail to Sky Harbor Airport, and it carried twice as many passengers in the first couple of days than predicted. A second phase is under construction.

Construction is also under way on two light-rail extensions, in Mesa and along 19th Avenue in Phoenix. Plans are accelerating to extend light rail deeper into Mesa and well as to Metrocenter Mall in northwest Phoenix, and plans are advancing for light-rail extensions west and south from downtown Phoenix.

“We’re advancing transit in the Valley. We’re doing good things and we’re leveraging that with out federal partners,” Metro CEO Steve Banta said.

Tempe’s project has at times been touch-and-go but has now crossed a significant milestone. Transportation wonks call it entering the pipeline, the shortcut word used to describe the sometimes lengthy process to win federal approvals and funding. The FTA does not spend money on projects until it clears them for the pipeline. And the recently passed federal transportation bill shortens the pipeline.

Under the new regulations, Metro can design, engineer and study the environmental impacts in one phase and build the track in a second. Previously, it took more steps to get to construction.

Metro has in hand $41 million from Proposition 400, the countywide half-cent-per-dollar sales tax, plus $32 million in federal clean-air money. The agency is seeking $56 in federal transit funds to make up the balance and begin work. “The fact that the FTA advanced the streetcar means they understand the project has plenty of merits,” Valley Metro planning manager Ben Limmer said.

That was not always the case.

The FTA declined a previous grant application. At that time, the region proposed a line heading south down Mill Avenue, and projected it would only carry 1,100 passengers a day. That made it uncompetitive with other projects in the country. Planners shifted gears and came up with a shorter system that connected Tempe’s most densely populated areas.

The FTA did not say, and planners don’t yet know, how competitive the current plan will be under the new law. By one key measure, the proportion of local money invested, Tempe’s project stacks up well against similar-size “Small Starts” projects. Only the Fort Lauderdale streetcar and a rapid-bus project in Oakland are asking the FTA to contribute smaller portions of funding, as a percentage.

Even before it was a streetcar, Tempe’s project had morphed. Originally, voters approved a short light-rail spur on Rural Road when they passed Prop. 400 in 2004. But studies revealed it would cost too much and carry too few. It was recast as the downtown streetcar project.

“Light rail succeeded beyond everybody’s wildest expectations and I think our streetcar will, too,” Ellis said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3665  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 8:43 PM
Land Arch Student Land Arch Student is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 8
I'm really glad this is happening for Tempe. It will be a great project and may be the final pin needed to spur development west of Ash and along Rio Salado. Hopefully I'll be able to attend the council meetings and get some additional information.
Personally I think the C-shaped route that extends to Rio Salado is the best option. The L-shaped option that extends past Rural seems redundant. I don't think the streetcar and Light Rail need to connect at two separate intersections that are within less than 3 miles of each other. The connection at Mill will be sufficient. Also that portion of Apache is only student housing. We don't need a rail line to move just students from their dorms to Mill.

The C-shaped route creates potential for the continued development of Hayden Ferry Lakeside, State Farm, ASU's Rio Salado Eco District, Southbank, Tempe Marketplace, the Cubs development, and Mesa Riverview. There is WAY more potential to create a East/West economic and residential corridor that will bring in greater population and more taxes to Tempe, all while being spurred by sustainable transit.

I thought the original plan to extend the line south of Apache would have helped bring more shoppers into Downtown Tempe and better connect south Tempe with the Downtown district, but I guess not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3666  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 9:44 PM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land Arch Student View Post
I'm really glad this is happening for Tempe. It will be a great project and may be the final pin needed to spur development west of Ash and along Rio Salado. Hopefully I'll be able to attend the council meetings and get some additional information.
Personally I think the C-shaped route that extends to Rio Salado is the best option. The L-shaped option that extends past Rural seems redundant. I don't think the streetcar and Light Rail need to connect at two separate intersections that are within less than 3 miles of each other. The connection at Mill will be sufficient. Also that portion of Apache is only student housing. We don't need a rail line to move just students from their dorms to Mill.

The C-shaped route creates potential for the continued development of Hayden Ferry Lakeside, State Farm, ASU's Rio Salado Eco District, Southbank, Tempe Marketplace, the Cubs development, and Mesa Riverview. There is WAY more potential to create a East/West economic and residential corridor that will bring in greater population and more taxes to Tempe, all while being spurred by sustainable transit.

I thought the original plan to extend the line south of Apache would have helped bring more shoppers into Downtown Tempe and better connect south Tempe with the Downtown district, but I guess not.
Completely agree, the C shaped routed is the best one in terms of allowing for future expansion of the system and also addressing the realities of today. I hope construction begins promptly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3667  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 7:08 PM
nickw252 nickw252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Mesa
Posts: 1,647
OliverMcMillan buys land for $50 million Tempe Town Lake luxury apartment project

Quote:
OliverMcMillan officially took over a 3.7-acre site along Tempe Town Lake this week, sealing the deal for an estimated $50 million luxury apartment project that will eventually be wedged between the lake’s narrow strip of large corporate tenants.

The San Diego-based developer paid $5.8 million for the site in a transaction that closed escrow on Monday, local real estate broker Michael Lieb, who handled the deal, told me. Lieb previously estimated the project to cost roughly $50 million, although OliverMcMillan declined to comment.

The site is located along Rio Salado Parkway near Mill Avenue, just east of the Hayden Ferry Lakeside office project and west of the planned 1 million-plus square foot regional headquarters that State Farm Insurance is aiming to build within the next few years. It was sold by Scottsdale-based Sunbelt Holdings Inc.


[“Tempe is a great city with a young, growing population,” Dene Oliver, CEO of OliverMcMillan, told me in a statement Tuesday. “We are looking forward to creating a thoughtfully designed project that reflects our mission of making special places happen.”

Blueprints for the four-story apartment project, dubbed The Lofts at Hayden Ferry, had been contingent on both city approval and the land deal. Tempe City Council approved the plans — comprised of 264 luxury units and two levels of underground parking — in late November.

Construction will begin later this year, company officials said.

The Lofts at Hayden Ferry also marks a return to the Valley for OliverMcMillan, which made its debut in 1987 with the development of Regents Centre in Tempe, formerly the corporate headquarters for America West Airlines.
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2013/04/17/olivermcmillan-buys-land-for-50.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3668  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 7:39 PM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Great news! Hopefully we can see construction beginning soon.

In other news, KJZZ had an interview today with the owner of the Improv. It is scheduled to reopen soon. He stated that they completely redid the entire space. Although personally there was something that disillusioned me. The owner also owns Stand Up Live downtown, and instead of trying to get different types of acts, or different feels for each location, he is basically going to have the same acts in each club. This metropolitan area is definitely big enough for multiple comedy clubs, but I think that having exactly the same thing goig on in two of them is a dumb idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3669  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 9:03 PM
Spitfiredude Spitfiredude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 314
There is a Wells Fargo bank that is proposed to go in at University Centre (east of Firehouse) on University Drive. Waste Management recently installed their logo on the south side of the Gateway building (I'm assuming they took lease of the rest of the space). A preliminary site plan is going through the City of Tempe called Southbank Apartments (at the Southbank site). Address is 1201 E VISTA DEL LAGO DR according to the COT website.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3670  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 9:15 PM
Spitfiredude Spitfiredude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 314
"Marina Heights submitted a preliminary site plan to the city on April 8th 2013. This development will be located at the SW corner of Rural and Rio Salado" via Apache Redevelopment. These are the towers that were going to range 80-260 ft.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3671  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 9:25 PM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitfiredude View Post
"Marina Heights submitted a preliminary site plan to the city on April 8th 2013. This development will be located at the SW corner of Rural and Rio Salado" via Apache Redevelopment. These are the towers that were going to range 80-260 ft.
Is this the same site where State Farm is supposed to come in?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3672  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2013, 10:03 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,451
No. Apache Redevelopment must have gotten the corner wrong...Marina Heights is east of the southeast corner of Rural and Rio.

North side of Rio: [mill ave] [Hayden Ferry Lakeside] [two condo towers] [apartment complex lot] [state farm] [possibly a corner of lot 59] [rural]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3673  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2013, 12:46 AM
Spitfiredude Spitfiredude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
No. Apache Redevelopment must have gotten the corner wrong...Marina Heights is east of the southeast corner of Rural and Rio.

North side of Rio: [mill ave] [Hayden Ferry Lakeside] [two condo towers] [apartment complex lot] [state farm] [possibly a corner of lot 59] [rural]
No, Marina Heights according to COT is located at 300 E Rio Salado Parkway & according to previous documents extends from HFL to Rural Road along the lake (which is where the proposed State Farm complex is suppose to go). However, it would be interesting to see if SunCor Development (who built HFL)/Sunbelt Holdings (unsure if they're related) would be the developer for the State Farm project. So, that could be a possibility. The long awaited development has finally found a tenant. Or, it could be another project that is squished in between State Farm & the new apts. Who knows...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3674  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2013, 1:44 AM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Yes, Marina Heights was the development west of Rural that caused a bit of controversy during the boom IIRC as ASU and Tempe were moving it along rather quicky and suddenly. AFAIK, there hasn't been much activity since.

East of Rural is SouthBank, or the former Pier 202. This development completed utility work I believe and has teased us with a couple of false starts over the last year or so, with the Villas at SouthBank, a 17 story senior living and 2 story commercial phase, and a smaller, low rise apartment building.

Looks like both developments are reportedly seeing action, or is there just some confusion?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3675  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2013, 3:15 AM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,206
What's the deal with the proposal for that piece of land across from the Rural station on the SEC of Rural and 8th St? That's seriously prime real estate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3676  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2013, 4:22 AM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Rural and 8th will consist of 2 20-story residential towers above retail. Phase one is only one tower.
http://www.tempe.gov/PublicBodies/Docs/D...rtingDocuments/DRCr_8th&Rural_021412.pdf

Construction has continued to be delayed- any word on whether this is still alive? A quick Google showed that some type of trasnfer of ownership (with regard to the canal that cuts through I believe) just happened in March, but I can't quite tell what that means.
http://documents.tempe.gov/sirepub/cache/0/gpr5aombywjvgur0jllqgs55/1665517204172013092421703.PDF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3677  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2013, 1:56 PM
ApacheRedevelopment ApacheRedevelopment is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jjs5056 View Post
Rural and 8th will consist of 2 20-story residential towers above retail. Phase one is only one tower.
http://www.tempe.gov/PublicBodies/Docs/D...rtingDocuments/DRCr_8th&Rural_021412.pdf

Construction has continued to be delayed- any word on whether this is still alive? A quick Google showed that some type of trasnfer of ownership (with regard to the canal that cuts through I believe) just happened in March, but I can't quite tell what that means.
http://documents.tempe.gov/sirepub/cache/0/gpr5aombywjvgur0jllqgs55/1665517204172013092421703.PDF
Last I checked they pushed it back because of engineering issues trying to put a tower that close to the canal. Last I saw they werent starting until September 2013, but last I checked was 6 months ago, so it could have been pushed back even further.

Apache Redevelopment
http://www.facebook.com/apacheredevelopment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3678  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2013, 4:29 PM
TempeSilverFox's Avatar
TempeSilverFox TempeSilverFox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tempe AZ
Posts: 153
Does anyone have any information about the Argo at Town Lake? I live very near the project site and have seen absolutely no signs of progress ever since they demolished the existing buildings there. There appears to be a trailer of sorts on the west side of the lot, but other than that, it's been months of nothing...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3679  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2013, 11:02 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,478
Does anyone know what's going on with the apartment development at Curry and Scottsdale Rd. The first phase of the shopping center was demolished but it looks like nothing has happened since then. It's been a few months now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3680  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2013, 6:56 PM
Arquitect's Avatar
Arquitect Arquitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
Does anyone know what's going on with the apartment development at Curry and Scottsdale Rd. The first phase of the shopping center was demolished but it looks like nothing has happened since then. It's been a few months now.
It had been placed on hold, but construction seems to be gearing back up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.